So my big magnum opus (not AB!Beowulf comic, the other one, with Jack Clive in it) is meant to read like it was written by an author in 2050 for readers in 2050 and after, a reconstruction of a "true story" taking place between 2039 and 2045.
Over half of the is the reconstruction in prose narrative, but the rest is emails, news articles, journal entries (from the author's research notebook) and other documents. The purpose of the documents is to elaborate on an important element of the story which cannot be done in the narrative alone.
Thing is, I've never actually put any thought into the author who puts the story together and writes it, since he/she is not a character in the story. The author is ambiguously me, and, in fact, the letters are written to my name.
I really don't want to embellish the author/me into an actual character because the author is only the messenger, but must I do so? Will the audience be looking for this, or will they accept that the author is only the author?
Banned entirely for telling FE that he was being rude and not contributing to the discussion.
I shall watch down from the goon heavens.