Remark History - TV Tropes

Discussion History Main / BraggartBoss

Go To

[003] BMeph Current Version

Changed line(s) 1 from:

Snoke?

to:

Snoke - does he qualify? We hear about how powerful and evil he is...we do see him act with power and being unpleasant, but he fell for one of the classic take-downs, and in a position known for [[KlingonPromotion]], it feels like he qualifies.

[002] Harrowing

21st Apr '17 at 04:32:59 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

1. You, yourself, said that Ann's entry is specifically for the manga. Makoto's would be for the game. A second entry makes perfect sense in that context.

to:

1. You, yourself, said that Ann\'s entry is specifically for the manga. Makoto\'s would be for the game. A second entry makes perfect sense in that context.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

2. Once more: it's the glance afterwards that implies something. This is at least the third time I've explained that. It's a subtle gesture but those matter in a visual medium.

to:

2. Once more: it\'s the glance afterwards that implies something. This is at least the third time I\'ve explained that. It\'s a subtle gesture but those matter in a visual medium.

Changed line(s) 5 from:

3. You're deliberately ignoring the use of tropes in writing--a shorthand to communicate a storytelling idea to an audience that a writer uses befause they know an audience will read a scene a certain way--to argue against me. You're willfully ignoring evidence that doesn't support your argument because you don't like my conclusion. I mean, if I search your username on here I can find you doing the same thing with Mipha vs Zelda as the implied love interest in Breath of the Wild. You're either the one looking at everything through your preferred ship or you've drawn a conclusion and have declared the matter settled.

to:

3. You\'re deliberately ignoring the use of tropes in writing--a shorthand to communicate a storytelling idea to an audience that a writer uses befause they know an audience will read a scene a certain way--to argue against me. The reason I\'m arguing using tropes is because they have established implications when they\'re used, and writers use them on purpose to convey those implications to the audience. You\'re willfully ignoring evidence that doesn\'t support your argument because you don\'t like my conclusion. I mean, if I search your username on here I can find you doing the same thing with Mipha vs Zelda as the implied love interest in Breath of the Wild. You\'re either the one looking at everything through your preferred ship or you\'ve drawn a conclusion and have declared the matter settled.

Discussion History Main / BraggartBoss