description versus examples: Abuse Is Okay When It Is Female On Male

I agree with the above, but the description (see: the very first post of this discussion thread) is that female-on-male abuse is "good" and "justified" because females are morally superior. The examples on the page however, seem to be far more skewed towards instances where female-on-male abuse is blown off as not really all that big a deal, not very harmful, and most of all, not traumatizing to the man. So yeah, saying okay = harmless is true, but in this trope description, it seems to be saying okay = a good thing. "Okay" has lots of meanings.

edited 12th Nov '11 7:23:13 PM by sagittarius

I have to say, the description has been vastly improved by the various edits here. (Great work, guys.) It really was a total screed, and I believe it encouraged people to word all of their entries in the most outraged fashion possible. If we could clean those up a bit, I personally would be satisfied with the repair.

Guessing at the motives for a trope's existence is a very tricky business at times. Is it "okay"? Is it "harmless"? The only thing we're sure of is that it's different.

edited 18th Nov '11 8:59:26 PM by Tyoria

Motives notwithstanding, it's "less objectionable". That's probably enough to make a trope.