Does Not Illustrate: Censorship By Spelling

The trope is somebody (e.g. a parent) spelling a word to prevent someone else (e.g. the children) from understanding it. The image is a baby spelling words with alphabet blocks. It's a cute picture but it has nothing to do with the trope.

Clearly a reaction to exactly that, with those examples. Not the best, but "nothing to do with" is quite an exaggeration. Suggested improvement?

Current:

edited 17th Jul '12 4:58:29 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Non-picturable?

Surely a panel from a comic could work. There are a few examples listed, none of them contain links though. I'll try to find them.

^^ Are you saying the baby dinosaur is worse than nothing? Seems fine.

Garfield example (somewhat better than the current I think, but not that great since it only works if you know Garfield's a glutton. With a caption maybe?):

edited 17th Jul '12 6:24:23 PM by bananasloth

That works.

edited 17th Jul '12 7:33:43 PM by cfive

Much better.

Garfield FTW.

I support Garfield.

\+1 to Garfield.

One or two more votes for Garfield and we can waddle with it.

+ for Garfield.

edited 19th Jul '12 6:53:33 AM by DarkConfidant

And there we go. The pic's up, potholed, and tagged; caption at will. Locking up.

edited 19th Jul '12 6:58:31 AM by Willbyr