[005]
FirstStrike
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the ''VI'' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The ''Soulcalibur'' wiki for instance has two profile sections for
to:
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series, I feel like it\'s appropriate to make this as a new starting point just as many other works with reboots and different timelines do. Feel free to discuss here if you have any suggestions or feedback.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the ''VI'' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The ''Soulcalibur'' wiki for instance has two profile sections for
to:
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the \'\'VI\'\' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The \'\'Soulcalibur\'\' wiki for instance has two profile sections for \"Original Timeline\" and \"New Timeline\".
This way, we can keep things clear and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered. The game is basically second point for the series, a new beginning, and I feel like the page should reflect that. We\'re in a brand new continuity, so I feel it should be treated as such.
The way I can see it, the page can go like this:
* Heishiro Mitsurugi
* Sophitia Alexandra
* Grøh
* Nightmare
* Chai Xianghua
* Kilik
* Isabella \"Ivy\" Valentine
* Zasalamel
* Geralt of Rivia
* Siegfried Schtauffen
* Taki
* Yoshimitsu
* Maxi
etc.
And the main page can be organized this way.
Original Timeline:
* Characters/SoulEdge
* Characters/{{Soulcalibur}}
* Characters/SoulcaliburII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIV
* Characters/SoulcaliburV
* Characters/SoulcaliburLegends
* Characters/SoulCaliburNonPlayableCharactersOT
New Timeline:
* Characters/SoulcaliburVI
* Characters/SoulcaliburNonPlayableCharactersNT
And continue from there as the series progresses. Of course, we only add tropes relevant to the NT in the bios, and make sure to wick to the old bios and vice versa to keep things straight.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I felt I should see what others think. I\'ve made the point that since this is a brand new continuity where things will be changed from the old timeline, the pages should match that. But I\'ll see if you guys agree before doing this.
This way, we can keep things clear and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered. The game is basically second point for the series, a new beginning, and I feel like the page should reflect that. We\'re in a brand new continuity, so I feel it should be treated as such.
The way I can see it, the page can go like this:
* Heishiro Mitsurugi
* Sophitia Alexandra
* Grøh
* Nightmare
* Chai Xianghua
* Kilik
* Isabella \"Ivy\" Valentine
* Zasalamel
* Geralt of Rivia
* Siegfried Schtauffen
* Taki
* Yoshimitsu
* Maxi
etc.
And the main page can be organized this way.
Original Timeline:
* Characters/SoulEdge
* Characters/{{Soulcalibur}}
* Characters/SoulcaliburII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIV
* Characters/SoulcaliburV
* Characters/SoulcaliburLegends
* Characters/SoulCaliburNonPlayableCharactersOT
New Timeline:
* Characters/SoulcaliburVI
* Characters/SoulcaliburNonPlayableCharactersNT
And continue from there as the series progresses. Of course, we only add tropes relevant to the NT in the bios, and make sure to wick to the old bios and vice versa to keep things straight.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I felt I should see what others think. I\'ve made the point that since this is a brand new continuity where things will be changed from the old timeline, the pages should match that. But I\'ll see if you guys agree before doing this.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the ''VI'' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The ''Soulcalibur'' wiki for instance has two profile sections for
to:
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the \'\'VI\'\' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The \'\'Soulcalibur\'\' wiki for instance has two profile sections for \"Original Timeline\" and \"New Timeline\".
This way, we can keep things clear and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered. The game is basically second point for the series, a new beginning, and I feel like the page should reflect that. We\'re in a brand new continuity, so I feel it should be treated as such.
The way I can see it, the page can go like this:
* Heishiro Mitsurugi
* Sophitia Alexandra
* Grøh
* Nightmare
* Chai Xianghua
* Kilik
* Isabella \"Ivy\" Valentine
* Zasalamel
* Geralt of Rivia
* Siegfried Schtauffen
* Taki
* Yoshimitsu
* Maxi
etc.
And the main page can be organized this way.
Original Timeline:
* Characters/SoulEdge
* Characters/{{Soulcalibur}}
* Characters/SoulcaliburII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIV
* Characters/SoulcaliburV
* Characters/SoulcaliburLegends
* Characters/SoulCaliburNonPlayableCharactersOT
New Timeline:
* Characters/SoulcaliburVI
* Characters/SoulcaliburNonPlayableCharactersNT
And continue from there as the series progresses.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I felt I should see what others think. I\'ve made the point that since this is a brand new continuity where things will be changed from the old timeline, the page should match that. But I\'ll see if you guys agree before doing this.
This way, we can keep things clear and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered. The game is basically second point for the series, a new beginning, and I feel like the page should reflect that. We\'re in a brand new continuity, so I feel it should be treated as such.
The way I can see it, the page can go like this:
* Heishiro Mitsurugi
* Sophitia Alexandra
* Grøh
* Nightmare
* Chai Xianghua
* Kilik
* Isabella \"Ivy\" Valentine
* Zasalamel
* Geralt of Rivia
* Siegfried Schtauffen
* Taki
* Yoshimitsu
* Maxi
etc.
And the main page can be organized this way.
Original Timeline:
* Characters/SoulEdge
* Characters/{{Soulcalibur}}
* Characters/SoulcaliburII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIV
* Characters/SoulcaliburV
* Characters/SoulcaliburLegends
* Characters/SoulCaliburNonPlayableCharactersOT
New Timeline:
* Characters/SoulcaliburVI
* Characters/SoulcaliburNonPlayableCharactersNT
And continue from there as the series progresses.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I felt I should see what others think. I\'ve made the point that since this is a brand new continuity where things will be changed from the old timeline, the page should match that. But I\'ll see if you guys agree before doing this.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the ''VI'' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The ''Soulcalibur'' wiki for instance has two profile sections for
to:
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the \'\'VI\'\' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The \'\'Soulcalibur\'\' wiki for instance has two profile sections for \"Original Timeline\" and \"New Timeline\".
This way, we can keep things clear and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered. The game is basically second point for the series, a new beginning, and I feel like the page should reflect that. We\'re in a brand new continuity, so I feel it should be treated as such.
The way I can see it, the page can go like this:
* Heishiro Mitsurugi
* Sophitia Alexandra
* Grøh
* Nightmare
* Chai Xianghua
* Kilik
* Isabella \"Ivy\" Valentine
* Zasalamel
* Geralt of Rivia
* Siegfried Schtauffen
* Yoshimitsu
* Maxi
etc.
And the main page can be organized this way.
Original Timeline:
* Characters/SoulEdge
* Characters/{{Soulcalibur}}
* Characters/SoulcaliburII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIV
* Characters/SoulcaliburV
* Characters/SoulcaliburLegends
* Characters/SoulCaliburNonPlayableCharactersOT
New Timeline:
* Characters/SoulcaliburVI
* Characters/SoulcaliburNonPlayableCharactersNT
And continue from there as the series progresses.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I felt I should see what others think. I\'ve made the point that since this is a brand new continuity where things will be changed from the old timeline, the page should match that. But I\'ll see if you guys agree before doing this.
This way, we can keep things clear and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered. The game is basically second point for the series, a new beginning, and I feel like the page should reflect that. We\'re in a brand new continuity, so I feel it should be treated as such.
The way I can see it, the page can go like this:
* Heishiro Mitsurugi
* Sophitia Alexandra
* Grøh
* Nightmare
* Chai Xianghua
* Kilik
* Isabella \"Ivy\" Valentine
* Zasalamel
* Geralt of Rivia
* Siegfried Schtauffen
* Yoshimitsu
* Maxi
etc.
And the main page can be organized this way.
Original Timeline:
* Characters/SoulEdge
* Characters/{{Soulcalibur}}
* Characters/SoulcaliburII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIII
* Characters/SoulcaliburIV
* Characters/SoulcaliburV
* Characters/SoulcaliburLegends
* Characters/SoulCaliburNonPlayableCharactersOT
New Timeline:
* Characters/SoulcaliburVI
* Characters/SoulcaliburNonPlayableCharactersNT
And continue from there as the series progresses.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I felt I should see what others think. I\'ve made the point that since this is a brand new continuity where things will be changed from the old timeline, the page should match that. But I\'ll see if you guys agree before doing this.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the ''VI'' page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The ''Soulcalibur'' wiki for instance has two profile sections for
to:
Since this is a ContinuityReboot of the series with a new timeline, should we make the \'\'VI\'\' character page a new starting point just like that game itself? As in, characters from past games debuting in the rebooted timeline are featured here, like how other works with reboots and different continuities have multiple pages for them. The \'\'Soulcalibur\'\' wiki for instance has two profile sections for \"Original Timeline\" and \"New Timeline\".
This way, we can keep things clear, organize characters based on affiliation, and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I thought I\'d see what other people think of this idea.
This way, we can keep things clear, organize characters based on affiliation, and generally make sure things don\'t get too cluttered.
However, this is a pretty big proposal so I thought I\'d see what other people think of this idea.
