[002]
LB7979
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
There are several Tropes listed here on this page that ThisTroper thinks don't apply, but I don't want to take the brute option to just remove them; so please discuss.
to:
There are several Tropes listed here on this page that I think don\'t apply, but don\'t want to take the brute option to just remove them; so please discuss.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
- {{Bifauxnen}} - Example is about a girl that wears a tuxedo, but that is the only traditional-gender-definition-defying act happening here; in no way is Ruthie (the character in question) ''androgynous'' (which is pretty much the definition of the Trope); she's just a girl that wears a tuxedo. For
to:
- {{Bifauxnen}} - Example is about a girl that wears a tuxedo, but that is the only traditional-gender-definition-defying act happening here; in no way is Ruthie (the character in question) \'\'androgynous\'\' (which is pretty much the definition of the Trope); she\'s just a girl that wears a tuxedo. For \"Bifauxnen\" to apply, doesn\'t it have to be a girl that is androgynous?
-{{CharacterAsHimself}} - The dog is listed. Uhm, isn\'t pretty much any non-human actor / character, \"playing themselves\" by definition? Also, the entry refers to Happy the dog as \"ever suffering\" - doesn\'t apply, as Happy the dog was lovingly adopted by the Camden family and well-cared for and adored by them throughout the series.
-{{CharacterAsHimself}} - The dog is listed. Uhm, isn\'t pretty much any non-human actor / character, \"playing themselves\" by definition? Also, the entry refers to Happy the dog as \"ever suffering\" - doesn\'t apply, as Happy the dog was lovingly adopted by the Camden family and well-cared for and adored by them throughout the series.
