Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / FanPreferredCouple

Go To

[004] TripleElation Current Version

19th Jul '10 at 01:34:40 AM

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

I\'m not trying to edit war here and obviously you can revert if that strikes your fancy, but... deleting and overriding the \'\'whole thing\'\' without salvaging a single sentence is really overkill. The ExampleAsThesis had taken completely over the earlier version and that was a problem, so the solution to that was to trim it to sane proportions, not to nuke it. Same with the quote at the top, which has to do with a serious contender for the MostTriumphantExample of this trope.

to:

I\\\'m not trying to edit war here and obviously you can revert if that strikes your fancy, but... deleting and overriding the \\\'\\\'whole thing\\\'\\\' without salvaging a single sentence is really overkill. The ExampleAsThesis had taken completely over the earlier version and that was a problem, so the solution to that was to trim it to sane proportions, not to nuke it. Same with the quote at the top, which has to do with a serious contender for the MostTriumphantExample of this trope. I just don\\\'t see why it needed to go.

Changed line(s) 5 from:

n

It seems to me your \

to:

[[SincerityMode It seems to me your \\\"straight description\\\" additions were really great and helped the article a lot.]]

[003] TripleElation

19th Jul '10 at 01:33:13 AM

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

I\'m not trying to edit war here and obviously you can revert if that strikes your fancy, but... deleting and overriding the \'\'whole thing\'\' without salvaging a single sentence is really overkill. The ExampleAsThesis had taken completely over the earlier version and that was a problem, so the solution to that was to retrim it to sane proportions, not to nuke it. Same with the quote at the top, which has to do with a serious contender for the MostTriumphantExample of this trope.

to:

I\\\'m not trying to edit war here and obviously you can revert if that strikes your fancy, but... deleting and overriding the \\\'\\\'whole thing\\\'\\\' without salvaging a single sentence is really overkill. The ExampleAsThesis had taken completely over the earlier version and that was a problem, so the solution to that was to trim it to sane proportions, not to nuke it. Same with the quote at the top, which has to do with a serious contender for the MostTriumphantExample of this trope.

Changed line(s) 5 from:

n

It seems to me your \

to:

It seems to me your \\\"straight description\\\" additions were really great and helped the article a lot.

[002] TripleElation

19th Jul '10 at 01:32:34 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I tried to reinstate the good parts, sans cruft, plus references to your misgivings. Plus a tiny push back in the direction of not completely subjective tropes. There\'s actual trope material here and it\'d be a shame if we eventually have to move it to SugarWiki.

to:

I tried to reinstate the good parts, sans cruft, plus references to your misgivings. Plus a tiny push back in the direction of not completely subjective tropes. There\\\'s actual trope material here and it\\\'d be a shame if we eventually have to move it to SugarWiki.

I\\\'m not trying to edit war here and obviously you can revert if that strikes your fancy, but... deleting and overriding the \\\'\\\'whole thing\\\'\\\' without salvaging a single sentence is really overkill. The ExampleAsThesis had taken completely over the earlier version and that was a problem, so the solution to that was to retrim it to sane proportions, not to nuke it. Same with the quote at the top, which has to do with a serious contender for the MostTriumphantExample of this trope.

It seems to me your \\\"straight description\\\" additions were really great and helped the article a lot.

[001] TripleElation

18th Jul '10 at 11:16:00 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I tried to reinstate the good parts, sans cruft, plus references to your misgivings.

to:

I tried to reinstate the good parts, sans cruft, plus references to your misgivings. Plus a tiny push back in the direction of not completely subjective tropes. There\\\'s actual trope material here and it\\\'d be a shame if we eventually have to move it to SugarWiki.

Top