Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I'm not convinced that the smartphone versions of VideoGame/FinalFantasyV and [[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVI VI]] belong here. I haven't seen too many complaints about the mobile version of V aside from people disliking the new graphical style (which doesn't affect playability) and the bugs and typos in VI have since been fixed and I was able to beat it with no problems.
to:
I\'m not convinced that the smartphone versions of VideoGame/FinalFantasyV and [[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVI VI]] belong here. I haven\'t seen too many complaints about the mobile version of V aside from people disliking the new graphical style (which doesn\'t affect playability) and the bugs and typos in VI have since been fixed and I was able to beat it with no problems.
Edit: I think VI should still be listed as a former example due to the game-crashing bug it used to have, but it\'s been fixed. However, as I said, the main problem anyone has with V is the graphical style. If anything, it\'s done better than VI\'s mobile version; for example, it completely dropped the grid-based movement of previous versions instead of just adding the ability to move diagonally.
Edit: I think VI should still be listed as a former example due to the game-crashing bug it used to have, but it\'s been fixed. However, as I said, the main problem anyone has with V is the graphical style. If anything, it\'s done better than VI\'s mobile version; for example, it completely dropped the grid-based movement of previous versions instead of just adding the ability to move diagonally.
