No, really.
Cool Dude
The skirt seems to be covering up almost all of it. You gotta look reaaaaaaaally closely to see it. Okay to me.
edited 8th Jul '12 7:46:13 PM by Raidouthe21st
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)
Doesn't look like a child either.
Maybe that's just because there is no other character in the picture for perspective. Looks like a highschool age girl to me. (Never seen the show).
TBQH, it's 1mm of panties or her more Stripperiffic costumes. I'd go with this.
Honestly, what? I'm surprised that this even needed a thread.
Ok, let's keep it then. I wasn't quite sure about it, that's why I mentioned that in the P5 cleanup thread.
Gentleman Troper!
I have no problem with this image.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Hi
This
◊ is about the best alternative I've been able to find; other than that, I'm good with the current pic.
The current image doesn't look that risque unless if you squint. Though if things get out of hand I like the suggested image that Willbyr posted.
edited 9th Jul '12 6:39:21 AM by DFighter
I can't think of anything good for a signature.
She looks too curvy to look too young. And as said, you have to squint to see anything you normally shouldn't.
The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.I found a very similar image: [1]
◊
Or we could just Photoshop those few white pixels and call it a day.
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
Sure, that works
I agree. The same caption would work.
Sure, why not?
The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
Hi
rodney's pic is swapped in. This looks done; locking up.
edited 10th Jul '12 9:41:11 AM by Willbyr
Yes, this image is safe for work, but there's no 'hey, in the p5 cleanup thread someone asked if the image might be a bit...much for tvtropes so I started a thread' tag. You can see a mm of a child appearing girl's underwear. OK to keep?