[003]
Loremasta1
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
If I recall correctly, there were some women in the second Indiana Jones film who weren't portrayed as stupid, wrong or evil; admittedly they were background characters such as dancers and the villagers wanting their missing children back and I could be wrong; that does bring to mind the problem that those two Indiana Jones movies had a shortage of female characters in general, but that is another issue. I don't recall a single man who wasn't one of the three aforementioned traits in Ghostbusters 2016, even among the background characters.
to:
If I recall correctly, there were some women in the second Indiana Jones film who weren\'t portrayed as stupid, wrong or evil; admittedly they were background characters such as dancers and the villagers wanting their missing children back and I could be wrong; that does bring to mind the problem that those two Indiana Jones movies had a shortage of female characters in general, but that is another issue. I don\'t recall a single man who wasn\'t one of the three aforementioned traits in Ghostbusters 2016, even among the background characters.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Nonetheless you raise an interesting point. There have been similar problems among older films. Perhaps we see it differently, NubianSatyress, and that's what the YMMV page is for. I also appreciate how you two (Lark and Nubian) are so civil on a subject that can be charged like gender politics. Thank you. I would still like to add it and would like to hear the ideas of others on what to add.
to:
Nonetheless you raise an interesting point. There have been similar problems among older films. Perhaps we see it differently, NubianSatyress, and that\'s what the YMMV page is for. I also appreciate how you two (Lark and Nubian) are so civil on a subject that can be charged like gender politics. Thank you. I would still like to add it and would like to hear the ideas of others on what to add.
