Nope, and watermarked pics are an instant pull, so...any ideas for a replacement?
Sadly not a clue, I just knew we cannot use stuff with watermarks. Which is a pity 'cause it wasn't too bad a pic. I was half hoping it could be rescued in some sort of way, but I freely admit to having no clue how.
For me, there's not enough of a distinction between them.
Clock is set.
"The current pic has a really distracting watermark through it. Anyway to remove it?"
Can't be done.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
1 Second picture from bottom.
edited 31st Dec '11 4:39:06 AM by Blurring
If a chicken crosses the road and nobody else is around to see it, does the road move beneath the chicken instead?While removing a watermark can be done with enough care and skill, doing so is not ethical or legal, and doesn't change the fact that we are using an image that the copyright holder has very strongly indicated they do not want used without permission.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.This. It's not exactly a wholesome thing to do.
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartAgreeing with and ; far better to just ignore watermarked pics altogether.
That second pic is good.
Bambam and Pebbles (?) without bug:
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.I like that one.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.I can do no wrong, for I do not know what it is.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Brilliant.
The Flinstone pic works, though the babies are pretty small.
Like 12.
If a chicken crosses the road and nobody else is around to see it, does the road move beneath the chicken instead?+1 for #12
Another vote.
The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.A couple more votes and we can run with it.
I'm Nthing.
The Flinstones picture is actually a better illustration than the previous picture. I support it.
Good enough. The pic is up, potholed, tagged, and the example is crosswicked. Locking up; if you wanna add a caption, go for it.
The current pic has a really distracting watermark through it. Anyway to remove it?