Follow TV Tropes

Following

Thor

Go To

Nightwire Since: Feb, 2010
#326: May 15th 2011 at 4:09:15 PM

Just saw it yesterday. I enjoyed it better than Iron Man. And Loki is one of the more interesting villains I have seen recently. I kind of feel sorry for him at the end. But I have to admit that Thor's Character Development felt a bit too rush, and the romance subplot was decent but awkward and unnecessary.

Also, I don't get The Stinger. Was Loki disguising himself as Selvig or was he controlling him?

edited 15th May '11 6:11:34 PM by Nightwire

faradayangel electrifying from Gallifrey Since: Nov, 2010
electrifying
#327: May 15th 2011 at 8:15:46 PM

[up] controlling him I think

Humour, where would we be without it? In Germany, probably
blueharp Since: Dec, 1969
#328: May 15th 2011 at 8:29:50 PM

I was curious about that myself, but I realized it doesn't matter either way.

Scardoll Burn Since: Nov, 2010
Burn
#329: May 16th 2011 at 10:44:16 AM

Saw it, liked it. It's obvious they put some real effort in this one.

Loki was a very nicely developed character.

Fight. Struggle. Endure. Suffer. LIVE.
willyolio Since: Jan, 2001
#330: May 16th 2011 at 3:16:18 PM

good movie. not quite as good as Iron Man but well above The Incredible Hulk, I guess. the flip-flopping between Asgard and Earth was paced pretty well, so it didn't feel confusing, which is a pretty nice feat.

Starting to see a lot more cameos and references to the other Marvel films, which I'm kind of unsure about. I know they want to build up to the Avengers movie, but if they keep doing this more and more, the marvel movie-verse could quickly become as "exclusive" as the comics are. Most of them are pretty hard for a newcomer to just jump into and enjoy without being forced to read/watch from the beginning.

the only main gripe i have about the film is that the whole jotunheim battle scene was way too dark. Yeah, he's the evil/icy world, but I could barely see what was going on, damnit.

Scardoll Burn Since: Nov, 2010
KillerBunny666 Since: Jun, 2010
#332: May 20th 2011 at 10:41:15 AM

I don't know why everyone tought the romance was badly done, I tought it was pretty average and there was some chemistry between them, it wasn't great but not something that really counts as a negative point to me.

I do agree that Thor's character development was rushed, in fact it almost seemed like just decided he would act all noble as a Xanatos Gambit to get his powers back but it seemed like they couldn't drag the movie longer so as to justify that so I think it's forgivable atleast.

I tought it was a great movie, but it wasn't iron man great.

:)
RichReeders Official Muffin Watcher from Watching this muffin. Since: Feb, 2011
Official Muffin Watcher
#333: May 20th 2011 at 5:10:12 PM

He's thor. It hurth when he thands up or thits down. He needs to thee an orthopedithist.

edited 20th May '11 5:10:52 PM by RichReeders

Don't you try anything, you baked good you.
dontcallmewave Brony? Moi? surely you jest! from My home Since: Nov, 2013
Brony? Moi? surely you jest!
#334: May 20th 2011 at 5:13:23 PM

Excuse me while I strangle the above poster for that pun.

He who fights bronies should see to itthat he himself does not become a brony. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, Pinkie Pie gazes Also
AXavierB Since: Jan, 2001
#335: May 20th 2011 at 6:26:47 PM

I loved it, though I also found the romance subplot painful. Mostly because every action movie has one and it's become cliche and predictable. I knew it was coming the second the two met.

Loki was a really interesting villain, yes. Can you really blame him for feeling inferior to Thor when even their friends sided with Thor even after how reckless he was? We must have left the theater before this stinger everyone was talking about, though.

Also, Thor's shirtless scene. FFFF—

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#336: May 20th 2011 at 6:32:04 PM

Romance doesn't belong in action movies.

Fight smart, not fair.
AXavierB Since: Jan, 2001
#337: May 20th 2011 at 6:36:22 PM

Agreed but Hollywood doesn't seem to think so.

My thoughts at the start of the movie. "An attractive female character! Love interest."

Watchtower Since: Jul, 2010
#338: May 20th 2011 at 6:50:26 PM

Well you were either gonna have Thor trying to get in bed with Sif or Thor trying to get in bed with Jane. And you had to have at least one or the comic fans were gonna bitch.

Personally I didn't mind it too much, if only because it didn't feel as forced as it usually is in other movies.

willyolio Since: Jan, 2001
#339: May 20th 2011 at 7:00:06 PM

then he should have gone with both. Throw in the research assistant girl, too. he's the motherfucking god of thunder.

just do something different.

edited 20th May '11 7:00:25 PM by willyolio

Noimporta Since: Jan, 2001
#340: May 20th 2011 at 7:17:12 PM

Romance doesn't belong in action movies.
I feel the concept of the romance was not bad in itself, as it strengthens the scene in which Thor destroys the Bifrost, it's just that it was executed poorly.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
willyolio Since: Jan, 2001
#342: May 20th 2011 at 7:39:09 PM

yes, it definitely helped make the destruction of the Bifrost a much more personal decision for Thor.

it kind of took me by surprise when he goes from "drinking like a god" to "cooking breakfast" with one scene in between. and then "willing to sacrifice himself" a few minutes after that. That section was rushed.

RichReeders Official Muffin Watcher from Watching this muffin. Since: Feb, 2011
Official Muffin Watcher
#343: May 20th 2011 at 9:40:31 PM

Excuse me while I strangle the above poster for that pun.

Don'tcha mean "thtrangle", thport?

Don't you try anything, you baked good you.
AtomJames I need a drink Since: Apr, 2010
I need a drink
#344: May 20th 2011 at 10:07:46 PM

Oh thutup!

Theres sex and death and human grime in monochrome for one thin dime and at least the trains all run on time but they dont go anywhere.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#345: May 20th 2011 at 11:02:07 PM

Reminds me of how Ultimate Ironman paid Thor ten million dollars to stop using the speech style. Technically, it was to a charity.

Fight smart, not fair.
Maridee from surfside Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
#346: May 21st 2011 at 11:33:07 AM

I think the only real problem with the romance was that it wasn't given enough time to develop and grow. We barely got to know Jane, and by extension neither did Thor. None of the humans were really all that well-developed - they got, like, a couple scenes to show their personalities. The movie was about Thor and Asgard, so I think it doesn't ruin the movie - but it would be more enjoyable if there were more interaction with Earth.

Suppose the lack of interaction is better than crappy interaction, tho. 'Swhat fanfiction is for.

ophelia, you're breaking my heart
Vanitas Since: Jan, 2013
#347: May 23rd 2011 at 12:25:04 AM

So how is Thor gonna be on Earth for The Avengers. Unless some of the time is gonna be spent on him being transported here

Nightwire Since: Feb, 2010
#348: May 23rd 2011 at 12:27:53 AM

It is suggested at the end of the movie that the people on Earth are trying to make their own version of the Bifrost.

willyolio Since: Jan, 2001
#349: May 23rd 2011 at 12:31:33 AM

oh, question for the people who actually read the comics: what was that object that was shown in The Stinger?

Prowler I'm here for our date, Rose! Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
I'm here for our date, Rose!
#350: May 23rd 2011 at 12:31:56 AM

It was the Cosmic Cube.

It can do lots.


Total posts: 440
Top