Follow TV Tropes

Following

Needs a rename so as not to conflict with the stock phrase: Getting Too Old For This

Go To

HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#26: Oct 3rd 2011 at 10:43:27 AM

12 to 0, in favour, as of this post. Time to call it, it seems. o.o

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#27: Oct 3rd 2011 at 7:44:22 PM

Noting for the record: Stock Phrases are not tropes of their own accord.

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#28: Oct 4th 2011 at 3:52:25 PM

I already said as much.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#29: Oct 4th 2011 at 5:53:49 PM

Yeah. The rename is fine, but we don't need any more "stock phrases."

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#30: Oct 4th 2011 at 7:20:33 PM

So do we just strike that part from the crowner or strike the entire thing and start it over?

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#31: Oct 4th 2011 at 7:45:11 PM

Any objections to proceeding with the rename without further mucking about with crowners?

edited 4th Oct '11 7:45:19 PM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
LouieW Loser from Babycowland Since: Aug, 2009
Loser
#32: Oct 12th 2011 at 6:03:39 PM

I think it is probably alright to go ahead with the rename process, but since there does not seem to be consensus for what the new name should be, I made an alternative titles crowner here to help sort that out.

However, staff members can obviously overrule me on this if they so choose.

"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d
Insignificant Since: Dec, 1969
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#34: Oct 21st 2011 at 7:02:39 AM

Time Waits For No Sequel is leading at 3.5:1

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Insignificant Since: Dec, 1969
#35: Oct 31st 2011 at 3:08:47 PM

Time Waits For No Sequel is still winning, but it's not quite far enough in the lead to call it a consensus. Needs more votes.

edited 31st Oct '11 3:09:16 PM by Insignificant

HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#36: Oct 31st 2011 at 8:21:28 PM

Time Waits For No Sequel just seems like a cheesy pun. Something like Character Aged with the Actor is Exactly What It Says on the Tin, making it more fitting.

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#37: Oct 31st 2011 at 8:51:29 PM

I don't see how Time Waits For No Sequel indicates the correlation between actor/character age.

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
OldManHoOh It's super effective. from England Since: Jul, 2010
It's super effective.
feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#40: Nov 9th 2011 at 12:22:37 PM

Kabumpety. It doesn't look like the consensus is going to change any, and I'd like to finally get this over with.

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
MetaFour Since: Jan, 2001
#41: Nov 9th 2011 at 6:52:12 PM

Yeah, calling this crowner.

LouieW Loser from Babycowland Since: Aug, 2009
Loser
#42: Nov 11th 2011 at 2:06:38 PM

Getting Too Old For This is now Character Aged with the Actor, the wicks should be fixed, and there are notes about the change on the Renamed Tropes page and in the renamed tropes thread. I sent a report to move the archived discussion found here. There was quite a bit of misuse for the stock phrase, so most of the examples were actually cut. Since that was the case, it is probably even more important that someone else checks my work here.

I am wondering if it is a good idea to keep Getting Too Old For This as a redirect since I think it might just encourage more misuse for the stock phrase.

"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#43: Nov 11th 2011 at 5:09:19 PM

I agree; bad idea to keep.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
MetaFour Since: Jan, 2001
#44: Nov 12th 2011 at 8:04:33 AM

Yeah, probably best to cut that one entirely.

Add Post

AlternativeTitles: GettingTooOldForThis
12th Oct '11 5:59:07 PM

Crown Description:

Previous crowner showed consensus support for a rename.

Total posts: 45
Top