Follow TV Tropes

Following

Sustainable Energy, USA and worldwide

Go To

Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#301: Jun 11th 2014 at 12:40:52 PM

Moving several hundred tons of metal at transonic speeds takes a ridiculous amount of energy.

TheHandle United Earth from Stockholm Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
United Earth
#302: Jun 11th 2014 at 12:50:43 PM

Trains! We need more trains! Less flying, more railway! I mean holy energy expenses, Batman!

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Achaemenid HGW XX/7 from Ruschestraße 103, Haus 1 Since: Dec, 2011 Relationship Status: Giving love a bad name
HGW XX/7
#303: Jun 11th 2014 at 1:06:12 PM

According to Wikipedia, the largest variant of the Boeing 747 is about 76 meters in length, 69 meters from side to side, and flies at up to 988km/h (274m/s) with a thrust of 296kN per engine, which comes to 81MW per engine or 324MW in total useful power. Its bounding box, as seen from directly above, comes to about 5244m2. Multiplying that by the solar constant (the theoretical upper limit on the natural light flux from the Sun anywhere on the Earth) gives you only about 7.1MW. In other words, even this very liberal estimate of the solar power available still falls short of the turbofans' power by over 45 times.

So it's not even a case of "if we had the materials and the tech", it's just physically impossible? Shame.

Excellent post, though, very informative for non-science literate people like me. [tup]

[up]

Insufficiently dangerous. Live a little, baby!

edited 11th Jun '14 1:06:40 PM by Achaemenid

Schild und Schwert der Partei
Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#304: Jun 11th 2014 at 1:59:02 PM

CPV can hypothetically be used to do it, although I don't really know how it would work on a plane.

Qeise Professional Smartass from sqrt(-inf)/0 Since: Jan, 2011 Relationship Status: Waiting for you *wink*
Professional Smartass
#305: Jun 11th 2014 at 4:09:36 PM

So it's not even a case of "if we had the materials and the tech", it's just physically impossible? Shame.
That is with the current airplane design, and for continuous flight. I doubt continuous flight would be required, plus new designs could have increased surface area and better aerodynamics. Also not all of the planes motors would need to be solar. But yeah, for that kind of planes the solar motors would be just for assistance.

Laws are made to be broken. You're next, thermodynamics.
tclittle Professional Forum Ninja from Somewhere Down in Texas Since: Apr, 2010
Professional Forum Ninja
#306: Jun 11th 2014 at 4:42:41 PM

I could also see airplanes charging up and using solar power (along with wind power) as ways of keeping enough energy to not have to use as much power.

"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#307: Jun 11th 2014 at 4:53:49 PM

I'm not sure who first said it, but it is still true: We don't have an energy production problem. We have an energy distribution problem.

Another way to say it is that we have an energy storage problem.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
demarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#308: Jun 11th 2014 at 5:42:41 PM

It might work on an airship.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#309: Jun 11th 2014 at 6:03:36 PM

A dirigible?

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
tclittle Professional Forum Ninja from Somewhere Down in Texas Since: Apr, 2010
Professional Forum Ninja
#310: Jun 11th 2014 at 7:45:48 PM

I could easily see a dirigible covered in solar panels or in a material that absorbs solar energy without setting off whatever is keeping it afloat.

"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."
joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#311: Jun 11th 2014 at 8:21:20 PM

Could be done. You'd want light materials, but could likely make it work. Could act as a cargo ship over land.

I'm baaaaaaack
rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (USA) (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love
KnightofLsama Since: Sep, 2010
#313: Jun 12th 2014 at 12:04:48 AM

I could easily see a dirigible covered in solar panels or in a material that absorbs solar energy without setting off whatever is keeping it afloat.

Though with helium, you don't even have to worry about that.

But most dirigibles, that big structure up top isn't just a gas bag. It's more of a shell for the lifting gas cells inside that ideally shouldn't come in contact with the outer skin.

demarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#314: Jun 12th 2014 at 6:00:43 AM

Depends on what type it is. But yes, you generally dont have to worry about the gas inside. Weight is the larger concern. You only need to produce enough energy to power forward movement, since the gas does the work of suspending the blimp in mid-air.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#315: Jun 12th 2014 at 6:59:25 AM

Dirigible engines are about 300HP (or ~224KW). You need at least two. Call it 500KW. With a surface area well over that needed to produce 7MW and battery technology well capable of holding sufficient juice to at least station-keep overnight, a solar powered dirigible seems very possible with no advances needed in current art.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
TheHandle United Earth from Stockholm Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
United Earth
#316: Jun 12th 2014 at 7:30:48 AM

Cool Airships are cool.

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
demarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#317: Jun 12th 2014 at 7:08:34 PM

The Age of the Zepplin Must Return!

rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (USA) (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love
rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (USA) (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love
Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#320: Jun 14th 2014 at 3:36:55 AM

Vanadium: The metal that may soon be powering your neighbourhood — A solution to the problems of Solar Panels providing too much power at the wrong time.

Keep Rolling On
rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (USA) (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love
Cronosonic (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#322: Jun 19th 2014 at 8:15:51 AM

Alternatively...

These guys are working on a smaller-scale plasma-focus fusion power generation method using hydrogen and boron that is tiny compared to ITER (laboratory size, according to the page), and they've started an Indigogo campaign to get important materials to reach a crucial milestone.

They have cautioned that it'll take at least a few years with a much larger project to create a fully-working generator, and while their goals are rather lofty, if they pull this off, the benefits could be enormous.

edited 19th Jun '14 8:17:06 AM by Cronosonic

rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (USA) (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love
TheHandle United Earth from Stockholm Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
United Earth
#324: Jun 19th 2014 at 1:39:29 PM

[up][up]That sounds like Movie!Iron Man's reactor.

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (USA) (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love

Total posts: 1,169
Top