Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Franchise / ResidentEvil

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ve realised that my latest edit on the page had an edit reason that was way too long and should probably have been here. I hope I didn\'t come across as rude. I don\'t want any kind of war (edit or flame) about Wesker\'s (lack of) Woobie status, and I\'m happy for the trope to be put back if anyone can find better evidence of it. It does make me wonder why WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds is not YMMV when the other Woobie tropes are since a lot of it depends on whether you personally feel pity for the character. In Wesker\'s case, I don\'t, and calling him a Woobie doesn\'t seem right as a result.\\n
to:
I\\\'ve realised that my latest edit on the page had an edit reason that was way too long and should probably have been here. I hope I didn\\\'t come across as rude. I don\\\'t want any kind of war (edit or flame) about Wesker\\\'s (lack of) Woobie status, and I\\\'m happy for the trope to be put back if anyone can find better evidence of it. It does make me wonder why WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds is not YMMV when the other Woobie tropes are since a lot of it depends on whether you personally feel pity for the character. In Wesker\\\'s case, I don\\\'t, and calling him a Woobie doesn\\\'t seem right as a result.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
to:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ve realised that my latest edit on the page had an edit reason that was way too long and should probably have been here. I hope I didn\'t come across as rude. I don\'t want any kind of war (edit or flame) about Wesker\'s (lack of) Woobie status, and I\'m happy for the trope to be put back if anyone can find better evidence of it. It does make me wonder why WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds is not YMMV when the other Woobie tropes are since a lot of it depends on whether you personally feel pity for the character. In Wesker\'s case, I don\'t, and calling him a Woobie doesn\'t seem right as a result.<br>
to:
I\\\'ve realised that my latest edit on the page had an edit reason that was way too long and should probably have been here. I hope I didn\\\'t come across as rude. I don\\\'t want any kind of war (edit or flame) about Wesker\\\'s (lack of) Woobie status, and I\\\'m happy for the trope to be put back if anyone can find better evidence of it. It does make me wonder why WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds is not YMMV when the other Woobie tropes are since a lot of it depends on whether you personally feel pity for the character. In Wesker\\\'s case, I don\\\'t, and calling him a Woobie doesn\\\'t seem right as a result.\\\\n
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ve realised that my latest edit on the page had an edit reason that was way too long and should probably have been here. I hope I didn\'t come across as rude. I don\'t want any kind of war (edit or flame) about Wesker\'s (lack of) Woobie status, and I\'m happy for the trope to be put back if anyone can find better evidence of it. It does make me wonder why WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds is not YMMV when the other Woobie tropes are since a lot of it depends on whether you personally feel pity for the character. In Wesker\'s case, I don\'t, and calling him a Woobie doesn\'t seem right as a result.
to:
I\\\'ve realised that my latest edit on the page had an edit reason that was way too long and should probably have been here. I hope I didn\\\'t come across as rude. I don\\\'t want any kind of war (edit or flame) about Wesker\\\'s (lack of) Woobie status, and I\\\'m happy for the trope to be put back if anyone can find better evidence of it. It does make me wonder why WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds is not YMMV when the other Woobie tropes are since a lot of it depends on whether you personally feel pity for the character. In Wesker\\\'s case, I don\\\'t, and calling him a Woobie doesn\\\'t seem right as a result.<br>
Top