Follow TV Tropes

Following

The Social Media Thread

Go To

By "social media" we mean any large computer network that allows people to interact in shared communities. The big ones of course are Facebook, Twitter (X), and Instagram, but we can't forget newer platforms like Discord and Slack.

Dedicated video sites are off-topic here and YouTube has its own separate thread.

What we should discuss in this OTC topic are news items, business operations, and activities by the networks themselves, not specific things posted by users. Those should go into threads appropriate to the subjects of those posts. For example, if an actor tweets about a film, we'd discuss that in the Media forum topic for the film, not here. If Facebook changes its policies, that could be discussed here.

The politics, motives, competency and wider business activities of the owners and leaders of social media companies (e.g. Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg) are also off-topic — except in situations where they are directly making specific policy for the platform.

Talking about a particular Instagram policy change (or a high-profile ban on a specific user) directly announced by Mark Zuckerberg would be acceptable in this thread, speculating about Zuckerberg's wider motivations wouldn't be.

The thread's also not about "dumb thing [public figure] said on [social media platform]". If there isn't a specific thread related to the subject of the statement (e.g. US Politics), then it's probably gossip and not worth talking about.


     Thread OP 
So, I was looking for a dedicated social media thread and apparently there was this one created back in 2020 that we never opened. Unfortunately, it's a little stale, so bumping it isn't going to work very well, but I would like to restart it. The reason I'm doing so is that the Computer Thread seems to have become the de facto place for this sort of talk, and it's a big tonal clash with talking about computer tech.

The hot topic of the day is Elon Musk's bid to acquire Twitter. We first discussed it in the Computer Thread, starting roughly here, and I am not going to rehash the entire discussion. Instead, I am going to resume from the last post:

CNBC: Twitter is reportedly taking another look at Musk takeover bid

Twitter's board is reportedly meeting with Elon Musk and may seek to negotiate on his buyout offer. Musk claims to have secured $46 billion in funding to buy the company at a valuation of $43 billion and is preparing to make a tender offer to its shareholders.

While the board has passed a poison pill, it could be facing resistance to that from groups of shareholders and will want to talk things out rather than face a hostile takeover. It's also possible that Twitter's stock could crash if the offer fails to go through.


Another possible topic was originally posted here.

Ars Technica: EU to unveil landmark law to force Big Tech to police illegal content

Following on from the recently passed Digital Markets Act, which requires large tech companies to unbundle first-party software from hardware platforms, the proposed Digital Services Act will require medium and large social media platforms and search engines to police hate speech and disinformation while adding additional protections for children against targeted marketing.

It also bans "dark patterns", which manipulate or trick people into clicking on ads or other content. The article doesn't explicitly say what that means, but I assume it includes things like disguising ads to look like parts of a site's user interface, hiding "close" buttons, and such.

For large companies, the requirements would go into effect immediately. For medium companies, they would have a grace period to implement the changes.

Thierry Breton, the EU’s internal market commissioner, has warned that Big Tech has become “too big to care.”

This phrase, "too big to care", intrigues me. It's an indictment of the idea that these companies have decided that growth and engagement metrics overwhelm any sense of social responsibility.

In my opinion, a law like this would be impossible in the United States, since it would be challenged (likely successfully) on First Amendment grounds.

Edited by Mrph1 on Dec 12th 2023 at 11:24:56 AM

Rabbitearsblog Movie and TV Goddess from United States Since: Feb, 2014 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Movie and TV Goddess
#15801: Apr 25th 2024 at 6:55:21 PM

Oh yeah, I forgot that Vine was a thing...

I love animation, TV, movies, YOU NAME IT!
BigBadShadow25 Owl House / Infinity Train / Inside Job Fan from Basement at the Alamo (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Drift compatible
Owl House / Infinity Train / Inside Job Fan
#15802: Apr 25th 2024 at 7:11:43 PM

Wait… did Twitter own Vine?

Update: I looked it up and yes they did.

Edited by BigBadShadow25 on Apr 25th 2024 at 10:15:38 AM

The Owl House and Coyote Vs Acme are my Roman Empire.
TheDarkMantis Shadow Bug from Ocean of Storms Since: Nov, 2017 Relationship Status: One Is The Loneliest Number
RedSavant Since: Jan, 2001
#15804: Apr 25th 2024 at 8:24:16 PM

In terms of tech, I think each video was constrained to about 6 seconds. That affected the culture too, since the (successful) Vine stars were the ones who put the effort in to refine their jokes and videos. Think of it like that Mark Twain truism about how a 3-page story is much harder than a 30-page story.

Tellingly, once Vine died a lot of them moved to platforms like Tiktok and without the time constraint, their jokes got a lot less polished and a lot less funny.

It's been fun.
Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#15805: Apr 25th 2024 at 10:25:17 PM

ProZD is the only former Vine star I know of, and his post-Vine sketches are still good (if extremely infrequent).

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
Blueace Surrounded by weirdoes from The End Of the World Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: Chocolate!
Surrounded by weirdoes
#15806: Apr 25th 2024 at 10:59:27 PM

Imagining how badly a Vine comeback would be botched, really.

Wake me up at your own risk.
Rabbitearsblog Movie and TV Goddess from United States Since: Feb, 2014 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Movie and TV Goddess
#15807: Apr 25th 2024 at 11:28:33 PM

Especially with how different things are today from when Vine first came out.

I love animation, TV, movies, YOU NAME IT!
fredhot16 Don't want to leave but cannot pretend from Baton Rogue, Louisiana. Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Don't want to leave but cannot pretend
#15808: Apr 26th 2024 at 9:16:30 AM

Imagining an internet without TikTok The potential Tik Tok ban is now law. What happens next?

Two days ago, the bill to force Tik Tok to separate from its Chinese parent company or face a nationwide ban had been signed into law by President Biden. Byte Dance now has 9 months (or one year, if Biden wishes to, just once extend the deadline) to sell Tik Tok and though the ban could be avoided with a successful sale or court challenge, Vox notes that Americans might want to start imagining an online world without Tik Tok.

Now, the article notes that the push to either ban or excise the platform from its owner has been around for years. For example, the Toilet Tantrum Tyrant announced plans to ban in the app in 2020 though, predictably, the bugger flipped and now thinks banning it is a bad idea (and that people should be mad at Biden about it, you get the drill). The threat of a ban, the article says, has always been "a little weird and complicated, drawing from a mixture of valid concerns and questionable moral panics about the ills of social media." The writer ( A.W. Ohlheiser) has even previously written that Tik Tok's moderation failures and data privacy concerns are hardly unique, "even as some lawmakers seem to persist in holding Tik Tok uniquely responsible for perpetuating them."

However, if you've paid attention to politics, something being signed to law doesn't mean that's the end of the story. Tik Tok CEO Shou Chew has said that "Tik Tok isn't going anywhere" and that he intends to challenge the law in the courts, on the basis of it being unconstitutional for violating the First Amendment. The U.S government would have to meet a high standard to prove that a ban is necessary to protect the nation's security and privacy to keep the law (which means nothing like "Yes, Tik Tok is not alone in what it does that has many people's concerns but you can't regulate the CCP"). Montana's statewide ban of Tik Tok (the almost childishly-easy to circumvent one, you remember that) was blocked by a federal judge last year as a likely violation of the First Amendment. 

"Why is this happening", the article asks. "Great question", the article answers. The lawmakers leading the charge have cited national security concerns stemming from the app's Chinese ownership-specifically, the possibility of the Chinese government accessing the data of American users and spreading propaganda or influencing foreign elections. Members of Congress refer to information they learned in security briefings about Tik Tok's potential to harm American interests "but the contents of those briefings are not public".An article by Bloomberg might be helpful for the quote. Critics, however, have noticed that the Chinese government could access a lot of the same data by simply buying it from a data broker. This linked article should better explain that.

The Vox article does note another angle, another driving force behind it. As the writer says that Vox had previously noted, the current push for a ban in Congress gained a lot of attention after a "viral but unfounded accusation" spread that Tik Tok was brainwashing America's youth with anti-Israel content in the first days of the October 7th War, a narrative that seemed to rekindle a lot of fears about Tik Tok's power as a propaganda tool.

"What changes if Tik Tok goes away in the U.S"? The next section starts off by noting that this isn't the first time a major force in internet culture has faced extinction ("rip Vine") but Tik Tok, arguably, is the most influential online platform in the U.S and won't be easily replaced, though other platforms will try to fill in the void. "As the Washington Post’s Will Oremus wrote," a Tik Tok ban would provide more space for the Meta formerly known as Facebook and Google to move in, as Meta has already adapted a lot of Tik Tok's features via Reels and Google has You Tube's Shorts but neither have quite the cultural force behind them that Tik Tok enjoys.The aforementioned article linked here.

A lot of bigger creators-those with resources, managers, and huge followings- would be able to jump onto another ship, if they haven't already, but everybody else is going to have a much rougher and more dramatic time. Earlier this year, Zari A. Taylor, a NC doctoral candidate who studies media and culture, explained "that the biggest loss to online culture if Tik Tok goes away will be in the uniqueness of how the platform promotes videos into user feeds." Tik Tok is good at recommending videos by accounts with small followings and makers who are often not professional content creators and they are most likely to lose their audience with the ban since they don't have the pull that could "help them evolve into other areas of the entertainment industry", Taylor says.

In some ways, the constant threat of a ban has already taken it's toll: after the first wave of ban threats back in 2020, Ohlheiser spoke with Ryan Beard, a creator who had nearly 2 million Tik Tok followers but the threat of a ban sent his livelihood into a spiral and forced him to accelerate his efforts to get views and followers on other apps. These days, he's all about stopped posting on Tik Tok and has instead become a commentary You Tuber.

"When Tik Tok rose in influence, it was better than any other app at showing users what they wanted to see, for better or for worse." While short, vertical-format videos might be available on any old platform these days, it's not the format that keeps people scrolling. 

The article concludes on a somber note: While some, like Beard, can turn their Tik Tok success into views on another platform, for many others, even the threat of a ban "is a harsh reminder of the realities of making content on the internet: Your livelihood is tied to the success and attention of platforms you don’t control".

Trans rights are human rights. TV Tropes is not a place for bigotry, cruelty, or dickishness, no matter who or their position.
BigBadShadow25 Owl House / Infinity Train / Inside Job Fan from Basement at the Alamo (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Drift compatible
Owl House / Infinity Train / Inside Job Fan
#15809: Apr 26th 2024 at 9:42:44 AM

[up] When you say Toilet Tantrum Tyrant, you mean Trump?

The Owl House and Coyote Vs Acme are my Roman Empire.
Ultimatum Disasturbator from Second Star to the left (Old as dirt) Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
Disasturbator
#15810: Apr 26th 2024 at 9:43:55 AM

I saw their wall of text and panicked

yes they meant Trump

New theme music also a box
fredhot16 Don't want to leave but cannot pretend from Baton Rogue, Louisiana. Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Don't want to leave but cannot pretend
#15811: Apr 26th 2024 at 9:44:08 AM

[up][up]Got it in one. I’m still imitating Colbert’s attempt before 2024 to not say the bugger’s name when making a reference.

Edited by fredhot16 on Apr 26th 2024 at 9:44:35 AM

Trans rights are human rights. TV Tropes is not a place for bigotry, cruelty, or dickishness, no matter who or their position.
Steven (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
#15812: Apr 26th 2024 at 9:45:56 AM

I think adding "Golden" to the moniker would have been an easier clue since Trump loves gold tongue

Remember, these idiots drive, fuck, and vote. Not always in that order.
BigBadShadow25 Owl House / Infinity Train / Inside Job Fan from Basement at the Alamo (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Drift compatible
Owl House / Infinity Train / Inside Job Fan
#15813: Apr 26th 2024 at 9:46:42 AM

I wonder how the kids are gonna react if this ban goes through…

The Owl House and Coyote Vs Acme are my Roman Empire.
Steven (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
#15814: Apr 26th 2024 at 9:47:39 AM

They'll find something else to gravitate towards.

Remember, these idiots drive, fuck, and vote. Not always in that order.
fredhot16 Don't want to leave but cannot pretend from Baton Rogue, Louisiana. Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Don't want to leave but cannot pretend
#15815: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:00:40 AM

I’m not sure about that…

The article mentions that while the likes of Google and Meta can take advantage, they don’t really have the same cultural force nor the ability to promote people that would normally get buried under other algorithms. To gravitate towards something else requires there to be something that can fill a similar purpose or fill a similar need.

Also, kids and content creators aren’t the only people who use Tik Tok.

Trans rights are human rights. TV Tropes is not a place for bigotry, cruelty, or dickishness, no matter who or their position.
MorningStar1337 Like reflections in the glass! from 🤔 Since: Nov, 2012
Like reflections in the glass!
#15816: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:06:57 AM

I'm pretty certain that kids would avoid Google and meta like the plague due to one crucial factor...age.

It's more likely they hop onto a new startup that would arise from TikTok's ashes instead. Something more hip, more trendy and not associated with the stuff their parents' generations dósent use.

fredhot16 Don't want to leave but cannot pretend from Baton Rogue, Louisiana. Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Don't want to leave but cannot pretend
#15817: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:20:43 AM

[up]Google has You Tube and I don’t think it’s become a kid-free zone.

A new startup? Well, it can’t just be trendy, it has to be able to appeal and fulfill desires in a way that other platforms don’t or couldn’t, even if by a difference of degrees, if it wants to be successful. As the article noted, Google and Meta have similar formats at hand but it is not the FORMAT that keeps people on.

Trans rights are human rights. TV Tropes is not a place for bigotry, cruelty, or dickishness, no matter who or their position.
MorningStar1337 Like reflections in the glass! from 🤔 Since: Nov, 2012
Like reflections in the glass!
#15818: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:23:43 AM

There is a difference between You Tube and You Tube Shorts.

Granted that does seem to be a possible exception, but that is more due to nigh monopoly that would get closer to shedding the nigh part with Tiktok gone.

HotelCalifornia Since: Jan, 2011
#15819: Apr 26th 2024 at 11:06:49 AM

[up]x6 Their hatred of old people will certainly be hardened.

Edited by HotelCalifornia on Apr 26th 2024 at 11:07:04 AM

fredhot16 Don't want to leave but cannot pretend from Baton Rogue, Louisiana. Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Don't want to leave but cannot pretend
#15821: Apr 26th 2024 at 11:46:58 AM

[up][up][up]I think we both agree that Google and Meta, as they are, are not likely to swoop in and pick up Tik Tok’s audience and creators with the greatest of ease but I think the question still bears asking: what, fundamentally, is the difference between You Tube and You Tube Shorts?

Specifically, in factors of the system of creator and viewer recommendations such as “being better than any other app at showing users what they wanted to see, for better or for worse” or “being good at recommending videos by accounts with small followings and makers who are often not professional content creators”?

Does the former work under a different algorithm than the latter? Does the latter have the capability to “Ti K Tokify” itself? Can it attract those lesser-known creators? What do we know about which demographic goes where?

Edited by fredhot16 on Apr 26th 2024 at 11:49:36 AM

Trans rights are human rights. TV Tropes is not a place for bigotry, cruelty, or dickishness, no matter who or their position.
HalfFaust Since: Jan, 2019
#15822: Apr 26th 2024 at 11:54:56 AM

Instagram Reels seem reasonably popular, although certainly not to the level of TikTok. You Tube Shorts... well, someone has to be watching them.

PhysicalStamina Since: Apr, 2012
#15823: Apr 26th 2024 at 12:22:15 PM

I'm gonna be honest, I fully expect a lot of what's left of Biden's youth support to crumble after this. Sure Tiktok technically isn't banned yet, but I've long list faith in people knowing/caring about the details of these things. All they're gonna see on their feeds is "BIDEN BANS TIKTOK" and say "screw him".

Demongodofchaos2 Face me now, Bitch! from Eldritch Nightmareland Since: Jul, 2010 Relationship Status: 700 wives and 300 concubines
Face me now, Bitch!
#15824: Apr 26th 2024 at 1:01:18 PM

Actually, the opposite's been happening, as Biden's support has actually increased in the past few weeks.

But anymore, and this will get into US Politics that is still banned here for now, so thats all from me.

Edited by Demongodofchaos2 on Apr 26th 2024 at 4:01:31 AM

Watch Symphogear
Mullon Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: And here's to you, Mrs. Robinson
#15825: Apr 26th 2024 at 1:07:50 PM

I question whether young people who wouldn't vote for Biden over this were ever going to vote for Biden.

Never trust anyone who uses "degenerate" as an insult.

Total posts: 15,947
Top