#2: Jan 19th 2012 at 10:21:28 PM
It shouldn't be limited, but sadly I've never seen the original.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
I see the Awesomeness.
#3: Jan 19th 2012 at 11:12:46 PM
You can hardsplit the page if you want. If you do, make sure you put the disambiguation on Gone In Sixty Seconds and redirect the main.
Fight smart, not fair.
Raso
Cure Candy
Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#4: Jan 19th 2012 at 11:15:30 PM
Shouldnt they be labeled with years?
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
"In distress", my ass.
#5: Jan 20th 2012 at 4:58:19 AM
That is the usual method, yes. In this specific case:
- Film/GoneInSixtySeconds1974, custom titled to "Gone in 60 Seconds (1974)"
- Film/GoneInSixtySeconds2000, custom titled to "Gone in 60 Seconds (2000)"
(As for sixty vs 60, IMDB uses "60" for the 1974 movie
and "sixty" for the 2000 movie, but the poster shots of both use "60".)
edited 20th Jan '12 5:00:38 AM by Nohbody
All your safe space are belong to Trump
Total posts: 5
Is there a good reason to limit this to the 2000 version? All it says in that regard is
Unfortunately, I don't know enough about either version to do a soft split of the article, and list tropes for both movies.
My troper wall