That is not true. You can base your opinion on any aspect of an image. But "the style is poor" is not a valid argument to try to convince anyone else.
It is a fact the art is crude. It is an opinion that is bad.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
No, the other one.
I find that the compression of the text makes it annoying to read. Which is rather bad for one that relies on the text.
Check out my fanfiction!
Hi
The Dot R pics do just as much with less, so ![[tdown]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Thumbs_down_emoticon_3571.png "[thumb down]"){kind=small}
to those...although if they're not already on the page as examples, they should be.
I will point out that they have the same number of words as the Monty Python pic.
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Okay, I'm going to try to get a scan from the OOTS book tomorrow. Even if it's not that great as an image, it should at least point the way to what to look for.
Hi
Morgan, I'll give you through the weekend to find that pic.
Hi
Alright, I'd say we've got a winner. The new pic's up, potholed, and tagged. Caption or no? I lean toward no.
No, the other one.
I lean against the same tree.
Check out my fanfiction!
iRidescence
I agree with leaving it captionless
It already has several captions. I agree.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Agree with no caption.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Hi
Done; locking up.
Crown Description:
Nominations for replacement images:
What it can be decrieded for, however, is that it has too much text.
(In case you're wondering, rodneyAnonymous, I wasn't as familiar with the rules as I had previously thought.
).
edited 13th Nov '13 1:12:00 AM by KarjamP