At the YKTTW, Septimus said that description concerns should go here, so:
Is the "no one else in the world will assist them" element really required? Because that really isn't obvious from the name, and seems overly specific. If that's just a standard way it plays out, maybe it can be phrased to not sound like a requirement?
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Part of the problem is that nobody showed up to rewrite the description from the video game specific one, so I did it even though I am not an expert in description rewrites.
Anyway, apart from this description thing-o, do we still need this thread? "Save the World" Climax has now 37 wicks and only a few examples less. Saving the World has a decent amount of non-videogame examples.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanOk, I fixed up the description. Now, unless someone brings up another issue, I'll within some time request a lock here, since this thread slot is needed for other repairs as well.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanLooks good to me. It really isn't that hard to write an above-average trope description. Start by saying what the trope is—rather than what it isn't, or what circumstances might lead to it, or throwing out a bunch of hypothetical examples and hoping people will figure out what part of them is the trope—and you're already going to be doing better than far-too-many trope descriptions. :)
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Locking per request.
Crown Description:
What would be the best way to fix the page?
Ok, "Save the World" Climax is now up to 33 examples and wicks, and Saving the World is up to 23 non-videogame examples. Is this enough?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman