[005]
NubianSatyress
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But a FOS is (to summarize) a flaw commonly attributed to a series that existed in such a moderate or controlled state that it was not seen as one at first. The argument here is the FF’s recent art style is heavily criticized, because in older works, the art was either downplayed in the actual game or intentionally simplified.
to:
But a FOS is (to summarize) a flaw commonly attributed to a series that existed in such a moderate or controlled state that it was not seen as one at first. The argument here is the FF’s recent art style is heavily criticized for being “too pretty and/or overly complex”, because in older works, the art was either downplayed in the actual game or intentionally simplified.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But a FOS is (to summarize) a flaw commonly attributed to a series that existed in such a moderate or controlled state that it was not seen as one at first. The argument here is the FF’s recent art style is heavily criticized, because in older works, the art was either downplayed in the game or intentionally simplified.
to:
But a FOS is (to summarize) a flaw commonly attributed to a series that existed in such a moderate or controlled state that it was not seen as one at first. The argument here is the FF’s recent art style is heavily criticized, because in older works, the art was either downplayed in the actual game or intentionally simplified.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But a FOS is (to summarize) a flaw common attributed to a series that existed in such a moderate or controlled state that it was not seen as one at first.
to:
But a FOS is (to summarize) a flaw commonly attributed to a series that existed in such a moderate or controlled state that it was not seen as one at first. The argument here is the FF’s recent art style is heavily criticized, because in older works, the art was either downplayed in the game or intentionally simplified.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Reading through the example, is that not explained well? I don’t agree with most of the opinions stated, but that isn’t relevant to whether or not the reputation exists. Yes, lots of people love it, but lots of people love Star Wars too, Jar Jar and all. These franchises affect millions. Of course there are dissenting opinions?
to:
Reading through the example, is that not explained well? I don’t agree with most of the opinions stated, but that isn’t relevant to whether or not the reputation exists. I agree: whether more people like it or hate it is both impossible to prove and irrelevant. But, this also isn’t some fringe opinion we’re talking about.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Reading through the example, is that not explained well? I don’t agree with most of the opinions stated, but that isn’t relevant to whether or not the reputation exists.
to:
Reading through the example, is that not explained well? I don’t agree with most of the opinions stated, but that isn’t relevant to whether or not the reputation exists. Yes, lots of people love it, but lots of people love Star Wars too, Jar Jar and all. These franchises affect millions. Of course there are dissenting opinions?
