According to this photo's caption, it depicts a busty, hot 17-year-old. Now, I'm not going to complain about 17 being below the age of consent in some states or whatever... I'm just going to ask why we went with a picture that reveals neither hotness nor bustiness? Instead, we put a headshot of a girl with pigtails and pink ribbons.

I didn't recognize the character, so I clicked on the link... apparently, this is from a Disney Channel show. I therefore doubt that it provides any fanservice for post-pubescent viewers, let alone a good example of Ms. Fanservice.

To clarify: fanservice is the "gratuitous display of characters in skimpy clothing, or none at all." It's not perverse sexual lust or fetish fuel.

Motion to pull

There's nothing in that pic that remotely says "fanservice"

Seconded, I thought the same thing. You can't have fanservice without the body.

I would suggest either Donna Douglas from The Beverly Hillbillies, Christina Hendricks from Mad Men or Nikki Cox from Unhappily Ever After. Three excellent examples.

Second, for reasons given in the OP.

Third and pulling.

Pulled.

Previous:

edited 28th Aug '11 6:59:46 AM by Deboss

The first thing that came to mind was a collage of Troi, Seven of Nine, and T'Pol from their respective Star Trek series.

First one that came to my mind was Daisy Duke of Dukes Of Hazzard

Pic◊

edited 28th Aug '11 8:19:47 AM by Servbot

She's another great example...hell, I'd be happy with that pic.

Great classic example. Very nice pic.

I believe MAD described those shorts as "Cut right up to the censor limits." or something similar in their parody of the original The Dukes Of Hazzard.

edited 28th Aug '11 10:27:38 PM by Camacan

Bump...any objections to Daisy?

Hearing none, Daisy's up, potholed, and tagged; I used the Mad Magazine pic for the caption. Locking up.