Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / FireEmblemWarriors

Go To

[004] BZL8 Current Version

5th Nov '17 at 11:06:56 AM

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

* BrokenBase: The game's decision for the roster to focus primarily on ''Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight'', ''Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening'', and ''Videogame/FireEmblemFates'' has divided the fanbase. With ''Warriors'' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that ''Awakening'' and ''Fates'' being the best-selling ''Fire Emblem'' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacter base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

to:

* BrokenBase: The game\'s decision for the roster to focus primarily on \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight\'\', \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening\'\', and \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemFates\'\' has divided the fanbase. With \'\'Warriors\'\' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that \'\'Awakening\'\' and \'\'Fates\'\' being the best-selling \'\'Fire Emblem\'\' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacter base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

Changed line(s) 5 from:

to:

\'\'\'Edit\'\'\': Resolved.

[003] BZL8

5th Nov '17 at 09:37:16 AM

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

* BrokenBase: The game's decision for the roster to focus primarily on ''Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight'', ''Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening'', and ''Videogame/FireEmblemFates'' has divided the fanbase. With ''Warriors'' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that ''Awakening'' and ''Fates'' being the best-selling ''Fire Emblem'' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacter base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

to:

* BrokenBase: The game\'s decision for the roster to focus primarily on \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight\'\', \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening\'\', and \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemFates\'\' has divided the fanbase. With \'\'Warriors\'\' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that \'\'Awakening\'\' and \'\'Fates\'\' being the best-selling \'\'Fire Emblem\'\' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacter base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

Given that the roster is contested, I want to make sure an entry on the roster is added to minimize edits that complain about the roster.

[002] BZL8

5th Nov '17 at 09:35:12 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

Someone went ahead and unlocked the page. To prevent possible issues of bad BrokenBase entries, here is my proposed entry. I personally think it could be improved on, but it is a start:

to:

Someone went ahead and unlocked the page. To prevent possible issues of bad BrokenBase entries, here is my proposed entry (Do not add this just yet). I personally think it could be improved on, but it is a start:

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

* BrokenBase: The game's decision for the roster to focus primarily on ''Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight'', ''Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening'', and ''Videogame/FireEmblemFates'' has divided the fanbase. With ''Warriors'' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that ''Awakening'' and ''Fates'' being the best-selling ''Fire Emblem'' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacter base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

to:

* BrokenBase: The game\'s decision for the roster to focus primarily on \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight\'\', \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening\'\', and \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemFates\'\' has divided the fanbase. With \'\'Warriors\'\' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that \'\'Awakening\'\' and \'\'Fates\'\' being the best-selling \'\'Fire Emblem\'\' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacter base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

[001] BZL8

5th Nov '17 at 09:33:32 AM

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

* BrokenBase: The game's decision for the roster to focus primarily on ''Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight'', ''Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening'', and ''Videogame/FireEmblemFates'' has divided the fanbase. With ''Warriors'' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that ''Awakening'' and ''Fates'' being the best-selling ''Fire Emblem'' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacters base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

to:

* BrokenBase: The game\'s decision for the roster to focus primarily on \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemShadowDragonAndTheBladeOfLight\'\', \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemAwakening\'\', and \'\'Videogame/FireEmblemFates\'\' has divided the fanbase. With \'\'Warriors\'\' being a spin-off of a 27-year old franchise, would the game ultimately be better off as a worthy spin-off had it pulled characters from older games? Or does the fact that \'\'Awakening\'\' and \'\'Fates\'\' being the best-selling \'\'Fire Emblem\'\' titles and their characters being more recognizable justify focusing on three games? Not helping this is that a fair number of characters are [[BaseBreakingCharacter base-breaking]] among parts of the fanbase, as well as a poor excuse from the developers to justify focusing on three games (more information is listed under TaintedByThePreview). All in all, the roster is heavily contested and debated by the fanbase and should be [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement treated with utmost caution]].

Top