[013]
BURGINABC
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
\'\'\'EDIT:\'\'\' I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move.
Such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance, due to how their relationship was developed throughout Judy\'s recovery and how their RelationshipUpgrade tied into the completion of her recovery and the ultimate resolution of the plot.
Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 and many others seem to disagree about that)[[/note]]
Any thoughts?
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
\'\'\'EDIT:\'\'\' I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move.
Such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance, due to how their relationship was developed throughout Judy\'s recovery and how their RelationshipUpgrade tied into the completion of her recovery and the ultimate resolution of the plot.
Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 and many others seem to disagree about that)[[/note]]
Any thoughts?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move.
Such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance, due to how their relationship was developed throughout Judy\'s recovery and how their RelationshipUpgrade tied into the completion of her recovery and the ultimate resolution of the plot.
Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 and many others seem to disagree about that)[[/note]]
Any thoughts?
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move.
Such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance, due to how their relationship was developed throughout Judy\'s recovery and how their RelationshipUpgrade tied into the completion of her recovery and the ultimate resolution of the plot.
Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 and many others seem to disagree about that)[[/note]]
Any thoughts?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move.
Such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance, due to how their relationship was developed throughout Judy\'s recovery and how their RelationshipUpgrade tied into the completion of her recovery and the ultimate resolution of the plot.
Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 and many others seem to disagree about that)[[/note]]
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move.
Such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance, due to how their relationship was developed throughout Judy\'s recovery and how their RelationshipUpgrade tied into the completion of her recovery and the ultimate resolution of the plot.
Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 and many others seem to disagree about that)[[/note]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 seems to disagree about that)[[/note]]
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue\" in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \'\'Water Under the Bridge\'\' was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 seems to disagree about that)[[/note]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \"Water Under the Bridge\" was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 seems to disagree about that)[[/note]]
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \"Water Under the Bridge\" was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.[[note]](To its detriment in my opinion, though rva98014 seems to disagree about that)[[/note]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \"Water Under the Bridge\" was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.)
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \"Water Under the Bridge\" was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.)
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily argue be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \"Water Under the Bridge\" was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.)
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts? Granted, by that standard probably a few other fics currently listed as Gen might also warrant a move (such as \'\'A Bitter Pill\'\', which initially seemed like a gen fic early on but in hindsight could easily argue be argued to be a slow-burn romance. Also \"Water Under the Bridge\" was largely an action thriller but also gave quite substantial emphasis to its romantic subplot.)
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts?
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back down, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts?
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list. It may warrant being moved back, possibly tagged as \"slow burn\" or something.
Any thoughts?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list.
Any thoughts?
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent (i.e, not just incidental) part of it. It may actually belong in that list.
Any thoughts?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent part of it.
Any thoughts?
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
----
EDIT: I just took a cursory look at the opening chapters of season 2, and I\'m wondering if Kalmbach wasn\'t right about putting it in the Shipping section.
Especially now that this listing is specific to the stories that have \"Guardian Blue in the title, rather than to the whole continuity, thus negating the concern about lumping the more ambiguous portrayal of their relationship in [=TftF=] into the shipping section.
[=GB=] may not focus 100% on shipping, but it looks to be a very prominent part of it.
Any thoughts?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It is listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying
to:
It is now listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have gone ahead and taken the liberty of merging the entries for [=GBS1=] and [=GB=], as an ongoing gen fic, with the entry simply saying
to:
I have gone ahead and taken the liberty of merging the entries for [=GBS1=] and [=GB=].
It is listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
It is listed as an ongoing gen fic recommended by both rva98014 and Kalmbach, with the entry simply saying \"Guardian Blue\", but with the link pointing directly to Season 1 rather than to the series page which includes the earlier fics.
I chose a concise synopsis adapted from the Season 1 synopis on [=AO3=], and acknowledged its connection to [=TftF=] via an aside note. I also migrated the pairing tags from Kalmbach\'s entry, but not the other tags as they seemed spurious.
The review page won\'t be a problem as the Season 1 review page only had an \"intentionally left blank\" review on it where I had retracted my own review.
Does this seem like a good solution?
