[003]
BattleMaster
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think that the Sorcerer/Warlock and Sorcerer/Paladin multiclass combos for 5th Edition should be removed from this page. Both appear to be based on ignoring parts of the game\'s rules- in the Sorcerer/Warlock\'s case it\'s the rules for fatigue (avoiding taking long rests to rack up infinite sorcery points will cause the character to start taking serious penalties before ultimately dying of fatigue after several days) and/or relying on variant rules to allow Short Rests to be 15 minutes instead of an hour and in the Sorcerer/Paladin\'s case it\'s that the Paladin\'s Divine Smite ability requires the use of a Paladin spell slot and can\'t make use of spell slots from other classes. Without those points, the builds become interesting but not brokenly powerful.
to:
I think that the Sorcerer/Warlock and Sorcerer/Paladin multiclass combos for 5th Edition D&D should be removed from this page. Both appear to be based on ignoring parts of the game\\\'s rules- in the Sorcerer/Warlock\\\'s case it\\\'s the rules for fatigue (avoiding taking long rests to rack up infinite sorcery points will cause the character to start taking serious penalties before ultimately dying of fatigue after several days) and/or relying on variant rules to allow Short Rests to be 15 minutes instead of an hour and in the Sorcerer/Paladin\\\'s case it\\\'s that the Paladin\\\'s Divine Smite ability requires the use of a Paladin spell slot and can\\\'t make use of spell slots from other classes. Without those points, the builds become interesting but not brokenly powerful.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Yes, but the other entries haven\'t been stirring up a controversy the same way Unfortunate Implications has. We\'ve already had two people who were suspended for edit-warring based on that one entry alone. In light of this, I see no reason why we can\'t just leave it off the page and wait one more month until the film is actually out. Until then, I just don\'t think anything good will come from leaving it on the page.
to:
Yes, but the other entries haven\\\'t been stirring up a controversy the same way Unfortunate Implications has. We\\\'ve already had two people who were suspended for edit-warring based on that one entry alone. In light of this, I see no reason why we can\\\'t just leave it off the page and wait one more month until the film is actually out. Until then, I just don\\\'t think anything good will come from keeping it on the page.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Yes, but the other entries haven\'t been stirring up a controversy the same way Unfortunate Implications has. We\'ve already had two people who were suspended for edit-warring based on that one entry alone. In light of this, I see no reason why we can\'t just leave it off the page and wait one more month until the film is actually out.
to:
Yes, but the other entries haven\\\'t been stirring up a controversy the same way Unfortunate Implications has. We\\\'ve already had two people who were suspended for edit-warring based on that one entry alone. In light of this, I see no reason why we can\\\'t just leave it off the page and wait one more month until the film is actually out. Until then, I just don\\\'t think anything good will come from leaving it on the page.
