Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Put it this way: can you think of a good reason why xkcdexplained \'\'needs\'\' to be on this page? The alternative to self-policing is to have pages scrubbed and locked and tropers banned.
to:
Put it this way: can you think of a good reason why xkcdexplained \\\'\\\'needs\\\'\\\' to be on this page? Having it here only increases the likelihood of attracting {{Natter}}, as can easily be seen from recent edits.
The alternative to self-policing is to have pages scrubbed and locked and tropers banned.
The alternative to self-policing is to have pages scrubbed and locked and tropers banned.
[001]
Fighteer
MOD
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
My point is that a substantial part of the bile that gets heaped on many controversial pages like {{xkcd}} seems to be derived from the idea that a discussion of the subject cannot be completely without mentioning every example of hatedom that exists. That\'s not the point of the wiki. In fact, we\'re on a general mission from the admins to cut out this kind of cruft and reduce the use of SubjectiveTropes and tropes that apply to the fandom rather than the work. We are not Wikipedia, but we also aren\'t ED.
to:
My point is that a substantial part of the bile that gets heaped on many controversial pages like {{xkcd}} seems to be derived from the idea that a discussion of the subject cannot be complete without mentioning every example of hatedom that exists. That\\\'s not the point of the wiki. In fact, we\\\'re on a general mission from the admins to cut out this kind of cruft and reduce the use of SubjectiveTropes and tropes that apply to the fandom rather than the work. We are not Wikipedia, but we also aren\\\'t ED.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Put it this way: can you think of a good reason why {{xkcdexplained}} \'\'needs\'\' to be on this page?
to:
Put it this way: can you think of a good reason why xkcdexplained \\\'\\\'needs\\\'\\\' to be on this page? The alternative to self-policing is to have pages scrubbed and locked and tropers banned.
