Looks like we can choose to either take up Earnest's offer to move them to analysis then put in the new subheadings, delete them and put in the new ones, or keep as is. Any opinions?
Tsundere pet.
I like the writeup in post 45; the list of every possible animal metaphor can go to analysis.
Calling someone a pedant is an automatic Insult Backfire. Real pedants will be flattered.
Diagonalizing The Matrix
Bump. Are we going to do something about this?
Pretentious quote || In-joke from fandom you've never heard of || Shameless self-promotion || Something weird you'll habituate to
Jupiterian Local
Oh, hey, I forgot about this thread. I still like my writeup from back in post 6
; the main issue seems to be what to do with the current animal descriptions. I personally don't have a problem cutting them, but that upsets some people since a lot of work went into them, so I'd say dump them in the Analysis subpage.
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
I agree. Put in new writeup, drop the excess into analysis. I think that's fitting.
edited 9th Feb '12 1:12:36 PM by frodobatmanvader
The edit has been done.
I have moved the convoluted parts to analysis, where they don't cause any real harm. With nothing else to address, hollering.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
locking as requested.
I'd like to add that I cannot for the life of me extract what this trope means from reading the article. And there is seemingly no connection between the intro and the descriptions of animals. It comes off as completely non-sequitur.