Discussion of religion in the context of LGBTQ+ rights is only allowed in this thread.
Discussion of religion in any other context is off topic in all of the "LGBTQ+ rights..." threads.
Attempting to bait others into bringing up religion is also not allowed.
Edited by Mrph1 on Dec 1st 2023 at 6:52:14 PM
As long as your not trying to make everyone else follow it ain't nothing wrong with it. You can adhere as much as you want, forcing others to do so is wrong.
Any Churches celebrating the increasing legalization of gay marriage on the news?
edited 15th May '13 6:15:51 PM by Wildcard
METAL GEAR!?
Happy New Year!
You got no idea how wrong that sounds
Anyway while I personally like the sense of social stability from having traditional familia roles. They are a form oppression for people who don't fit into the accept social conventions of the heteonormal mould.
I'm not just talking about LGBT relationships. Pretty much anyone who deviates from the norm gets it.
hashtagsarestupid
It is oppressive for many who don't fit. The need for everyone to be have the same kinda family units can hurt people.
edited 15th May '13 6:17:15 PM by Wildcard
METAL GEAR!?
vicarious
Hmmmmmm. I'd eat it. Beats the hell out of bland communion wafers (sorry Catholics, I know it's not the point, but it tastes bad 
).
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
Someone's not being very cheerful, or helpful...(people in article not the poster)
edited 17th May '13 11:11:19 AM by lordnyx
NCC - 1701
Lashes? Lashes?? You kidding me?
It was an honor
Cephalopod Lothario
Someone's still living with a pogrum mentality.
NCC - 1701
I was getting a Roman public execution vibe myself.
It was an honor
Even more ironic. The same tools used to kill jesus are now the tools used to hurt and kill by followers of Jesus.
NCC - 1701
I literally have no words.
You have five of them right there.
Princess Ymir's knightess
Yes, but adding "except those" sounds dumb.
NCC - 1701
Wise guys. 
But no, there's something horrifically WRONG that people are "beating people" in God's name. If they'd actually read the Bible they'd realize how unamused God is by this.
It was an honor
Princess Ymir's knightess
Yes, they should at least stone them!
True. I don't see a single retrieved foreskin anywhere.
NOT THE BEES
That wasn't God, it was King Saul. Who was trying to get David killed in the process.
edited 21st May '13 2:23:56 PM by Pykrete
Princess Ymir's knightess
Hey, did you know?
◊ Jesus would never touch his vagina. Especially not to girls!
Mikon :3
Jesus could be a hermaphrodite who identifies as male. The bible doesn't say he isn't.
Given that he's supposed to be God in human form, that would actually make more sense.
Princess Ymir's knightess
Not really.
If there's a God I seriously doubt that. God probably doesn't have a clear shape. And seriously, why would freakin' God need genitals?
Because we were made in its imagine and since we have genitals...
But Gabrael, But adhering to accepted social profiles is a form of social oppression!
Any we should probably get back onto homosexuality and religion.
edited 15th May '13 5:42:39 PM by joeyjojo
hashtagsarestupid