AskThePhatMan
Since: Jan, 2017
#2: Jan 14th 2017 at 6:47:48 AM
I'm not sure which one I like better. The way this episode was originally written and portrayed, I think they intended for Frank Costanza to be a more noble character. As they developed him, his getting an award (and running something for a charity) seems a little out of character. So inserting the Stiller mannerisms takes away from the plot of this episode while making it more consistent with the series.
Total posts: 2
I finally saw the original version of the Seinfeld episode where John Randolph plays George's father Frank, instead of Jerry Stiller. I wanted to post a comparison for those who haven't seen the original version.
There are three scenes with Frank in each version.
Scene #1: Frank has just found out his car's been wrecked.
Scene #2: Frank is getting his award.
Scene #3:
Which version is funnier? Well, Jerry Stiller is obviously more fit for the role. But, I think some of the yelling parts he does in this particular episode don't really fit. They sound forced. Most likely because Frank's dialogue was originally written for someone more laid-back. The only part that sounds natural is the "DE-LI-VER IT TO HER" part.
Also Stiller looks like he could be Jason's father. Randolph looked a little too old for the part, like maybe he was George's grandfather.
I'd say the Stiller version is better. Not so much because it gels more with continuity, just because Stiller is funnier. Still it's nice to have a copy of the Randolph version for completists sake.
Which version do you guys prefer?
edited 29th Apr '11 1:16:31 PM by Brandon
With all the memes about women choosing a bear over a man, Hollywood might wanna get on an 'East of the Sun and West of the Moon' adaptation