Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / MCUIronMan

Go To

[029] Hjortron18 Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
So, troper Asherinka trimmed the entry for
to:
So, troper Asherinka trimmed the entry for \"AmbiguousDisorder\" down, troper maxsuldor added some parts to it.

The whole entry looks like this now:

->After The Avengers, Tony is shown to have a form of anxiety disorder (most likely PTSD). He has panic attacks during Iron Man 3 coupled with nightmares. In Avengers: Age of Ultron, while the panic part seems to be under control, he does show signs of obsessive worrying. In Captain America: Civil War, he shows excess guilt over what happened. All of this seems to carry over into Avengers: Infinity War, with it being heavily implied that Tony\'s mental state just took a turn for the worse — if the last scene of him sitting with his knees drawn up to his chest and practically catatonic is anything to go by.
-->Anxiety and anxiety-linked issues aside, Tony has displayed a penchant for odd behaviors in general. He\'s been seen doing and saying seemingly random and eccentric things, including threatening his mechanical lab assistants and AI systems, purposefully poking Bruce Banner in order to evoke the Hulk (and expressing excitement over the idea of the Hulk running rampant), dropping dissonant remarks both inside and outside of combat (such as when he was rediscovering a new element in Iron Man 2; he destroys a good portion of his lab in the process, and gives a gleeful \"Oops!\" as the laser is cutting things in half. He also casually notes \"That was easy,\" after the element is created), giving nicknames to everyone and everything, and has very little social ability beyond formal talks or Snark-to-Snark Combat. Natasha Romanoff sums it up adequately in her report of him: \"Mr Stark displays compulsive behaviour, is prone to self-destructive tendencies, and demonstrates textbook narcissism.\"

I think that the entry doesn\'t have to be that long, and especially the part about \'\'IW\'\' doesn\'t seem to be about an \'\'disorder\'\', but more about a acute reaction to emotional trauma. Also the second part where Tony\'s eccentric behavior gets mentioned could be trimmed down a bit again.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You're acting like vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are terrible and scandalous and a sign of a secret agenda, but you wouldn't complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian trappings, would you?
to:
But, believe it or not, I despise arguing about religion and politics, and I just want this whole saga to be done.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
But, believe it or not, I despise arguing about religion and politics, and I just want all of this to be done.

to:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You're acting like vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are terrible and scandalous and a sign of a secret agenda, but you wouldn't complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian trappings, would you?
to:
You\'re acting like vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are terrible and scandalous and a sign of a secret agenda, but you wouldn\'t complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian trappings, would you?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Can't the page just be left as it is? I'm tired of this debate, and I'm getting the impression that everyone else is too.
to:
But, believe it or not, I despise arguing about religion and politics, and I just want all of this to be done.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You're acting like vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are terrible and scandalous and a sign of a secret agenda, but you wouldn't complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian trappings, would you?
to:
You\'re acting like vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are terrible and scandalous and a sign of a secret agenda, but you wouldn\'t complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian trappings, would you?
Changed line(s) 4 from:
to:
Can\'t the page just be left as it is? I\'m tired of this debate, and I\'m getting the impression that everyone else is too.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It just...seems like bashing the game to this extent for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, your trope entries) seem rather biased toward the *right* wing. (I mean, if vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are SO terrible and scandalous and SURELY a sign of a secret agenda). I mean, you accuse me of bias, but you openly admit to your own.
to:
It just...seems like bashing the game to this extent for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, your trope entries) seem rather biased toward the *right* wing.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian leanings, would you?
to:
You\'re acting like vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are terrible and scandalous and a sign of a secret agenda, but you wouldn\'t complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian trappings, would you?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if you suspected right-wing or Christian leanings on the part of the devs, would you?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the Angara had right-wing or Christian leanings, would you?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian bias on the part of the devs, would you?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if you suspected right-wing or Christian leanings on the part of the devs, would you?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It just...seems like blasting the game to this extent for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, the page) seem rather biased toward the *right* wing. (I mean, if vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are SO terrible and scandalous and SURELY a sign of a secret agenda).
to:
It just...seems like bashing the game to this extent for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, your trope entries) seem rather biased toward the *right* wing. (I mean, if vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are SO terrible and scandalous and SURELY a sign of a secret agenda). I mean, you accuse me of bias, but you openly admit to your own.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian bias on the part of the devs, would you?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian bias on the part of the devs, would you?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It just...seems like blasting the game for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, the page) seem rather biased toward the *right* wing. (I mean, if vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are SO terrible and scandalous and SURELY a sign of a secret agenda).
to:
It just...seems like blasting the game to this extent for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, the page) seem rather biased toward the *right* wing. (I mean, if vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are SO terrible and scandalous and SURELY a sign of a secret agenda).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian bias on the part of the devs, would you?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian bias on the part of the devs, would you?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian agenda on the part of the devs, would you?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian bias on the part of the devs, would you?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It just...seems like blasting the game for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, the page) seem biased toward the *right* wing.
to:
It just...seems like blasting the game for supposedly being biased toward the left wing makes you (and by extension, the page) seem rather biased toward the *right* wing. (I mean, if vaguely New-Agey values and non-traditional families are SO terrible and scandalous and SURELY a sign of a secret agenda).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian agenda on the part of the devs, would you?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian agenda on the part of the devs, would you?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? No matter how blatant it was?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if you suspected a right-wing or Christian agenda on the part of the devs, would you?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? No matter how blatant it was?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you even mention it, let alone in negative terms?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you even mention it, let alone in negative terms?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Would you have called that Anvillicious?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
to:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Even if you would have admitted to that bias if pushed, would you have even bothered editing the page?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Would you have called that Anvillicious?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Would you have even bothered editing the page if that were the case?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Even if you would have admitted to that bias if pushed, would you have even bothered editing the page?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Would you have even bothered editing the page if that were the case?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Would you have even bothered editing the page if that were the case?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object? Would you have even bothered editing the page if that were the case?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That seems like the kind of bias you want.
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That would be biased, but would you object?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That seems like the kind of bias you want.
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That seems like the kind of bias you want.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You wouldn't complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That seems like the kind of
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That seems like the kind of bias you want.



Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
to:
You wouldn\'t complain if the angara reflected traditional, Christian values and had perfect nuclear families, would you? That seems like the kind of \"bias\" you want.



Top