Follow TV Tropes

Following

Ongoing European Debt Crisis

Go To

Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#2876: Nov 30th 2014 at 12:21:12 AM

[up] What about Junker's investment plan?

Keep Rolling On
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#2877: Nov 30th 2014 at 8:56:00 AM

Yes, it's all about those horrible stinking Greeks. Because the Greek economy is the linchpin of the Eurozone, apparently, it justifies imposing savage austerity on the entire region just to punish them. Punish, literally: beat them into submission; teach them to pay their taxes and keep their books clean. Destroy their economy to make a moral point.

And while we're at it, let's beat up the Spanish, Italians, French, Portuguese, Irish, and just about everyone else. Never mind that the crisis is almost entirely the making of German bankers in the first place. Everyone in Germany is too busy chanting "Deutschland Uber Alles" to bother to crack open an economics textbook.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#2879: Nov 30th 2014 at 2:26:09 PM

[up] Hasn't Jean-Claude Junker launched an European Union investment plan?

Never mind that the crisis is almost entirely the making of German bankers in the first place. Everyone in Germany is too busy chanting "Deutschland Uber Alles" to bother to crack open an economics textbook.

I thought it was Bankers in the City of London?

edited 30th Nov '14 2:26:47 PM by Greenmantle

Keep Rolling On
SilasW A procrastination in of itself from A handcart to hell (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
A procrastination in of itself
#2880: Nov 30th 2014 at 2:50:00 PM

The global crisis was due to bankers in New York and the "Would be better as a carpark" City of London. However the argument can be made that the Euro crisis itself is only as bad as it is due to the interests of German banks being prioritised over the interests of the actual citizens of the Euro zone.

“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran
Zarastro Since: Sep, 2010
#2881: Nov 30th 2014 at 3:17:29 PM

"Yes, it's all about those horrible stinking Greeks."

Please don't imply that this is my opinion. I have nothing against Greeks on a personal level.

"Because the Greek economy is the linchpin of the Eurozone, apparently"

Not really, but it doesn't matter how important they are in theory. People started to doubt the survival of the Euro once it became apparent that Greece was in deep trouble. It was more at stake than just the European economy, it was also about the European project as a whole.

" it justifies imposing savage austerity on the entire region just to punish them."

Austerity is the only doable way of letting them remain in the Euro. It was either that or having them leave the Euro. Now no one knows for sure what this would have meant for them, but it would have affected Greece badly either way.

"beat them into submission; teach them to pay their taxes and keep their books clean."

This would be a nice side-effect yes. Greece as a state will never properly function unless there are some major changes.

"And while we're at it, let's beat up the Spanish, Italians, French, Portuguese, Irish, and just about everyone else."

All those countries begged for help which Germany provided. Besides you can't seriously include France in your list since they have done pretty much the opposite of austerity so far.

" Never mind that the crisis is almost entirely the making of German bankers in the first place."

And Poland started WWII... . Just because you repeat this false claim doesn't make it any truer. For instance French banks borrowed Greece almost as much.

I am not denying that Germany bears some fault for the current situation. Germany should have vetoed Greece's ascension to the Eurozone, but European politics have always been a bit simbolical, and it was assumed back then that Greece, as the birth-place of European civilization should be part of the Euro.

Furthermore Germany broke together with France the Maastricht-criteria for the first time and thus set a bad precedence. While the reasons for doing so were understandable (German reunification was far more expensive than anyone could have predicted, and properly integrating East-Germany and thus preventing any radicalism to spread there was also in Europe's interest), it undermined the old treaties and shouldn't have been done.

But Germany is certainly not responsible for the weakness of the Greek economy, or forcing their politicians to borrow more than they could pay back.

"Everyone in Germany is too busy chanting "Deutschland Uber Alles" to bother to crack open an economics textbook."

It is true that Germany started to pursue her national interest and becoming a "normal" country just when the Euro-crisis started. There is however no reason to use such insulting comparisons like you do. Besides it is frankly hilarious when countries like e.g. France demand a more utilitarian approach from Germany to European policies since France has always put her interests before Europe. And as a recent interview with Wolfgang Schaeuble revealed, German politicians are actually listening to advice from economists. Just not from alarmists like Krugman's who is notorious now for having little insight into European politics and making wrong predictions about the life-span of the Euro. There is no viable to austerity if one wants to save the Euro, anyone who knows the basics about European and German politics would acknowledge this.

Of course it is easy to propose ex post would should have done to solve a certain problem. Some people say that the UK and France should have invaded Germany when Hitler let the German army march into the demilitarized Rhineland. But any historian will tell you that it would have been next to impossible for any British/French politician to get their people to support such an action. The same goes for the current situation. Even if European/German were interested in Krugman's advice, they simply could not follow him since his suggestions are simply impossible to implement given the political realities in the different countries.

@Greenmantle: "What about Junker's investment plan?"

Sounds good to me, but I've heard there are some doubts whether or not this will work.

@ Silas: "However the argument can be made that the Euro crisis itself is only as bad as it is due to the interests of German banks being prioritised over the interests of the actual citizens of the Euro zone."

Perhaps, but one could also argue that the survival of the Euro and the success of the European project is in the interest of every European country. Yes, even Greece.

edited 30th Nov '14 3:19:55 PM by Zarastro

SilasW A procrastination in of itself from A handcart to hell (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
A procrastination in of itself
#2882: Nov 30th 2014 at 3:34:08 PM

Austerity is the only doable way of letting them remain in the Euro.

"Just because you repeat this false claim doesn't make it any truer."

Why can't Greece be allowed to stay in the Euro with a massive crack down on tax evasion alongside quantitative easing by the ECB as required? If Greek banks were going to fail due to shoddy practises why couldn't they be nationalised? And I don't mean the half assed nationalisation that we did here in the UK, I mean proper "we're in large and everyone responsible for this mess is fired" nationalisation.

Perhaps, but one could also argue that the survival of the Euro and the success of the European project is in the interest of every European country. Yes, even Greece.

Sure, but austerity isn't doing that. The Euro Zone is closer to collapse than ever, the European project has become more hated than ever before in large part due to the austerity being imposed. The interests of the German banks aren't the interests of the Euro zone, they're the opposite, they're what's killing the Euro zone and the European project s a whole.

edited 30th Nov '14 3:38:04 PM by SilasW

“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#2883: Nov 30th 2014 at 3:38:04 PM

Or even fiscal stimulus to fix the core economic problem that's keeping their GDP depressed in the first place. The austerity that Germany is forcing on the Eurozone is exactly the opposite of the correct policy for escaping the zone's depression.

edited 30th Nov '14 3:39:02 PM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
LogoP Party Crasher from the Land of Deep Blue Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: You can be my wingman any time
Party Crasher
#2884: Nov 30th 2014 at 3:39:18 PM

At this point, I think my country (Greece) should leave Euro altogether. Our entrance in the Eurozone was hastily done and fishy from the start anyway. Cooked books, people willing to overlook these cooked books, shady dealings, empty promises & half-truths. Caused more harm than good. After a period of artificial "prosperity", of course.

But yeah, I don't think much can be gained from us remaining in the Eurozone any longer. Society has reached a breaking point, economy is stagnant as ever and all the cash has dried-up note . The proposed "changes" are unfeasiblenote  and, ultimately, unnecessary. Simply because they are just ain't gonna stick.

It is sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane.
Zarastro Since: Sep, 2010
#2885: Nov 30th 2014 at 3:54:01 PM

"Sure, but austerity isn't doing that. The Euro Zone is closer to collapse than ever,"

The Euro was close to collapse in 2012. Now it looks relatively stable.

"Or even fiscal stimulus to fix the core economic problem that's keeping their GDP depressed in the first place."

Southern Europe is suffering from structural problems and a fiscal stimulus would only postpone solving these problems in the future. Besides the ECB can't act this way due to the treaties. And the German government could never support an open breach of the treaties since that is just what eurosceptic politicians in Germany are waiting for.

"Sure, but austerity isn't doing that. The Euro Zone is closer to collapse than ever, the European project has become more hated than ever before in large part due to the austerity being imposed."

This is going to change in a few years once the recovery fully sets in. People would also hate the European project if European insitutions would act outside of the rules of the treaty, so there is no quick solution to this.

edited 30th Nov '14 3:56:23 PM by Zarastro

Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#2886: Nov 30th 2014 at 3:59:35 PM

@ Fighteer: Do you know about this?

Keep Rolling On
LogoP Party Crasher from the Land of Deep Blue Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: You can be my wingman any time
Party Crasher
#2887: Nov 30th 2014 at 4:04:45 PM

     
"This is going to change in a few years once the recovery fully sets in."

If I had a dime for everytime I heard this, I would've paid off the national debt by now.

edited 30th Nov '14 4:05:07 PM by LogoP

It is sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane.
SilasW A procrastination in of itself from A handcart to hell (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
A procrastination in of itself
#2888: Nov 30th 2014 at 4:18:07 PM

This is going to change in a few years once the recovery fully sets in.

Can you define "a few years" for me? I fully expect to still be posting on TV Tropes in 3-4 years time and I'd like to hold you to this prediction if 3-4 years fits your timeframe.

“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran
PotatoesRock Since: Oct, 2012
#2890: Dec 1st 2014 at 5:24:24 AM

(FT, Wolfgang Munchau) The Juncker fund will not revive the eurozone: Wolfgang says that the fund is very similar to a synthetic collateralised debt obligation, a financial instrument that is basically a Rude Goldbergian device that attempts get something for nothing.

This is the plan: the commission starts off with €8bn within its existing budget. It sets aside that money as collateral for a guarantee of €16bn. The rationale underpinning this leverage is that not all the projects will fail at the same time so you can guarantee more than you actually have. Fair enough. The European Investment Bank adds another €5bn to this guarantee. Up until this point, I am not worried. The EIB is a conservatively managed institution with plenty of buffers. The EIB could use the €21bn to raise some €60bn in cash by issuing bonds. That would be a second layer of leverage. The air is getting thinner, but I am still not that concerned. It could then use the €60bn to co-finance €315bn in investments from the private sector. At that point, the original €8bn will have been levered three times and by a total factor of almost 40.

The final stage – from €60bn to €300bn – is the most important and least certain one. Say, for example, the EIB wants to invest in a €10bn energy project between France and Spain. It puts in an equity investment of €2bn; private investors supply the rest. If losses occur, the EIB bleeds first. Such a construction could work. The cash comes in advance because of the first-loss guarantee protecting private investors. The leverage ratio is five-to-one – ignoring for the moment that the EIB’s equity contribution has already been leveraged twice by that time.

This structure would ensure the best outcome. But I fear that, instead of putting upfront cash into a project, the EIB may merely issue a guarantee. This would lead to three problems. Without upfront cash, it might be hard to attract investors. If the project makes a loss, how much is the guarantee worth? Can the guarantor refuse payment, for example, if fraud is involved? Is the guarantee subject to any form of political or legal interference? The advantage of upfront cash is that it disappears automatically when losses arise. The guarantee would first have to be invoked.

Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission, has provided details of the commission’s plans to kickstart investment spending in Europe and seed growth. The guarantee has a second weakness. The economic purpose of capital is not only to cover risk, but also to provide upfront liquidity to a project. When cash is there, it makes it easier to raise additional cash, and allows the project to start earlier.

The third problem is more fundamental. Mr Juncker wants to encourage €300bn in investment over three years, which translates to roughly 0.8 per cent of the EU’s gross domestic product per year. This would make a difference. But even if he manages to achieve this headline number, it is not clear that he will have prompted new investments.

The problem with all EIB lending is that we never know how much net new investment it induces. Of course, we know what it lends, and the total amount of co-funding from the private sector. But some of that would have taken place without the EIB. For a small business loan, for example, the difference in interest rates between an EIB-sponsored loan and a commercial loan can be as little as 0.5 per cent. The test of this programme is not whether Mr Juncker can claim his €300bn target, but whether private sector investment in the eurozone rises by an additional 1 per cent per year. I can confidently predict that this will not happen.

Mr Juncker’s fund could turn out to be both a bureaucratic triumph, and an economic non-event. And that would be one of the better outcomes.

My overall conclusion is that there will be no fiscal stimulus in the eurozone, not even an indirect one. The overall fiscal stance will continue to be mildly contractionary.

The heavy lifting will have to come from the European Central Bank – in the form of sovereign debt purchases. For this to work, a programme of quantitative easing will have to be drawn up that is quite different in spirit from Mr Juncker’s €300bn programme. It will have to go on for as long as it takes, and it will have to involve real money upfront, and no guarantees, and no tricks. The eurozone needs a truly grown-up response if growth is to be revived.

Wolfgang's again a leftist economist, so clearly ignore.

edited 1st Dec '14 5:25:43 AM by PotatoesRock

Zarastro Since: Sep, 2010
#2891: Dec 1st 2014 at 9:31:05 AM

Can you define "a few years" for me? I fully expect to still be posting on TV Tropes in 3-4 years time and I'd like to hold you to this prediction if 3-4 years fits your timeframe.

According to some articles I've read it was estimated by the German financie minister in 2013 that Europe should return to growth by the end of 2017. Now this assumption was obviously made without taking into account the impact of a possibly new Cold War, but I'd still stick with it since even I now that there have to be some positive results after such a long period of more or less strict austerity.

So yes you may hold me accountable then. I think that austerity could be called a success if by 2018 the Euro still exists, without any member state having left, and with Europe having returned to at least moderate growth and declining unemployment rates.

@Fighteer: You have to admire Krugman's persistency, he certainly likes to stick to his narrative of the "German problem". Whatever Germany's economic situation might look like, it is always German policies that threaten Europe. In his entertaining article "WHY GERMANY KANT KOMPETE" (1999) he criticized the bad shape of the German economy, because:

"For Germany is supposed to be the economic engine of the new Europe; if it is a drag instead, perhaps the whole train in the wrong direction goes, not so?"

Now it is supposedly the opposite. In your article, he fails to mention a few important details which he had acknowledged perviously:

Since the euro came into existence in 1999, France’s G.D.P. deflator (the average price of French-produced goods and services) has risen 1.7 percent per year, while its unit labor costs have risen 1.9 percent annually. Both numbers are right in line with the European Central Bank’s target of slightly under 2 percent inflation, and similar to what has happened in the United States. Germany, on the other hand, is way out of line, with price and labor-cost growth of 1 and 0.5 percent, respectively.

He fails to mention that before! 1999, Germany had seen a very sharp rise in labor costs (which he acknowledges in his article from 1999).

the sheer quality of some German products, the virtuosity of German engineering, have allowed the country to remain a powerful exporter despite having the world's highest labor costs.

Thus Germany merely "corrected" a trend that made her increasingly uncompetetive on the world market. Which is another aspect he fails to acknowledge. Germany is not just having a race to the bottom with other European countries in terms of labor costs, Germany is competing internationally with the rest of the world. Germany and Europe needs to stay competetive globally which is one aim of German policy.

edited 1st Dec '14 9:31:47 AM by Zarastro

Achaemenid HGW XX/7 from Ruschestraße 103, Haus 1 Since: Dec, 2011 Relationship Status: Giving love a bad name
HGW XX/7
#2892: Dec 4th 2014 at 11:28:49 AM

Draghi: "We don't need unanimity" for QE and bond-buying.

In other words: it will happen with or without Berlin's support. This is encouraging. He's talking the talk, it remains to be seen if he walks the walk.

As for the German objections, well: das Leben is kein Ponyhof.

Schild und Schwert der Partei
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#2893: Dec 5th 2014 at 11:29:42 AM

@Zarastro: When Germany underwent her labor cost correction, there was plenty of room in the brand new Eurozone to maneuver. Monetary policy wasn't up against the zero lower bound, in particular, which meant that the correction didn't require deflation and a reduction in living standards.

The same economic rules simply don't apply here. Germany cannot continue to pursue sub-1 percent inflation and expect the other Eurozone nations to deflate their economies to restore competitiveness. It's not mathematically possible, ideology be damned.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#2895: Dec 14th 2014 at 2:32:45 PM

Frankly, I'm hoping that Syriza kicks the other parties' asses; Greece — Europe, even — is in desperate need of a strong leftist voice.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Quag15 Since: Mar, 2012
#2896: Dec 14th 2014 at 2:41:38 PM

[up]If Podemos gets a strong position in Spain in their next elections, said leftist voice will get stronger.

edited 14th Dec '14 2:42:06 PM by Quag15

Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#2897: Dec 14th 2014 at 2:46:57 PM

[up][up] The strongest anti-austerity voices in Britain are in the regional parties: The SNP in Scotland and Sinn Fein in Irelandnote .

Keep Rolling On
Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
Quag15 Since: Mar, 2012
#2899: Dec 15th 2014 at 6:16:16 AM

I still can't believe Belgium will have or is having austerity measures. Surely they're better than France, right?

Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#2900: Dec 15th 2014 at 7:00:01 AM

Everywhere in Europe has had austerity measures. I doubt even Scandinavia is immune.

Keep Rolling On

Total posts: 4,401
Top