[002]
TripleElation
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In accordance with my own post two subjects above and with faux officiality intended to impose a false sense of consensus and intimidate anyone who might object, I have started cutting down on the examples/natter extensively to weed away anything that amounts to \
to:
In accordance with my own post two subjects above and with faux officiality intended to impose a false sense of consensus and intimidate anyone who might object, I have started cutting down on the examples/natter extensively to weed away anything that amounts to \\\"there\\\'s also support for pairing X\\\". Gone through Anime/Manga and Comics so far. It really pains me to do this because I find myself cutting stuff about fandoms I have no clue about, so I can\\\'t replace it with brilliant prose (Which is obviously superior to cutting).
It also pains me to do this because chances are these pairings aren\\\'t less popular, it\\\'s just that their fans didn\\\'t have the audacity to claim that they are popular enough to be this trope. In some places where I saw a lot of work went into an entry I went ahead and decided to be audacious for them in hopes WikiMagic would slam the wrong ones.
Well anyway I don\\\'t delude myself that this is going to be in any way popular, but the point is, if your favorite obviously-an-example was mutilated or taken down this wasn\\\'t out of judgment or malice, but because I really have no clue. Just put it back in and make sure to phrase it so it lays a coherent claim to be this trope.
It also pains me to do this because chances are these pairings aren\\\'t less popular, it\\\'s just that their fans didn\\\'t have the audacity to claim that they are popular enough to be this trope. In some places where I saw a lot of work went into an entry I went ahead and decided to be audacious for them in hopes WikiMagic would slam the wrong ones.
Well anyway I don\\\'t delude myself that this is going to be in any way popular, but the point is, if your favorite obviously-an-example was mutilated or taken down this wasn\\\'t out of judgment or malice, but because I really have no clue. Just put it back in and make sure to phrase it so it lays a coherent claim to be this trope.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In accordance with my own post two subjects above and with faux officiality intended to impose a false sense of consensus and intimidate anyone who might object, I have started cutting down on the examples/natter extensively to weed away anything that amounts to \
to:
In accordance with my own post two subjects above and with faux officiality intended to impose a false sense of consensus and intimidate anyone who might object, I have started cutting down on the examples/natter extensively to weed away anything that amounts to \\\"there\\\'s also support for pairing X\\\". It really pains me to do this because I find myself cutting stuff about fandoms I have no clue about, so I can\\\'t replace it with brilliant prose (Which is obviously superior to cutting).
It also pains me to do this because chances are these pairings aren\\\'t less popular, it\\\'s just that their fans didn\\\'t have the audacity to claim that they are popular enough to be this trope. In some places where I saw a lot of work went into an entry I went ahead and decided to be audacious for them in hopes WikiMagic would slam the wrong ones.
Well anyway I don\\\'t delude myself that this is going to be in any way popular, but the point is, if your favorite obviously-an-example was mutilated or taken down this wasn\\\'t out of judgment or malice, but because I really have no clue. Just put it back in and make sure to phrase it so it lays a coherent claim to be this trope.
It also pains me to do this because chances are these pairings aren\\\'t less popular, it\\\'s just that their fans didn\\\'t have the audacity to claim that they are popular enough to be this trope. In some places where I saw a lot of work went into an entry I went ahead and decided to be audacious for them in hopes WikiMagic would slam the wrong ones.
Well anyway I don\\\'t delude myself that this is going to be in any way popular, but the point is, if your favorite obviously-an-example was mutilated or taken down this wasn\\\'t out of judgment or malice, but because I really have no clue. Just put it back in and make sure to phrase it so it lays a coherent claim to be this trope.
