![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
But that's not applicable here and shouldn't matter to us one bit.
The Other Troper
It actually is. If people didn't like even this single option, they would vote it down, the same way they vote down single prop options on crowners (and I actually think that happened once). They are instead voting up this one.
Except people DO like the option, and this ISN'T a crowner down in the red, which makes the point you're trying to make irrelevant to the thread.
Now, back to the topic that's really at hand here, can we just call the crowner now? The one option given to vote on is well-liked and good enough as is, and nobody is showing any interest in offering alternatives.
edited 15th Jan '12 12:23:19 PM by SeanMurrayI
The Other Troper
Actually, I misread your post on #23. It thought you were questioning the validity of a crowner with only one option. I didn't realize you were stating the crowner was clear even with one option.
I didn't realize you were essentially agreeing with my argument. So "oops" on my part.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
So, does this mean we should make the analogous TRS for Twilight Zone Twist?
Belief or disbelief rests with you.
That might be good next step.
I think it would. There's space in the TRS. Go ahead and make the thread.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Grand Poobah of Crimestrikers
So is there enough consensus on Cruel Twist Ending to start the renaming process?
"But... nobody told me I needed a signature!"
Yes there is. Please rename. Thank you.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Grand Poobah of Crimestrikers
It's done. Thanks, everyone!
Locking.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Crown Description:
Previous crowner
showed consensus support for a rename.
