zlqq2144
Since: Mar, 2011
#2: Dec 4th 2011 at 6:38:38 AM
Depends on the specific situation. For example (off the top of my head), a developing nation that needs to catch up fast may want a single/few leader system because it is more efficient. But of course, who that 'one' leader is can matter a lot and often it just comes down to specific situations or just pure luck...
Total posts: 2
Have a look at this dilemma. I feel there is no right answer: all of the positions have massive openings for abuse... The "one-leader" option seems to be the most practical, but really, can one person have the final word in all those decisions and still know what the hell they are doing?
I don't want to set the world on fire, baby. I love you too much. I just want to start a big, big flame in your heart.