Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History FanficRecs / Zootopia

Go To

[005] BURGINABC Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don't think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that's more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
to:
I don\'t think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that\'s more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don't have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the
to:
You \'\'could\'\' post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don\'t have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the \"comments\" heading.

If I were you, though, I would just let it go. There\'s a lot of these I don\'t like, and one of the most common reasons is that their characterization of Judy is irreconcilable with my own interpretation of her personality, but I don\'t bother complaining.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don't think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that's more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
to:
I don\'t think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that\'s more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don't have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the
to:
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don\'t have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the \"comments\" heading.

If I were you, though, I would just let it go. There\'s a lot of these I don\'t like, and one of the most common reasons is that their characterization of Judy is irreconcilable with my own interpretation of her personality, but I don\'t bother complaining.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don't think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that's more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
to:
I don\'t think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that\'s more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don't have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the
to:
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don\'t have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the \"comments\" heading.

If I were you, though, I would just let it go. There\'s a lot of these I don\'t like, and one of the most common reasons is that their characterization of Judy contradicts my interpretation of her, but I don\'t bother complaining.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don't think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that's more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
to:
I don\'t think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that\'s more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don't have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the
to:
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don\'t have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the \"comments\" heading.

If I were you, though, I would just let it go. There\'s a lot of these I don\'t like, and one of the most common reasons is that they contradict my headcanons about Judy, but I don\'t bother complaining.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don't think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations.
to:
I don\'t think questionable characterization is what it meant by non-canon interpretations; I think that\'s more about making sure [[AlternateUniverse AU]]s are labeled as such.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don't have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the
to:
You could post a negative review though. Unfortunately it seems like we don\'t have the proper reviewing mechanisms set up on this page, but it looks like people are posting reviews using signed sub-bullets on the \"comments\" heading.
Top