The Other Troper
#2: Apr 29th 2011 at 3:36:54 PM
Those are allowed. The description is limiting them.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
captainpat
Since: Sep, 2010
Chengar
Since: Sep, 2010
#4: May 28th 2011 at 9:07:38 PM
So, we need to re-write the description so that it covers things like sequels, spin-offs, or just a massive increase in fanservice over the course of a series?
A pocketful of saudade.
#5: May 28th 2011 at 11:00:12 PM
I'd say so. I see no reason to limit it to remakes, since there are many legitimate examples in the form of sequels, prequels, etc.
The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.
Total posts: 5
The description seems to imply that this trope is for works that are remakes. The problem is that most of the examples on the page aren't remakes. We've got sequels, spin-offs, works that add progressively more Fanservice with each installment, and works that tropers have deemed "sexier versions" other works they have no relations with. Also, I'm not sure how strict or loose the term remake is, but I think for a work to be a remake it has to use the same medium.
Just a suggestion, but perhaps it would be best to limit this trope to works that add more sexual content with each installment or sequel.