Damn Blockbuster Bomb vs a Block Buster Bomb didn't think of that... I almost want to say use it anyway as the fact that Block Buster Bomb was literal these were huge and filled with conventional explosives and one was suppose to bust a street block.
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!For some reason, Blockbuster Bomb is blueshifted.
Fight smart, not fair.Well, to be extra careful I made a single proposition rename crowner here. I agree that BFB should be renamed since it is not a preexisting term and its name is not indicative of the trope.
If someone who knows more about this kind of thing than I do believes we should go straight to Alternative Titles, I would be open to doing that given how old this topic is.
"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 dI wonder, if the only problem of Big, Bulky Bomb is it may gives to wrong impression about its shape, couldn't it be solved with a different page image? Currently, we just have a "big bomb". However, if we change to image to a huge pile of dynamites, the readers will notice the thing in the image is an example. They will also know that a single, bulky, bomb is (probably) an example as well, due to the name of the trope.
The definition of "bulky" actually includes all of those. Plus having a smooth bomb as the picture would help make it clear that it includes bombs of any shape, as long as they are huge.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.There is now an alternative titles crowner for this trope here. I tried to include all of the names mentioned in this thread, but if I missed one, feel free to add it.
"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 dThink we can call this?
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.Totally missed this one... not that it matters, but I added my last-minute vote to the top option.
I think it's fair to call it, given its age.
Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.I'm locking the crowner and calling this. Let's get it moved.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickIf you're changing all the wicks, feel free to change it on my page as well.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.I am changing them, after dinner.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickDo not worry about doing that, the wicks have been fixed * . The laconic page has also been placed on the cutlist with a new one being created in its place.
edited 10th Aug '11 5:13:54 PM by LouieW
"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 dThanks Louie. I just noticed that when I went to get at them. I'll lock this up then.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Crown Description:
Vote up for yes, down for no.
Well the fact that I confused them makes it likely others would, and that it still wouldn't show the trope.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.