Follow TV Tropes

Following

Nintendo to stop revenue from Let's Plays

Go To

0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#326: Jun 25th 2013 at 12:46:52 AM

Oh yeah, it's a Kotaku article, so expect a terrible read. You probably shouldn't read the comments for your own sanity.
Heh, I have NoScript so the comments are inaccessible unless I allow them to show up anyway [lol]

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
absolclaw from a church on a hill Since: Jan, 2001
#327: Jun 25th 2013 at 1:21:34 AM

People basically forgot about this issue because the Xbox One pulled a worse FU to video gamers, and Nintendo and Sony basically waddled off to do whatever it is they do.

Holy Grail, huh? Cool story, bro.
0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#328: Jun 25th 2013 at 1:43:45 AM

Nintendo wandered off to wisely not involve itself in this generation's console war and instead cater to their built-in fanbase.

edited 25th Jun '13 1:44:21 AM by 0dd1

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
GaryCXJk Wants Captain N for SSBU Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
Wants Captain N for SSBU
#329: Jun 25th 2013 at 2:39:21 AM

Okay, I think I've got this now.

The reason Nintendo did this ad revenue thing isn't just because they're corporate greedbags or that they just wanted to protect their I Ps. Well, it is the latter, but here's where it gets more substantial.

Valve themselves had to specifically put in their policy that people could earn ad revenue from Source Filmmaker made films and even commercialize on them if it used all original assets. People were still allowed to earn ad revenue from content created with Valve assets, but they could not actually sell said videos.

A similar thing happened with Nintendo, they protected their I Ps this way. If they didn't, to what extend could people earn from their assets? I mean, if people used their characters in a fan film and proceed to actually sell that film, even though it doesn't contain any actual assets from any of their games, would that still be illegal? (Yes, yes it would.)

So, in this case, even the "but Let's Plays aren't like sharing films, we still do our own shit" argument becomes void because of the aforementioned. If Nintendo would just let the Let's Plays run loose, to what extent could people earn money from not just Let's Plays, but other types of Internet videos using the I Ps?

Signatures are for lamers.
absolclaw from a church on a hill Since: Jan, 2001
#330: Jun 25th 2013 at 2:41:26 AM

They will earn what, $3 a month?

Holy Grail, huh? Cool story, bro.
absolclaw from a church on a hill Since: Jan, 2001
#331: Jun 27th 2013 at 2:19:37 AM

Double post - apparently Nintendo changed their minds. Since everyone is doing a 180 on their controversial policies, maybe Sony will undo that PS+ online play thing :P

[1]

And a video from some guy who I heard the news from who tends to swear in some videos but I haven't watched today cuz lolinternetconnection

Holy Grail, huh? Cool story, bro.
Add Post

Total posts: 331
Top