[002]
Scsigs
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My opinion is that the entries aren't feasible. Both examples not only fail RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment but fall into the problem of WeaselWords. We have a conversation below on Kilmonger; none of us have actually seen any cases of Kilmonger being any more sympathetic than other movie villains. Kilmonger is a well-written character, and many of his arguments fall into VillainHasAPoint, but there doesn't seem to be anything more than that.
to:
My opinion is that the entries aren\'t feasible. Both examples not only fail RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment but fall into the problem of WeaselWords. (Who, specifically, are saying these things other than \"a number of\" or \"many\" people?) We have a conversation below on Kilmonger; none of us have actually seen any cases of Kilmonger being any more sympathetic than other movie villains. Kilmonger is a well-written character, and many of his arguments fall into VillainHasAPoint, but there doesn\'t seem to be anything more than that.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And really, I'd have to see this whole
to:
And really, I\'d have to see this whole \"right wingers embrace T\'Challa\" thing to believe it.
