[001]
StFan
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The first example is a bit too ranting against Tony Stark, and may attract natterish responses; it should be avoided on the ground that ExamplesAreNotArguable. And it is no longer true Tony don't car about consequences, as this movie and ''Civil War'' demonstrated.
to:
The first example is a bit too ranting against Tony Stark, and may attract natterish responses; it should be avoided on the ground that ExamplesAreNotArguable. And it is no longer true Tony doesn\'t care about consequences, as this movie and \'\'Civil War\'\' demonstrated.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The second example is way too much speculative. We don't know that there is no legal market or that Damage Control does nothing with the salvage; the piling up in a government warehouse could be a temporary measure, the time to check if the salvage isn't contaminated in some way (an episode of ''Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D'' deals with an alien Chitauri virus transmitted by one piece of such salvage). And the whole comparison to the Aztecs is completely beyond the subject, it has no place on the non-YMMV part of an article.
to:
The second example is way too much speculative. We don\'t know that there is no legal market or that Damage Control does nothing with the salvage; the piling up in a government warehouse could be a temporary measure, the time to check if the salvage isn\'t contaminated in some way (an episode of \'\'Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D\'\' deals with an alien Chitauri virus transmitted by one piece of such salvage). And the whole comparison to the Aztecs is completely beyond the subject, it has no place on the non-YMMV part of an article.
