Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / EscapeFromTomorrow

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DontShootTheMessage: While there are many reasons to criticize Disney in real life, many reviewers including WebVideo/JennyNicholson and WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera find the film's take on the subject far too abstract and tactless to hold any water.

to:

* DontShootTheMessage: While there are many reasons to criticize Disney in real life, many reviewers including WebVideo/JennyNicholson and WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera find the film's take on the subject far too abstract and tactless to hold any water.weight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DontShootTheMessage: While there are many reasons to criticize Disney in real life, many reviewers including WebVideo/JennyNicholson and WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera find the film's takes on the subject far too abstract and tactless to hold any water.

to:

* DontShootTheMessage: While there are many reasons to criticize Disney in real life, many reviewers including WebVideo/JennyNicholson and WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera find the film's takes take on the subject far too abstract and tactless to hold any water.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DontShootTheMessage: While there are many reasons to criticize Disney in real life, many reviewers including WebVideoJennyNicholson and WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera find the film's takes on the subject far too abstract and tactless to hold any water.

to:

* DontShootTheMessage: While there are many reasons to criticize Disney in real life, many reviewers including WebVideoJennyNicholson WebVideo/JennyNicholson and WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera find the film's takes on the subject far too abstract and tactless to hold any water.

Added: 252

Changed: 24

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hopefully this time the entry is less complain-y. (For the record, I am not a fan of Disney, especially after how badly they mishandled the Star Wars franchise.)


* DontShootTheMessage: While there are many reasons to criticize Disney in real life, many reviewers including WebVideoJennyNicholson and WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera find the film's takes on the subject far too abstract and tactless to hold any water.



* FanNickname: Since the "other woman" Jim sleeps with was never given a real name, WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera refers to her as "emu woman,"[[note]]Because of her claim that Jim was eating emu[[/note]] which was even the name used for her on the main page for a while. [[WebVideo/JennyNicholson Jenny Nicholson]] simply refers to her as “Sexy Mom”.

to:

* FanNickname: Since the "other woman" Jim sleeps with was never given a real name, WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera refers to her as "emu woman,"[[note]]Because of her claim that Jim was eating emu[[/note]] which was even the name used for her on the main page for a while. [[WebVideo/JennyNicholson Jenny Nicholson]] WebVideo/JennyNicholson simply refers to her as “Sexy Mom”."Sexy Mom".

Added: 73

Changed: 71

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing indentation


* {{Squick}}: The slow-motion, first-person shot of the girl spitting in Jim's face.

to:

* {{Squick}}: {{Squick}}:
**
The slow-motion, first-person shot of the girl spitting in Jim's face.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DancingBear: While the film has garnered mixed-to-negative reception, much of the hype stems from the fact it was almost entirely shot at the actual parks, without Disney noticing.

to:

* DancingBear: While the film has garnered mixed-to-negative reception, much of the hype stems from the fact it was almost entirely shot at the actual parks, without Disney noticing. Disney seemed to have realized this, and made absolutely no move to block the film... thus depriving it of a lot of the publicity it appeared to have counted on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I'm not a Disney Stan or hater by any means but this is complaining


* DontShootTheMessage: Even Disney's staunchest critics would have a hard time recommending this film due to its lack of subtlety, rampant factual errors, and pretentiousness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Now an index disallowing examples.


* AcceptableTargets: The wheelchair-bound man whose kid trips Sara is a "fat tourist"-type with a notable "hick" accent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Forgot to mention that "to some" is Weasel Words that could be applied to almost anything.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse. If it's only "an implication", then it wasn't direct enough to be Anvilicious. Also, the second entry is unabashedly negative, on top of being an unnecessary reviewer reference.


* {{Anvilicious}}:
** To some who read the film's message as one akin to Creator/{{Disney}} being an evil corporation. In fact the line "Bad things happen everywhere...especially here." really lends itself to this.
** As WebVideo/SomeJerkWithACamera points out in his review of the movie, there's also the implication that the movie is [[AntiEscapismAesop saying that adults who enjoy the escapism of Disney are delusional losers who refuse to grow up]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's a scene featuring a shot featuring the Disneyworld castle and a statue of Walt Disney that pans up to show the word "JESUS" written in the sky. A visual comment on the religious-level fanaticism surrounding Disney, or an incidental shot of a random skywriter (Christian ones in particular not being uncommon around Disneyworld) the filmmakers threw in [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotDidactic because it looked meaningful]]?

to:

** There's a scene featuring a shot featuring the Disneyworld castle and a statue of Walt Disney that pans up to show the word "JESUS" written in the sky. A visual comment on the religious-level fanaticism surrounding Disney, or an incidental shot of a random skywriter (Christian ones in particular not being uncommon around Disneyworld) the filmmakers threw in [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotDidactic because it looked meaningful]]?meaningful?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, Jim's lust for the teenage French girls, whom Randy Moore mentions in an interview are around ''15 to 16 years old.'' In her review, [[WebVideo/JennyNicholson Jenny Nicholson]] even mentions that one of the girls has visible braces, [[YoungerThanTheyLook making her adolescence even more apparent,]] which means that Jim somehow being unaware of their youth is not a very likely possibility. The scene of them eating bananas is even more uncomfortable with this in mind.

Top