It's a great example, especially since it zig-zags (is that the right kind of Playing With? not sure): the problem isn't that she's the wrong flavor of human, it's that she's not human at all. Funny. Bad page image though, not demonstrative.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Just two faces and a caption. Support pull
Supporting pull
My troper wallI appreciate that no image is often better than a bad image, but, I'd prefer to replace it. Any proposals?
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Hmm, nothing specific, but I think a mixed couple with someone glaring in the background is an obvious suggestion. Any examples of that jump to mind?
Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!The first place I look is usually in the Examples (GIS almost never helps me, usually capture directly from the work), but nothing I am familiar with would make a good page image.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Simple solution:
edited 27th Dec '11 8:33:48 AM by SalFishFin
The image is behind the "no" sign is kinda pixellated, and the fact that it's forbidden seems because of the racial differences isn't really clear. It looks more like "no marriage" rather than "no mixed marriage".
Reaction Image RepositoryClock is set.
Clock's up; locking for inactivity/lack of consensus. No further action is to be taken based on this thread.
Motion to pull
This is a character reaction trope and nothing in the picture even remotely shows anything about reactions. Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - Camacan