SpookyPhotographs and SpookyPainting: the content?

Spooky Photographs seems to be about photographs that appear to be haunted. Spooky Painting discusses the same topic, yet with paintings. Still, when you read half of the entries in Spooky Painting you see a lot of examples about paintings that are just generally creepy, rather than stuff that appears to be haunted.

Should both topics be addressed and filled with examples in both articles? Or should they just be about seemingly haunted pictures?

As I understand it, they don't need to be explicitly haunted, but at least played up as if they are or are believed to be. By characters or narrative, not audience, naturally.