Five Nights at Freddy's

The death animations might very well involve those face plates opening up...

Well, we never did see how Springtrap killed us; that was left completely to the imagination.

Technically that's true of all the games. We only know the method of killing in 1 and 2 because it's explicitly mentioned by Phone Guy (and confirmed in the Game Over screens)

Considering who Springtrap it's likely horrible.....

New teaser.

Eurgh. That's genuinely creepy.

"There's a bit of me in every body." ...Does this mean the animatronics were made with pieces of Springtrap?

Is that supposed to be the ballerina? Is it a puppet head using wiring like tentacles to move around?

Also, there was stuff in the image's source code, and this is what people have made of it so far.

And yes, both Baby and Ballora are rather notably doing a private show on a Saturday.

edited 17th Jun '16 11:53:56 AM by Grounder

...gross. Is Scott really going there? Respect if he is.

I doubt that it's meant to be referring to Springtrap. That looks like a different robot from the others, since the nose is a ball and doesn't split it half like it does with all the others we've seen so far.

That animatronic does not look like any animatronic we have seen before....

That private Saturday thing could just be for a Birthday Party, probably not what your thinking. I mean it's possible as Baby and Ballora are human animatronics but I don't see it as likely.

edited 17th Jun '16 2:47:54 PM by Ecrivan

Not going to stop the SFM porn in the slightest.

If anything, it's (possibly unintentional) encouragement.

On the other hand, if Scott really is going there, and (at minimum) Baby and Balora are robot strippers, that puts a horrifying new meaning behind 'deep underground' and 'you don't know what we've been through', ESPECIALLY if these animatronics are also possessed by the souls of dead children.

Y'all are jumping on that bandwagon a bit quick considering the "clothes" are basically the robot casing, and in no way meant to truly simulate the human body. That would be a very particular kind of kink to cater to.

Basically I very much doubt this is what he's going for, or why anyone would respect him for that, Pushover???

Also what's SFM the acronym for? Single Female Mannequin?

edited 17th Jun '16 6:02:04 PM by AceofSpades

SFM stands for Source Filmmaker. Nude models are a dime a dozen for it. In any case, I don't think that's what he was going for but at the same time, I think he knows exactly what it looks like.

edited 17th Jun '16 6:09:01 PM by LordVatek

Private Parties could simply mean just more expensive birthday parties for the kids though. I mean it's not to far out of the realm of impossibility considering these animatronics are ridiculously advanced comparably even to the animatronics we have now but I don't quite see it.

The way Baby and Ballora are designed doesn't really seem too enticing to the adult mind for me.

I'm just theorizing if it happens to be true. It's probably not, but I know for a fact that some people have been speculating that the new place is a seedy 'adult' spin-off since the trailer first dropped.

All of you have your mind in the gutter.

Seriously, guys? The location in FNAF 5 might be a burlesque house of Robots? On top of that just being stupid, I don't think Scott Cawthorn would ever stoop that low, especially since he is a Christian guy who made Christian games before FNAF!

A Private Party can't just be a party for only certain people; it's gotta have the double meaning of having Black Jack and hookers involved, minus Black Jack!

Because Five Nights At Freddys is a horror series for kids, right? What with the child-targeting serial killer, pus and blood leaking from animatronics stuffed with the corpses of children, a child dying in the hospital from an animatronic crushing his skull in, and the aforementioned serial killer dying from metal rebar and electronics being smashed into his body from metal springs, who comes back to life as a zombie, with the bloody and mangled corpse still visible inside the thing.

None of that in any way points to also including sex robots in what I'd consider an incredibly immature way to include sex in a game. However, as all of these things are in universe intended to be entertainment for children, yeah, private birthday parties make a hell of a lot more sense.

And there's nothing in Dingo's comment that stated the game was for kids.

Lord knows this franchise has been sexualized enough by certain fans.

Except, if it's true, 'you don't know what we've been through' heavily implies that the game itself isn't sexualizing them, and would instead have heavy undertones of Shameful Strip and 'brothels are disgusting and horrible', which sounds very much like the kind of message a devout Christian would approve of. Also, both sex robots and stripper robots are totally real things that exist.

edited 17th Jun '16 7:31:55 PM by PushoverMediaCritic