I think you swapped the trope name and the topic name by accident.
I dunno. Isn't the whole "unicorns are only tamable by virgins" thing ingrained enough for the "this woman is a virgin" implication to work?
edited 27th Jan '12 9:12:53 AM by ShadowHog
Moon◊Seems to be a stock virgin power to me.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickDarn, I still do that.
I was never made aware of this unicorn-virgin connexion so, to me, it's just "woman on a horse". I just don't see how it shows she's a virgin... plus I swear it's not even an example.
EDIT: Just been made aware of the new JAFAAC != insta-pull. Fair dos.
edited 27th Jan '12 11:29:50 AM by Jicragg
I can live with the current.
She is not an example, she can ride the unicorn because she is not human. And as far as I remember her being a virgin or not is never important to the plot.
edited 27th Jan '12 12:57:45 PM by Osmium
I'm okay with it.
Fight smart, not fair.It isn't misleading at all, so there's no reason to pull it, but it would be better to have a picture that actually shows you what the trope is about.
I think it's bad because the caption does all the work, and we can't assume everyone knows unicorns do this (since not all works with them mention it directly).
A proper picture likely really would need dialog or text stating that someone is a virgin, and that some power or privilege comes from that.
edited 31st Jan '12 4:34:24 PM by DragonQuestZ
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.You don't get more virgin-powered than being able to ride a unicorn. This seems perfect for the trope.
Clock is set.
This is going to be hard to picture. Any suggestions?
Clock's up; locking for inactivity/lack of consensus. No action is to be taken based on this thread.
Vote to pull. It's a blonde on a unicorn.