Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / RogueJuror

Go To

OR

Added: 13607

Changed: 31653

Removed: 13841

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


%%%
%%
%% The examples section has been alphabetized. Please add new examples in the correct place in accordance with Administrivia/HowToAlphabetizeThings.
%%
%%%



[[folder:Comic Strips]]
* A 2014 ''ComicStrip/{{Crankshaft}}'' arc has Crankshaft serving on a jury for a man charged with endangerment for recklessly burning papers in his backyard on a dry, windy day. Most of the jurors think it's open and shut -- Ed believes it's exactly what any normal person would do and can't possibly be illegal.
* A 1994 ''ComicStrip/{{Doonesbury}}'' arc dealt with the tobacco executives who claimed under oath that they did not "believe" nicotine is addictive, despite the vast amounts of evidence to the contrary. In the strip, the executives are prosecuted on perjury charges. Every member of the jury is convinced they are guilty, except for Jeremy Cavendish, who can't decide if the executives are "monsters or idiots." The other jurors argue with him for a long time and he eventually agrees the executives are guilty. He later reveals his change of heart was motivated by his desperate need to visit the restroom.
[[/folder]]



* The TropeCodifier is ''Film/TwelveAngryMen''. A rogue juror (#8) is the sole holdout [[NotablyQuickDeliberation on a case which appears to indicate]] that the accused is definitely a murderer. However, as the jury is forced to analyze the evidence in detail, they slowly discover that almost all of it is flawed in some way. Worth noting that, unlike some other examples, the rogue juror isn't convinced of the suspect's innocence either. He just wants to make sure they've done their job properly, as the accused is facing a mandatory death sentence. It leaves the question of the suspect's guilt or innocence ambiguous in the end. However, because there was reasonable doubt, a verdict of "not guilty" is appropriate.[[note]]Interestingly, while #8 is trying to get everyone else to do their job properly, he is not. Conducting your own investigation and bringing a weapon into the jury room are both serious juror misconduct. This leads to a bit of ValuesDissonance between laypeople and legal professionals watching the same film[=/=]play.[[/note]] Towards the end of the film, Juror #3 becomes this for the other side, after all the other jurors have decided there's enough doubt that they can't justify a guilty verdict.
** The film has been remade several times and even has foreign adaptations. The Chinese adaptation is specifically framed as a Western-style mock trial, as China doesn't have jury trials (at least not even close to what the US has), and the film ends with the moral that the Chinese system (read: flagrant classism and bribery) is better. The Russian adaptation is pretty faithful, except it ignores one crucial difference in jurisprudence: in Russian jury trials, a jury only has to deliver a unanimous verdict during the first 3 hours of deliberation. After that, a majority verdict is sufficient, so if at least 7 jurors still voted guilty, that would have been the verdict.

to:

* The TropeCodifier is ''Film/TwelveAngryMen''. A rogue juror (#8) is the sole holdout [[NotablyQuickDeliberation on a case which appears to indicate]] that the accused is definitely a murderer. However, as the jury is forced to analyze the evidence in detail, they slowly discover that almost all of it is flawed in some way. Worth noting that, unlike some other examples, the rogue juror isn't convinced of the suspect's innocence either. He just wants to make sure they've done their job properly, as the accused is facing a mandatory death sentence. It leaves the question of the suspect's guilt or innocence ambiguous in the end. However, because there was reasonable doubt, a verdict of "not guilty" is appropriate.[[note]]Interestingly, while #8 is trying to get everyone else to do their job properly, he is not. Conducting your own investigation and bringing a weapon into the jury room are both serious juror misconduct. This leads to a bit of ValuesDissonance between laypeople and legal professionals watching the same film[=/=]play.[[/note]] Towards the end of the film, Juror #3 becomes this for the other side, after all the other jurors have decided there's enough doubt that they can't justify a guilty verdict.
**
verdict. The film has been remade several times and even has foreign adaptations. The Chinese adaptation is specifically framed as a Western-style mock trial, as China doesn't have jury trials (at least not even close to what the US has), and the film ends with the moral that the Chinese system (read: flagrant classism and bribery) is better. The Russian adaptation is pretty faithful, except it ignores one crucial difference in jurisprudence: in Russian jury trials, a jury only has to deliver a unanimous verdict during the first 3 hours of deliberation. After that, a majority verdict is sufficient, so if at least 7 jurors still voted guilty, that would have been the verdict.verdict.
* This is how ''Film/ErnestGoesToJail'' starts out. A henchman of bank robber Felix Nash realizes that one of the jurors at his murder trial, Film/ErnestPWorrell, looks exactly like his boss. He arranges for the jurors to visit the prison where the crime was committed, after which Nash knocks out Ernest and changes places. After that, Nash insists on finding his henchman innocent, keeping the henchman from getting his sentence upped to life, and then Nash walks out of the courthouse a free man, leaving Ernest in jail to serve out Nash's sentence (of death).
* A non-courtroom example in ''Film/TheInternship'': Lyle takes a stand for the heroes by defending their awkward internship application against the other members of the council who want them out immediately.



* In the film, ''Film/{{Suspect}}'', a juror not only holds onto the notion that the murder suspect is innocent, but he also passes information to the defense attorney, then meets with her in person and helps her with her case, actions that would likely get her disbarred in real life. {{Lampshaded}} and {{discussed}} in the film, with the trial judge warning her about this after seeing the pair near each other, but he has no proof.
* How the movie ''Film/ErnestGoesToJail'' starts out. A henchman of bank robber Felix Nash realizes that one of the jurors at his murder trial, [[Film/ErnestPWorrell Ernest P. Worrell,]] looks exactly like his boss. He arranges for the jurors to visit the prison where the crime was committed, after which Nash knocks out Ernest and changes places. After that, Nash insists on finding his henchman innocent, keeping the henchman from getting his sentence upped to life, and then Nash walks out of the courthouse a free man, leaving Ernest in jail to serve out Nash's sentence (of death).
* In the Margaret Rutherford ''Film/MissMarple'' film ''Murder Most Foul'', Miss Marple is the only juror who believes a suspect is innocent and causes a hung jury. She then goes to examine the case herself.
* A non-courtroom example in ''Film/TheInternship''. Lyle is taking a stand for the heroes by defending their awkward internship application against the other members of the council who wanted them out immediately.
* [[DownplayedTrope Downplayed]] in ''Film/RunawayJury'': the rogue juror's task was simply to make the other jurors follow their own predilections rather than actively changing their minds.
* In the early Creator/AlfredHitchcock whodunnit ''Film/{{Murder}}'', the jury at Diana Baring's murder trial initially includes seven "guilty" votes, three "not guilty", and two undecided. However, the two undecided jurors and two of the "not guilty" voters are almost immediately persuaded to vote for conviction, so that the rest of the deliberation embodies the "rogue juror" setup as the lone holdout, Sir John Menier, tries to explain why he doesn't think the evidence against Diana adds up. But as he is unable to do so convincingly, he is ultimately browbeaten into voting "guilty".

to:

* In ''[=McBride=]: The Chameleon Murder'', the film, ''Film/{{Suspect}}'', pilot for a juror not only holds onto the notion that the series of murder suspect is innocent, but he also passes information to mystery movies broadcast on the Creator/HallmarkChannel, the titular [=McBride=], an ex-cop turned defense attorney, then meets with her in person and helps her with her is the sole dissenting voice for acquittal for a woman charged for murder. After a mistrial, when the DA pledges to retry the case, actions that would likely get her disbarred in real life. {{Lampshaded}} and {{discussed}} in [=McBride=] offers to represent the film, with the trial judge warning her about this after defendant pro-bono, his only reasoning being "I don't like seeing the pair near each other, but he has no proof.
* How the movie ''Film/ErnestGoesToJail'' starts out. A henchman of bank robber Felix Nash realizes that one of the jurors at his murder trial, [[Film/ErnestPWorrell Ernest P. Worrell,]] looks exactly like his boss. He arranges for the jurors to visit the prison where the crime was committed, after which Nash knocks out Ernest and changes places. After that, Nash insists on finding his henchman innocent, keeping the henchman from getting his sentence upped to life, and then Nash walks out of the courthouse a free man, leaving Ernest in jail to serve out Nash's sentence (of death).
people railroaded."
* In the Margaret Rutherford ''Film/MissMarple'' film ''Murder Most Foul'', Miss Marple is the only juror who believes a suspect is innocent and causes a hung jury. She then goes to examine the case herself.
* A non-courtroom example in ''Film/TheInternship''. Lyle is taking a stand for the heroes by defending their awkward internship application against the other members of the council who wanted them out immediately.
* [[DownplayedTrope Downplayed]] in ''Film/RunawayJury'': the rogue juror's task was simply to make the other jurors follow their own predilections rather than actively changing their minds.
* In the early Creator/AlfredHitchcock whodunnit ''Film/{{Murder}}'', the jury at Diana Baring's murder trial initially includes seven "guilty" votes, three "not guilty", and two undecided. However, the two undecided jurors and two of the "not guilty" voters are almost immediately persuaded to vote for conviction, so that the rest of the deliberation embodies the "rogue juror" setup as the lone holdout, Sir John Menier, tries to explain why he doesn't think the evidence against Diana adds up. But up -- but as he is unable to do so convincingly, he is ultimately browbeaten into voting "guilty"."guilty".
* {{Downplayed|Trope}} in ''Film/RunawayJury'': the rogue juror's task is simply to make the other jurors follow their own predilections rather than actively change their minds.
* In ''Film/{{Suspect}}'', a juror not only holds onto the notion that the murder suspect is innocent, but he also passes information to the defense attorney, then meets with her in person and helps her with her case, actions that would likely get her disbarred in real life. {{Lampshade|Hanging}} and {{discussed|Trope}} in the film, with the trial judge warning her about this after seeing the pair near each other, but he has no proof.
* Actually inverted in the TV movie ''We the Jury'', as one juror is convinced that the defendant is guilty and convinces the other jurors as well.



* One of ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'''s short stories sees Harry Dresden (very grudgingly) sitting on the jury for a homicide trial. The other eleven jurors are convinced the defendant is guilty, but Harry quickly figures out that the "victim" was actually a vampire and the defendant killed him in defense of an innocent girl. Harry ends up rescuing the girl from another vampire who is holding her captive to prevent her from testifying in the defendant's defense, then refuses to give a guilty verdict, leading to a hung jury. Upon finding out that the girl the defendant saved was found, the prosecutor decides to drop the charges.
* This happens offscreen at the beginning of the Literature/LordPeterWimsey novel ''Strong Poison''; Lord Peter's associate Miss Climpson is the jury holdout in the murder trial of Harriet Vane. This leads to a hung jury and a retrial, allowing Peter -- [[LoveAtFirstSight who has fallen instantly in love with Harriet]] -- time to find the evidence to clear her.



* Pavel Young's court-martial in the ''Literature/HonorHarrington'' novel ''Field of Dishonor'' has White Haven (the senior admiral of the panel) accuse ''half of the members'' of acting like this for political reasons, at which point the lowest ranking officer there turns around and accuses him right back. Eventually, one of the dissenting admirals negotiates a political compromise and agrees to vote with White Haven (breaking the deadlock 4-2) to convict on the lesser charges, provided they remain hung on the capital ones, resulting in Young's dishonorable discharge and setting the stage for the second half of the book. The other two never change their votes. Though since it's a military tribunal, the simple majority is enough.

to:

* ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'': One short story sees Harry Dresden (very grudgingly) sitting on the jury for a homicide trial. The other eleven jurors are convinced the defendant is guilty, but Harry quickly figures out that the "victim" was actually a vampire and the defendant killed him in defense of an innocent girl. Harry ends up rescuing the girl from another vampire who is holding her captive to prevent her from testifying in the defendant's defense, then refuses to give a guilty verdict, leading to a hung jury. Upon finding out that the girl the defendant saved was found, the prosecutor decides to drop the charges.
* Pavel Young's court-martial [[CourtMartialed court-martial]] in the ''Literature/HonorHarrington'' novel ''Field of Dishonor'' has White Haven (the senior admiral of the panel) accuse ''half of the members'' of acting like this for political reasons, at which point the lowest ranking officer there turns around and accuses him right back. Eventually, one of the dissenting admirals negotiates a political compromise and agrees to vote with White Haven (breaking the deadlock 4-2) to convict on the lesser charges, provided they remain hung on the capital ones, resulting in Young's dishonorable discharge and setting the stage for the second half of the book. The other two never change their votes. Though votes, though since it's a military tribunal, the simple majority is enough.



* In ''Literature/ToKillAMockingbird'', Atticus Finch's beliefs and [[ShamingTheMob Scout's actions]] caused one of the jurors to greatly lengthen the process of the trial of a black man that Atticus was defending. The man was eventually found guilty because the rogue had no chance of convincing the other jurors of changing their minds (though Atticus believed if he'd gotten another of the rogue juror's group into it, the jury would have been deadlocked). It is reasonable to assume that the rogue [[JuryAndWitnessTampering may have gotten death threats.]]

to:

* This happens offscreen at the beginning of the ''Literature/LordPeterWimsey'' novel ''Strong Poison''; Lord Peter's associate Miss Climpson is the jury holdout in the murder trial of Harriet Vane. This leads to a hung jury and a retrial, allowing Peter -- [[LoveAtFirstSight who has fallen instantly in love with Harriet]] -- time to find the evidence to clear her.
* In ''Literature/ToKillAMockingbird'', Atticus Finch's beliefs and [[ShamingTheMob Scout's actions]] caused cause one of the jurors to greatly lengthen the process of the trial of a black man that who Atticus was is defending. The man was is eventually found guilty because the rogue had no chance of convincing the other jurors of changing their minds (though Atticus believed believes that if he'd gotten another of the rogue juror's group into it, the jury would have been deadlocked). It is reasonable to assume that the rogue [[JuryAndWitnessTampering may have gotten death threats.]]threats]].



* ''Series/LittleHouseOnThePrairie'': In "Barn Burner," a black man named Joe Kagan (Moses Gunn, in a recurring role) is the lone holdout on a jury that has voted to convict racist farmer Judd Larabee for burning down Jonathan Garvey's barn. Ironically, Larabee had objected to forming a cooperative specifically because Kagan -- the lone black farmer in the Walnut Grove area -- would also get to enjoy the co-op's benefits, and Larabee was fingered as the suspect after Garvey confronted Larabee at his home. Kagan's instincts prove right: Andy Garvey, who had been assaulted by Larabee on the night of the barn fire, had accidentally caused the fire after leaving a burning lantern hang on a hook just outside the barn door, and the wind swept the flames into the dry tinderwood. Larabee is acquitted of barn burning (a crime that was punishable by death) ... and he shows his "gratitude" by going on a tirade about blacks. By this point, everyone is tired of his rants, and he is left to die a lonely, bitter man.
* On ''Series/TheOddCouple1970'' Felix and Oscar tell the Pigeon sisters how they met during jury duty, with Felix in the rogue juror role. Though the defendant was innocent, he was, after the trial, driven to actually commit the violent assault he had been falsely accused of after being trapped in an elevator with Felix. Interestingly, Jack Klugman [[ActorAllusion had played a juror]] in the original ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'' movie (and Jack Lemmon, who played Felix in the 1967 film version, went on to play the rogue in the ''Film/TwelveAngryMen1997'' remake, an odd bit of synchronicity).

to:

* ''Series/LittleHouseOnThePrairie'': In "Barn Burner," a black man named Joe Kagan (Moses Gunn, in a recurring role) an episode of ''Series/TwoTwoSeven'', Sandra is the lone holdout on a jury holdout, with Mary being among the annoyed fellow jurors. However, after Sandra shares her doubts with Mary, the latter realizes that she has voted to convict racist farmer Judd Larabee for burning down Jonathan Garvey's barn. Ironically, Larabee had objected to forming a cooperative specifically because Kagan -- point. They eventually acquit the lone black farmer man, who turns out to be innocent.
* Parodied
in the Walnut Grove area -- would also get to enjoy ''Series/ThirdRockFromTheSun'' episode "11 Angry Men and a Dick", in which Dick meets the co-op's benefits, guy briefly in the courthouse lobby and Larabee was fingered as likes the suspect after Garvey confronted Larabee at his home. Kagan's instincts prove right: Andy Garvey, who had been assaulted by Larabee on guy before finding out he's the night of defendant in the barn fire, had accidentally caused the fire after leaving a burning lantern hang on a hook just outside the barn door, and the wind swept the flames into the dry tinderwood. Larabee is acquitted of barn burning (a crime case he's serving on. It's obvious that was punishable by death) ... and he shows his "gratitude" by going on a tirade about blacks. By this point, everyone is tired he's guilty, but Dick goes out of his rants, and way to invent [[InsaneTrollLogic completely incredible]] reasons he is left to die a lonely, bitter man.might be innocent.
-->''"Well, Foster ''said'' he didn't do it. Are you calling him -- ''and'' his attorney -- a liar?!"''
* On ''Series/TheOddCouple1970'' Felix and Oscar tell Inverted in an episode of ''Series/SeventhHeaven'' in which one of the Pigeon sisters how they met during main characters of the show persuades a reluctant jury duty, to accept the testimony of the police and find the defendant guilty.
* Edith does this in ''Series/AllInTheFamily'', even reusing an argument from the film: when one racist juror says "those people" are born liars, Edith asks why she believes a key prosecution witness who is the same race as the defendant, to big applause from the audience.
* Played fairly straight in ''Series/TheAndyGriffithShow'' when Aunt Bea is a holdout for a not guilty verdict but is completely inarticulate about why. She merely keeps insisting that she doesn't think the accused is guilty and winds up hanging the jury. As the court is preparing for another trial, Sheriff Taylor discovers that the real perpetrator was watching the trial from the gallery, and arrests him.
* One episode of ''Series/Batman1966'' has Batman (for some unexplained reason -- he might know a lot about the law, but he never took the bar exam, nor does he work for the D.A.'s office) acting as the prosecutor in a trial against Joker and Catwoman. The whole jury voted not guilty despite the evidence, at which point Robin realized that Joker's lawyer had managed to get the entire jury filled
with Felix ex-henchmen of the two criminals. Batman and Robin beat up the crooks, and the trial gets redone. This ignores the fact that both sides of a judicial case are supposed to be screening the jury to ensure that the jurors aren't prejudiced ''before'' the trial even begins, and a provable close association with the defendants is an automatic disqualification.
* Unusually done
in the rogue juror role. Though fourth season ''Series/BlueBloods'' episode "Justice Served" when Danny Regan, a detective, is the sole holdout for a "not guilty" verdict in a murder trial because he notes how flimsy some of the evidence is and how bad the eyewitness testimony was. When he is identified as the Commissioner's son and how he should follow his father's policy on tough justice by another juror, the trial is tossed, and the other investigating detectives are none too happy with this, so it becomes Danny's case to solve.
* {{Subverted|Trope}} in an episode of ''Series/{{Bones}}'' in which Brennan's the rogue: she convinces the rest of the jury the defendant is not guilty, but then discovers he not only murdered his wife, but his best friend as well (a witness in the case), and she must then prove him guilty of this new murder along with the rest of the team. Of note: when the forewoman asked who thought
the defendant was innocent, he was, after guilty, Brennan raised her hand. She then went on to point out that what they ''believed'' didn't matter, as the trial, driven verdict must rely on what they could prove. She held out for "not guilty" because she felt the prosecution hadn't reached the burden of proof necessary to actually convict, not because she necessarily thought the defendant was innocent.
* In one episode of ''Series/Castle2009'', a juror is poisoned before deliberations start, but it's revealed that he managed to get himself placed on the jury in the first place in order so that he could act as one of these. [[spoiler:Specifically, he knew that the defendant didn't
commit the violent crime because his brother was with the person who did at the time, but while he didn't want to throw his brother to the wolves, he couldn't in good conscience let an innocent man go to jail for it.]]
* An episode of ''Series/Charmed1998'' has Phoebe do this after her magical power (seeing visions of the past or future) reveals that the defendant is actually innocent of the murder in question. Unable to convince the other jurors by normal means, she [[spoiler:summons the victim's spirit to tell them the real culprit, and then gives the others LaserGuidedAmnesia after the trial]].
* Inverted in the B-plot of the two-part ''Series/{{Cheers}}'' episode "Never Love a Goalie", in which Diane serves on a jury in an
assault he had been falsely accused of after being trapped in an elevator with Felix. Interestingly, Jack Klugman [[ActorAllusion had played case filed by a juror]] in woman against her husband, and Diane is the original ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'' movie (and Jack Lemmon, who played Felix in only one convinced of the 1967 film version, went on defendant's guilt, to play the exasperation of the other jurors. Ultimately, the woman drops the charges and the deliberations are ended prematurely, but when the woman and her husband visit Cheers at the end of the episode, Diane manages to provoke the husband into threatening his wife, thereby demonstrating his guilt in front of witnesses.
* In ''Series/CrossingJordan'',
the rogue juror is Jordan (in quite possibly the most unrealistic trial of this type ever; just for starters, Jordan is already acquainted with the prosecutor). No one is surprised.
* ''Series/{{CSI}}'':
** One episode has the holdout on a jury found dead. The suspicion is that he was murdered to end the deadlock, when in truth [[spoiler:he was stung by a bee that had flown into the jury room through an open window and died from a massive allergic reaction]].
** The arc regarding Greg's AccidentalMurder of Demitrius James
in the ''Film/TwelveAngryMen1997'' remake, defense of a man he and a mob were beating up has Sanders trying to defend himself in court and, overall, what looked like an odd bit OpenAndShutCase (Greg saw the crowd, he tried to scare them off with his car, James tried to attack instead, he hit him with the car because he couldn't brake in time, it's all clear) turns into a circus of synchronicity). accusing Greg of alleged PoliceBrutality, racism and even the possibility of having been a DrunkDriver during the act (thus ending with the James family forming IrrationalHatred for cops in general and Greg in specific) because of a jackass juror that wishes "all of the facts being brought to light" and won't vote until he hears them (even interrupting testimonies to question the witnesses).



* ''Series/{{Monk}}'':
** In the episode "[[Recap/MonkS4E16MrMonkGetsJuryDuty Mr. Monk Gets Jury Duty]]". [[spoiler:And done deliberately by another juror -- she was only there to prolong the trial until she could help another defendant escape, so she looked over the shoulder of the juror next to her and voted the opposite way. As it happened, the person next to her was Monk, the only "not guilty" vote, so she ended up voting the same way as the other ten jurors.]]
** In [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/MonkS2E9MrMonkAndTheTwelfthMan Mr. Monk and the 12th Man]], Monk deduces that the victims of a series of seemingly unrelated murders had all served on the same jury. As it tuns out, the suspect was being blackmailed by one of them. However, he didn't know which member of the jury it was, so he [[SerialKillingsSpecificTarget opted to kill everyone in the jury.]]
* ''Series/{{CSI}}'':
** One episode of has the holdout on a jury found dead. The suspicion is that he was murdered to end the deadlock, when in truth [[spoiler:he was stung by a bee that had flown into the jury room through an open window and died from a massive allergic reaction]].
** The arc regarding Greg's AccidentalMurder of Demitrius James in the defense of a man he and a mob were beating up has Sanders trying to defend himself in court and, overall, what looked like an OpenAndShutCase (Greg saw the crowd, he tried to scare them off with his car, James tried to attack instead, he hit him with the car because he couldn't brake in time, it's all clear) turns into a circus of accusing Greg of alleged PoliceBrutality, racism and even the possibility of having been a DrunkDriver during the act (thus ending with the James family forming IrrationalHatred for cops in general and Greg in specific) because of a jackass juror that wishes "all of the facts being brought to light" and won't vote until he hears them (even interrupting testimonies to question the witnesses).
* [[InvertedTrope Inverted]] in the ''Series/VeronicaMars'' episode "[[Recap/VeronicaMarsS02E10OneAngryVeronica One Angry Veronica]]," where Veronica is forewoman of a jury and one member is the single holdout for a ''guilty'' verdict. Over the course of the episode, the jurors find additional information which does, in fact, point the finger at the defendants; eventually, there is only one holdout for not guilty, who only agrees to vote guilty because he's sure the defendants will get off on appeal.
* ''Series/{{MacGyver|1985}}'' used this trope in one episode. Mac goes so far as to break sequester and sneak out to the crime scene to gather evidence himself. Of course, in the real world, that would get you a sentence for contempt of court and the trial itself would be declared a mistrial, but real life never gets in the way of TV justice.
* In one episode of ''Series/QuincyME'', the titular character found himself on a jury in an apparently open and shut murder case and proceeded to annoy everyone by continually asking questions about the evidence (and deducing the real killer, of course). This also doubles as an ActorAllusion -- Jack Klugman (Quincy) starred as Juror #5 in the 1957 movie version of ''Film/TwelveAngryMen''.
* Parodied in ''Series/ThirdRockFromTheSun'' ("11 Angry Men and a Dick"), where Dick meets the guy briefly in the courthouse lobby and likes the guy before finding out he's the defendant in the case he's serving on. It's obvious he's guilty, but Dick goes out of his way to invent [[InsaneTrollLogic completely incredible]] reasons he might be innocent.
-->"Well, Foster SAID he didn't do it. Are you calling him -- AND his attorney -- a liar?!"
* Also inverted in an episode of ''Series/SeventhHeaven'', in which one of the main characters of the show persuades a reluctant jury to accept the testimony of the police and find the defendant guilty.
* Edith did it in ''Series/AllInTheFamily'', even reusing an argument from the film: when one racist juror says "those people" are born liars, Edith asks why she believes a key prosecution witness who is the same race as the defendant, to big applause from the audience.

to:

* ''Series/{{Monk}}'':
**
In ''Series/TheDickVanDykeShow'', Rob is the episode "[[Recap/MonkS4E16MrMonkGetsJuryDuty Mr. Monk Gets Jury Duty]]". [[spoiler:And done deliberately by another juror -- she was only there to prolong lone holdout in the trial until she could help another defendant escape, so she looked over the shoulder of the juror next to her and voted the opposite way. As it happened, the person next to her was Monk, the only "not guilty" vote, so she ended up voting the same way as the other ten jurors.]]
** In [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/MonkS2E9MrMonkAndTheTwelfthMan Mr. Monk and the 12th Man]], Monk deduces that the victims of a series of seemingly unrelated murders had all served on the same jury. As it tuns out, the suspect was being blackmailed by one of them. However, he didn't know which member of the jury it was, so he [[SerialKillingsSpecificTarget opted to kill everyone in the jury.]]
* ''Series/{{CSI}}'':
** One episode of has the holdout on a jury found dead. The suspicion is that he was murdered to end the deadlock,
an attractive woman. Naturally, Laura isn't happy when in truth [[spoiler:he was stung by a bee that had flown into the jury room through an open window and died from a massive allergic reaction]].
** The arc regarding Greg's AccidentalMurder of Demitrius James in the defense of a man he and a mob were beating up has Sanders trying to defend himself in court and, overall, what looked like an OpenAndShutCase (Greg saw the crowd, he tried to scare them off with his car, James tried to attack instead, he hit him with the car because he couldn't brake in time, it's all clear) turns into a circus of accusing Greg of alleged PoliceBrutality, racism and even the possibility of having been a DrunkDriver during the act (thus ending with the James family forming IrrationalHatred for cops in general and Greg in specific) because of a jackass juror that wishes "all of the facts being brought to light" and won't vote until he
she hears them (even interrupting testimonies to question the witnesses).
about this.
* [[InvertedTrope Inverted]] in the ''Series/VeronicaMars'' episode "[[Recap/VeronicaMarsS02E10OneAngryVeronica One ''Series/DoogieHowserMD'': "Eleven Angry Veronica]]," where Veronica is forewoman of a jury People... and one member is the single holdout for Vinnie" has a ''guilty'' verdict. Over the course of the episode, the jurors find additional information which does, in fact, point the finger at the defendants; eventually, there is only one holdout for not guilty, who only agrees to vote guilty because he's sure the defendants will get off take on appeal.
* ''Series/{{MacGyver|1985}}'' used this trope in one episode. Mac goes so far as to break sequester and sneak out to the crime scene to gather evidence himself. Of course, in the real world, that would get you a sentence for contempt of court and the trial itself would be declared a mistrial, but real life never gets in the way of TV justice.
* In one episode of ''Series/QuincyME'', the titular character found himself on a jury in an apparently open and shut murder case and proceeded to annoy everyone by continually asking questions about the evidence (and deducing the real killer, of course). This also doubles as an ActorAllusion -- Jack Klugman (Quincy) starred as Juror #5 in the 1957 movie version of ''Film/TwelveAngryMen''.
* Parodied in ''Series/ThirdRockFromTheSun'' ("11
''12 Angry Men and a Dick"), where Dick meets the guy briefly in the courthouse lobby and likes the guy before finding out he's Men'' wherein the defendant in the case he's serving on. It's obvious he's guilty, but Dick goes out is a young man accused of assaulting his employer. Vinnie's not convinced of his way guilt.
* In ''Series/EarlyEdition'', Gary tries
to invent [[InsaneTrollLogic completely incredible]] reasons he might be innocent.
-->"Well, Foster SAID he didn't do it. Are you calling him -- AND his attorney --
avoid getting on a liar?!"
* Also inverted in an episode of ''Series/SeventhHeaven'', in which one of the main characters of the show persuades a reluctant
jury because of his ability to accept get tomorrow's newspaper; however, he ends up on the testimony of jury anyway. He finds out that the police and find the defendant guilty.
* Edith did it in ''Series/AllInTheFamily'', even reusing an argument from the film: when one racist juror says "those people" are born liars, Edith asks why she
man everyone believes a key prosecution witness who is guilty [[FrameUp has been framed]] (and hangs himself after the same race as the defendant, guilty verdict) and tries to big applause from the audience.prove his innocence, to everyone else's annoyance.



* Leslie Knope on ''Series/ParksAndRecreation'' goes rogue as a member of a beauty contest judging panel. She wants to give the award to a talented girl who does a lot of charity work, while everyone else wants to give it to a super-hot giggling moron. (Never mind that, um, it's a ''beauty'' contest.)
* On ''Series/HappyDays'', Fonzie uses his knowledge of motorcycles to prove the defendant's innocence to Howard and the other jurors. This episode has racism as a central point of the plot. At the end, the grateful defendant who was found not guilty (a black man) hugs the racist juror when he thanks him for serving on the jury.

to:

* Leslie Knope on ''Series/ParksAndRecreation'' goes rogue as a member ''Series/ForThePeople'': When Judge Byrne is called for jury duty and gets selected (the defense lawyer didn't even pay attention to his responses) he's delighted at the idea of seeing the criminal justice system from another angle. He soon becomes the lone holdout when the rest of the jury votes "guilty" though. After his attempt to explain why the prosecution didn't prove the accused guilty beyond a beauty contest judging panel. reasonable doubt, he gets them to understand even so. They come around to his view and acquit. Unlike in most examples, he admits that most likely the defendant is guilty, but since the prosecution didn't prove it, he should go free.
* ''Series/TheGoodWife'':
** In one episode, a trial is hung due to one CrazyCatLady juror deciding that the defendant is innocent and refusing to vote otherwise.
** In the episode "Blue Ribbon Panel", protagonist Alicia Florrick becomes this when she suspects that police are covering up what really happened in a shooting.
She wants to give wins over other members of the award panel... only for the chain of evidence to a talented girl who does a lot lead back to her husband, the State's Attorney, forcing her to recuse herself.
* In an episode
of charity work, ''Radio/HancocksHalfHour'' titled "12 Angry Men", both Tony Hancock and Sid James are on the jury. Sid tries to stall things because he finds out that they're getting paid by the day, while everyone else wants Tony simply thinks the accused has a nice face and doesn't want to give it to a super-hot giggling moron. (Never mind that, um, it's a ''beauty'' contest.)
believe that he's guilty.
* On In ''Series/HappyDays'', Fonzie uses his knowledge of motorcycles to prove the defendant's innocence to Howard and the other jurors. This The episode in question has racism as a central point of the plot. At the end, the grateful defendant who was found not guilty (a black man) hugs the racist juror when he thanks him for serving on the jury. jury.
* A 2015 episode of ''Series/InsideAmySchumer'' parodies ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'' virtually shot for shot, with the jurors deliberating over whether Schumer is "hot enough to be on television". [[spoiler:In TheStinger, Amy reminds the judge that she was actually on trial for vehicular manslaughter.]]
* An episode of ''Series/{{JAG}}'' had Bud fill this role in an episode. With the twist that after it was over, Harm (who'd been the defense attorney for the case) told him that he thought the defendant really was guilty.
* ''Series/LasVegas'': Ed Deline, a casino security expert, plays this role in "Tainted Love". He's called for jury duty, but before the deliberation by the jury even begins, he already openly notes many discrepancies in the prosecution's case (for which he is almost held in contempt of court), and even investigates the case himself during his off-time (note that doing this is illegal, even by so much as looking up the legal definitions of the charges). He discovers that the suspect is innocent, but the judge orders him not to use any of the new evidence that he obtained in his judgment, so instead, he proves to the other jurors that the guy is innocent by noting that he is left-handed, while the real perpetrator would have to be right-handed to commit the crime the way the photos show. He tells his wife the reason why he went out of his way to help the kid; when Ed was a teenager, he was caught stealing hubcaps. Even though he actually committed the crime, a single juror simply refused to find him guilty because he wanted to give Ed a second chance.
* Though it's never actually shown onscreen, several episodes of the various ''Franchise/LawAndOrder'' incarnations mention this as having happened with the jury in the case of the week. In at least one case, it turns out that this was because the juror had been bribed.
* ''Series/LittleHouseOnThePrairie'': In "[[Recap/LittleHouseOnThePrairieS5E17BarnBurner Barn Burner]]", a black man named Joe Kagan is the lone holdout on a jury that has voted to convict racist farmer Judd Larabee for burning down Jonathan Garvey's barn. Ironically, Larabee had objected to forming a cooperative specifically because Kagan -- the lone black farmer in the Walnut Grove area -- would also get to enjoy the co-op's benefits, and Larabee was fingered as the suspect after Garvey confronted Larabee at his home. Kagan's instincts prove right: Andy Garvey, who had been assaulted by Larabee on the night of the barn fire, had accidentally caused the fire after leaving a burning lantern hang on a hook just outside the barn door, and the wind swept the flames into the dry tinderwood. Larabee is acquitted of barn burning (a crime that was punishable by death)... and he shows his "gratitude" by going on a tirade about blacks. By this point, everyone is tired of his rants, and he is left to die a lonely, bitter man.
* ''Series/MacGyver1985'': In one episode, Mac goes so far as to break sequester and sneak out to the crime scene to gather evidence himself. Of course, in the real world, that would get you a sentence for contempt of court and the trial itself would be declared a mistrial, but real life never gets in the way of TV justice.



* An episode of ''Series/{{Charmed|1998}}'' has Phoebe do this after her magical power (seeing visions of the past or future) reveals that the defendant is actually innocent of the murder in question. Unable to convince the other jurors by normal means, she [[spoiler: summons the victim's spirit to tell them the real culprit, and then gives the others LaserGuidedAmnesia after the trial]].
* Played fairly straight in ''Series/TheAndyGriffithShow'' when Aunt Bea is a holdout for a not guilty verdict but is completely inarticulate about why. She merely keeps insisting that she doesn't think the accused is guilty and winds up hanging the jury. As the court is preparing for another trial, Sheriff Taylor discovers that the real perpetrator was watching the trial from the gallery, and arrests him.
* ''Series/TheSingleGuy'' used actual clips from the movie at one point.
* Subverted in ''Series/PeepShow'', in which Jez starts dating the defendant and convinces the fellow jury members that she is innocent, but after discovering that she actually gets into fights for fun, he decides he doesn't want to go out with her anymore and convinces them back to the guilty verdict... Double subverted in fact in that the defendant really is innocent of that specific crime, but has committed several more along the same lines and got away with it.
--> '''Jez:''' Justice has been served... well, not actual justice. But what I wanted to happen. Which is pretty much the same thing.
** Also lampshaded:
---> '''Jez:''' I'm in ''Twelve Angry Men''! I'm the only one who's not angry. I'm horny.
* Done on ''Series/TheGoodWife'' where a trial was hung due to one crazy cat lady juror deciding the defendant was innocent and refusing to vote otherwise.
** In the episode 'Blue Ribbon Panel', protagonist Alicia Florrick becomes this when she suspects that police are covering up what really happened in a shooting. She wins over other members of the panel... only for the chain of evidence to lead back to her husband, the State's Attorney, forcing her to recuse herself.
* In ''Series/EarlyEdition'', Gary tries to avoid getting on a jury because of his ability to get tomorrow's newspaper; however, he ends up on the jury anyway. He finds out that the man everyone believes is guilty [[FrameUp has been framed]] (and hangs himself after the guilty verdict) and tries to prove his innocence, to everyone else's annoyance.
* Subverted in one episode of ''Series/MurderSheWrote'', Jessica is forewoman in a murder trial and is the sole juror to think a certain way, but rather than all of them being certain but her being certain the opposite way, nine of the other jurors want to find the man innocent and two think he's guilty. But she's undecided, and rather than declare a mistrial asks them to take some time to review the facts. In an additional subversion [[spoiler:the jury acquits, because while the defendant did commit murder (disguised as an accident), he is not guilty of ''the murder he's on trial for,'' and convicting would've allowed the real killer to go free]].

to:

* An PlayedForLaughs in an episode of ''Series/{{Charmed|1998}}'' has Phoebe do this after her magical power (seeing visions ''Series/{{Minder}}'' when Arthur Daley finds himself serving on a jury, on a fairly minor criminal matter. He is initially the sole holdout, but eventually turns the rest of the past or future) reveals that jury to his point of view. Eventually, the defendant is actually innocent of the murder in question. Unable to convince the other jurors by normal means, she [[spoiler: summons the victim's spirit to tell them the real culprit, and then gives the others LaserGuidedAmnesia after the trial]].
* Played fairly straight in ''Series/TheAndyGriffithShow'' when Aunt Bea is a
only holdout for a not guilty verdict but is completely inarticulate about why. She merely keeps insisting a little old lady. However, she then drops a single piece of information that she doesn't think swings everyone back to guilty, and Arthur has no choice but to follow.
* ''Series/{{Monk}}'':
** In "[[Recap/MonkS2E9MrMonkAndTheTwelfthMan Mr. Monk and
the accused is guilty and winds up hanging 12th Man]]", Monk deduces that the victims of a series of seemingly unrelated murders had all served on the same jury. As it tuns out, the court suspect was being blackmailed by one of them. However, he didn't know which member of the jury it was, so he [[SerialKillingsSpecificTarget opted to kill everyone in the jury]].
** In "[[Recap/MonkS4E16MrMonkGetsJuryDuty Mr. Monk Gets Jury Duty]]", [[spoiler:this
is preparing for done deliberately by another trial, Sheriff Taylor discovers that the real perpetrator was watching juror -- she's only there to prolong the trial from the gallery, and arrests him.
* ''Series/TheSingleGuy'' used actual clips from the movie at one point.
* Subverted in ''Series/PeepShow'', in which Jez starts dating the
until she can help another defendant escape, so she looks over the shoulder of the juror next to her and convinces votes the fellow jury members that opposite way. As it happens, the person next to her is Monk, the only "not guilty" vote, so she is innocent, but after discovering that she actually gets into fights for fun, he decides he doesn't want to go out with her anymore and convinces them back to the guilty verdict... Double subverted in fact in that the defendant really is innocent of that specific crime, but has committed several more along ends up voting the same lines and got away with it.
--> '''Jez:''' Justice has been served... well, not actual justice. But what I wanted to happen. Which is pretty much
way as the same thing.
** Also lampshaded:
---> '''Jez:''' I'm in ''Twelve Angry Men''! I'm the only one who's not angry. I'm horny.
* Done on ''Series/TheGoodWife'' where a trial was hung due to one crazy cat lady juror deciding the defendant was innocent and refusing to vote otherwise.
** In the episode 'Blue Ribbon Panel', protagonist Alicia Florrick becomes this when she suspects that police are covering up what really happened in a shooting. She wins over
other members of the panel... only for the chain of evidence to lead back to her husband, the State's Attorney, forcing her to recuse herself.
* In ''Series/EarlyEdition'', Gary tries to avoid getting on a jury because of his ability to get tomorrow's newspaper; however, he ends up on the jury anyway. He finds out that the man everyone believes is guilty [[FrameUp has been framed]] (and hangs himself after the guilty verdict) and tries to prove his innocence, to everyone else's annoyance.
ten jurors]].
* Subverted in one episode of ''Series/MurderSheWrote'', ''Series/MurderSheWrote''. Jessica is forewoman in a murder trial and is the sole juror to think a certain way, but rather than all of them being certain but her being certain the opposite way, nine of the other jurors want to find the man innocent and two think he's guilty. But However, she's undecided, and rather than declare a mistrial mistrial, she asks them to take some time to review the facts. In an additional subversion subversion, [[spoiler:the jury acquits, acquits because while the defendant did commit murder (disguised ([[MakeItLookLikeAnAccident disguised as an accident), accident]]), he is not guilty of ''the murder he's on trial for,'' for'', and convicting would've allowed the real killer to go free]].free]].
* ''Series/TheNanny'': In the episode "[[Recap/TheNannyS4E17SamsonHeDeniedHer Samson, He Denied Her]]", Fran and C.C. are called for jury duty, and Maxwell hopes it'll take Fran's mind off the fact that he had recently told her he loved her and then took it back. In the trial, the defendant is a housekeeper who is accused of assaulting her boss with a pair of scissors to chop off all his hair, but the trial also reveals that she did it because her boss told her she loved her and then took it back. This prompts Fran to immediately sympathize with the defendant and insist she's not guilty, even after the defendant blurted out a confession on the witness stand. Fran proceeds to drive the other jurors crazy because she refuses to vote guilty.



* ''Series/DoogieHowserMD'' had "Eleven Angry People...and Vinnie", where in a take on ''12 Angry Men,'' the defendant is a young man accused of assaulting his employer. Vinnie's not convinced of his guilt.
* On ''Series/TheDickVanDykeShow'', Rob is the lone holdout in the trial of an attractive woman. Naturally, Laura isn't happy when she hears about this.
* On ''Series/CrossingJordan'', the rogue juror is Jordan (in quite possibly the most unrealistic trial of this type ever; just for starters, Jordan is already acquainted with the prosecutor). No one is surprised.
* In the TV movie ''We The Jury'', it is actually an inversion, as one juror is convinced that the defendant is guilty and convinces the other jurors as well.
* An episode of ''Series/HancocksHalfHour'', called "12 Angry Men", in which both Tony Hancock and Sid James were on the jury. Sid tries to stall things because he finds out they're getting paid by the day, while Tony simply thinks the accused has a nice face and doesn't want to believe he was guilty.
** And a remake starring Paul Merton.
* On the episode "Samson, He Denied Her" of ''Series/TheNanny'', Fran and C.C. are called for jury duty, and Maxwell hopes it'll take Fran's mind off the fact that he had recently told her he loved her and then took it back. In the trial, the defendant is a housekeeper who is accused of assaulting her boss with a pair of scissors to chop off all his hair, but the trial also reveals that she did it because her boss told her she loved her and then took it back. This prompts Fran to immediately sympathize with the defendant and insist she's not guilty, even after the defendant blurted out a confession on the witness stand. Fran proceeds to drive the other jurors crazy because she refuses to vote guilty.
* One episode of the live-action ''Series/Batman1966'' show had Batman (for some unexplained reason -- he might know a lot about the law, but he never took the bar exam, nor does he work for the D.A.'s office) acting as the prosecutor in a trial against Joker and Catwoman. The whole jury voted not guilty despite the evidence, at which point Robin realized that Joker's lawyer had managed to get the entire jury filled with ex-henchmen of the two criminals. Batman and Robin beat up the crooks, and the trial gets redone. This ignores the fact that both sides of a judicial case are supposed to be screening the jury to ensure that the jurors aren't prejudiced ''before'' the trial even begins, and a provable close association with the defendants is an automatic disqualification.
* Inverted in the B-plot of the two-part ''Series/{{Cheers}}'' episode "Never Love a Goalie", in which Diane serves on a jury in an assault case filed by a woman against her husband, and Diane is the only one convinced of the defendant's guilt, to the exasperation of the other jurors. Ultimately, the woman drops the charges and the deliberations are ended prematurely, but when the woman and her husband visit Cheers at the end of the episode, Diane manages to provoke the husband into threatening his wife, thereby demonstrating his guilt in front of witnesses.
* Subverted in an episode of the Marlo Thomas-starring sitcom ''Series/ThatGirl'' (entitled "[[Film/TwelveAngryMen Eleven Angry Men]] and That Girl", although not all of the other jurors are male), in which Thomas' character, Ann Marie, is the lone member of a jury convinced that a man accused of striking his wife with an ashtray is innocent. When a male juror makes a pass at her and she slaps him, she realizes that the wife's injuries are on the wrong side of her face for a strike by her right-handed husband. The subversion comes when the husband is acquitted and begins arguing with his wife anew... and grabs a nearby ashtray and hits her across the face ''backhanded'', thereby explaining the anomaly that had persuaded Ann, and the other jurors, to acquit him.
* In ''Series/ShamelessUK'', Frank Gallagher becomes one when he discovers he can claim extra benefits as long as he is on jury service. From that point onward, he tries to drag the deliberation out for as long as possible, continually reversing his opinion whenever he cleverly convinces everyone to see things his way.
* Played by ''Series/{{Castle|2009}}'' in a case where a juror is poisoned; he's killed before deliberations start, but it's revealed that he managed to get himself placed on the jury in the first place in order so that he could act as one of these. [[spoiler:Specifically, he knows that the defendant didn't commit the crime because his brother was with the person who did at the time, but while he doesn't want to throw his brother to the wolves he can't in good conscience let an innocent man go to jail for it.]]
* On ''Series/RepublicOfDoyle'', Jake serves on a jury in the trial of a woman accused of killing her husband. He is the only one who believes her to be innocent and resorts to his regular antics to stall the deliberations and conduct his own investigation. The judge lets him get away with a lot because the courthouse is being renovated and there is a massive backlog of cases, so he does not want to declare a mistrial and have another trial. However, [[spoiler:he finally throws Jake off the jury when presented with definite evidence of misconduct: Jake stole the judge's cell phone to make a call while sequestered]]. In the end, [[spoiler:it turns out it was actually a suicide and the jury foreman was also a rogue juror who was trying to get a publishing deal]].
* ''Series/LasVegas'': Ed Deline, a casino security expert, plays this role in "Tainted Love". He's called for jury duty, but before the deliberation by the jury even begins, he already openly notes many discrepancies in the prosecution's case (for which he is almost held in contempt of court), and even investigates the case himself during his off-time (note that doing this -- even by so much as looking up the legal definitions of the charges -- is illegal). He discovers that the suspect is innocent, but the judge orders him not to use any of the new evidence that he obtained in his judgment. So instead he proves to the other jurors that the guy is innocent by noting that he is left-handed, while the real perpetrator would have to be right-handed to commit the crime the way the photos show. He tells his wife the reason why he went out of his way to help the kid; when Ed was a teenager, he was caught stealing hubcaps. Even though he actually committed the crime, a single juror simply refused to find him guilty because he wanted to give Ed a second chance.
* Though it's never actually shown onscreen, several episodes of the various ''Franchise/LawAndOrder'' incarnations mention this as having happened with the jury in the case of the week. In at least one case, it turned out that this was because the juror had been bribed.
* In ''[=McBride=]: The Chameleon Murder'', the pilot for a series of murder mystery movies broadcast on The Hallmark Channel, the titular [=McBride=], an ex-cop turned defense attorney, is the sole dissenting voice for acquittal for a woman charged for murder. After a mistrial, when the DA pledges to retry the case, [=McBride=] offers to represent the defendant pro-bono, his only reasoning, "I don't like seeing people railroaded."
* {{Subverted}} in an episode of ''{{Series/Bones}}'' where Brennan's the rogue: she convinces the rest of the jury the defendant is not guilty, but then discovers he not only murdered his wife, but his best friend as well (a witness in the case), and she must then prove him guilty of this new murder along with the rest of the team. Of note: when the forewoman asked who thought the defendant was guilty, Brennan raised her hand. She then went on to point out that what they ''believed'' didn't matter, as the verdict must rely on what they could prove. She held out for "not guilty" because she felt the prosecution hadn't reached the burden of proof necessary to convict, not because she necessarily thought the defendant was innocent.
* Unusually done with ''Series/BlueBloods'' in the fourth season episode "Justice Done" when Danny Regan, a detective, is the sole holdout for a "not guilty" verdict in a murder trial because he notes how flimsy some of the evidence is and how bad the eyewitness testimony was. When he is identified as the Commissioner's son and how he should follow his father's policy on tough justice by another juror, the trial is tossed and the other investigating detectives are none too happy with this. So it becomes Danny's case to solve.
* Played for laughs in an episode of ''Series/{{Minder}}'' where Arthur Daley finds himself serving on a jury, on a fairly minor criminal matter. He is initially the sole holdout, but eventually turns the rest of the jury to his point of view. Eventually, the only holdout for guilty is a little old lady. However, she then drops a single piece of information that swings everyone back to guilty and Arthur has no choice but to follow.
* A 2015 episode of ''Inside Amy Schumer'' parodies ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'' virtually shot for shot, with the jurors deliberating over whether Schumer is "hot enough to be on television". [[spoiler:In TheStinger, Amy reminds the judge she was actually on trial for vehicular manslaughter.]]
* ''Series/PersonOfInterest''. In "Guilty", the latest number is a juror, so Team Machine assume this trope is in play. The Machine arranges for Harold Finch to be on the jury, and [[TheFixer Zoe Morgan]] spends a lot of time rehearsing him on how to sway a jury towards guilty, only to have an OhCrap moment when the juror immediately agrees with this verdict. So then Harold has to become the rogue juror, stalling for time until Team Machine can find out what's really going on.
* Implied on ''Series/TheSopranos'' when Uncle Junior is on trial. [[JuryAndWitnessTampering Some of June's associates find one of the jurors]] (buying candy for his son, no less) and gently inform him that [[TheVillainKnowsWhereYouLive they know where he lives]]. In the next episode, the jury is hung with a single holdout, leading to a mistrial -- and that poor juror is hated by all the others.
* On ''Series/PerfectStrangers'', Balki is of course this, much to the frustration of the other jurors, including Larry. While his reasons for believing the man innocent seem foolish, his refusal to back down forces the others to review the evidence in order to convince him. With this, they eventually realize that he's right.
* An episode of ''Series/TwoTwoSeven'' had an identical plot, only Sandra was the holdout with Mary being among the annoyed fellow jurors. However, Sandra's doubts were much more logical, and after sharing them with Mary, the latter realized that she had a point. They eventually acquitted the man, who turned out to be innocent.
* Claire Greene was this in an episode of ''Series/PromisedLand1996'', wanting to acquit a young woman charged with criminally negligent homicide (her son had wandered out into the street while she was asleep and been hit by a car). With every argument she made, she managed to convince other jurors of the woman's innocence. Unusually for this trope, she turned out to be ''wrong''--only after the trial did she learn that the woman had been arrested for child endangerment ''three'' times prior to this incident and that contrary to the image she'd presented in court, she'd returned to the irresponsible behavior that led to her son's death and was now jeopardizing her daughter.
* ''Series/ForThePeople'': When Judge Byrne is called for jury duty and gets selected (the defense lawyer didn't even pay attention to his responses) he's delighted at the idea of seeing the criminal justice system from another angle. He soon becomes the lone holdout when the rest of the jury votes "guilty" though. After his attempt to explain why the prosecution didn't prove the accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, he gets them to understand even so. They come around to his view and acquit. Unlike in most examples, he admits that most likely the defendant is guilty, but since the prosecution didn't prove it, he should go free.
* An episode of ''Series/{{JAG}}'' had Bud fill this role in an episode. With the twist that after it was over, Harm (who'd been the defense attorney for the case) told him that he thought the defendant really was guilty.

to:

* ''Series/DoogieHowserMD'' had "Eleven Angry People...In ''Series/TheOddCouple1970'', Felix and Vinnie", where in a take on ''12 Angry Men,'' Oscar tell the defendant is a young man accused of assaulting his employer. Vinnie's not convinced of his guilt.
* On ''Series/TheDickVanDykeShow'', Rob is the lone holdout
Pigeon sisters how they met during jury duty, with Felix in the trial of an attractive woman. Naturally, Laura isn't happy when she hears about this.
* On ''Series/CrossingJordan'',
the rogue juror is Jordan (in quite possibly the most unrealistic trial of this type ever; just for starters, Jordan is already acquainted with the prosecutor). No one is surprised.
* In the TV movie ''We The Jury'', it is actually an inversion, as one juror is convinced that
role. Though the defendant is guilty was innocent, he was, after the trial, driven to actually commit the violent assault he had been falsely accused of after being trapped in an elevator with Felix. Interestingly, Jack Klugman [[ActorAllusion had played a juror]] in the original ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'' movie (and Jack Lemmon, who played Felix in the 1957 film version, went on to play the rogue in [[Film/TwelveAngryMen1997 the 1997 remake]], an odd bit of synchronicity).
* Leslie Knope from ''Series/ParksAndRecreation'' goes rogue as a member of a beauty contest judging panel. She wants to give the award to a talented girl who does a lot of charity work, while everyone else wants to give it to a super-hot giggling moron. (Never mind that, um, it's a ''beauty'' contest.)
* Subverted in ''Series/PeepShow'', in which Jez starts dating the defendant
and convinces the other jurors as well.
* An episode of ''Series/HancocksHalfHour'', called "12 Angry Men", in which both Tony Hancock and Sid James were on the jury. Sid tries to stall things because he finds out they're getting paid by the day, while Tony simply thinks the accused has a nice face and doesn't want to believe he was guilty.
** And a remake starring Paul Merton.
* On the episode "Samson, He Denied Her" of ''Series/TheNanny'', Fran and C.C. are called for
fellow jury duty, and Maxwell hopes it'll take Fran's mind off the fact that he had recently told her he loved her and then took it back. In the trial, the defendant is a housekeeper who is accused of assaulting her boss with a pair of scissors to chop off all his hair, but the trial also reveals members that she did it because her boss told her she loved her and then took it back. This prompts Fran to immediately sympathize with the defendant and insist she's not guilty, even is innocent, but after the defendant blurted out a confession on the witness stand. Fran proceeds to drive the other jurors crazy because she refuses to vote guilty.
* One episode of the live-action ''Series/Batman1966'' show had Batman (for some unexplained reason -- he might know a lot about the law, but he never took the bar exam, nor does he work for the D.A.'s office) acting as the prosecutor in a trial against Joker and Catwoman. The whole jury voted not guilty despite the evidence, at which point Robin realized
discovering that Joker's lawyer had managed to get the entire jury filled with ex-henchmen of the two criminals. Batman and Robin beat up the crooks, and the trial she actually gets redone. This ignores the fact that both sides of a judicial case are supposed to be screening the jury to ensure that the jurors aren't prejudiced ''before'' the trial even begins, and a provable close association with the defendants is an automatic disqualification.
* Inverted in the B-plot of the two-part ''Series/{{Cheers}}'' episode "Never Love a Goalie", in which Diane serves on a jury in an assault case filed by a woman against her husband, and Diane is the only one convinced of the defendant's guilt, to the exasperation of the other jurors. Ultimately, the woman drops the charges and the deliberations are ended prematurely, but when the woman and her husband visit Cheers at the end of the episode, Diane manages to provoke the husband
into threatening his wife, thereby demonstrating his guilt in front of witnesses.
* Subverted in an episode of the Marlo Thomas-starring sitcom ''Series/ThatGirl'' (entitled "[[Film/TwelveAngryMen Eleven Angry Men]] and That Girl", although not all of the other jurors are male), in which Thomas' character, Ann Marie, is the lone member of a jury convinced that a man accused of striking his wife with an ashtray is innocent. When a male juror makes a pass at her and she slaps him, she realizes that the wife's injuries are on the wrong side of her face
fights for a strike by her right-handed husband. The subversion comes when the husband is acquitted and begins arguing with his wife anew... and grabs a nearby ashtray and hits her across the face ''backhanded'', thereby explaining the anomaly that had persuaded Ann, and the other jurors, to acquit him.
* In ''Series/ShamelessUK'', Frank Gallagher becomes one when
fun, he discovers he can claim extra benefits as long as he is on jury service. From that point onward, he tries to drag the deliberation out for as long as possible, continually reversing his opinion whenever he cleverly convinces everyone to see things his way.
* Played by ''Series/{{Castle|2009}}'' in a case where a juror is poisoned; he's killed before deliberations start, but it's revealed that he managed to get himself placed on the jury in the first place in order so that he could act as one of these. [[spoiler:Specifically, he knows that the defendant didn't commit the crime because his brother was with the person who did at the time, but while
decides he doesn't want to throw his brother go out with her anymore and convinces them back to the wolves he can't guilty verdict... Double subverted in good conscience let an fact in that the defendant really is innocent of that specific crime, but has committed several more along the same lines and got away with it.
-->'''Jez:''' I'm in ''Twelve Angry Men''! I'm the only one who's not angry. I'm horny. ''[at the end]'' Justice has been served... Well, not actual justice. But what I wanted to happen. Which is pretty much the same thing.
* In ''Series/PerfectStrangers'', Balki is of course this, much to the frustration of the other jurors, including Larry. While his reasons for believing the
man go innocent seem foolish, his refusal to jail back down forces the others to review the evidence in order to convince him. With this, they eventually realize that he's right.
* ''Series/PersonOfInterest'': In "[[Recap/PersonOfInterestS04E14 Guilty]]", the latest number is a juror, so Team Machine assume this trope is in play. The Machine arranges
for it.]]
Harold Finch to be on the jury, and [[TheFixer Zoe Morgan]] spends a lot of time rehearsing him on how to sway a jury towards guilty, only to have an OhCrap moment when the juror immediately agrees with this verdict. Harold then has to become the rogue juror, stalling for time until Team Machine can find out what's really going on.
* On Claire Greene is this in an episode of ''Series/PromisedLand1996'', wanting to acquit a young woman charged with criminally negligent homicide (her son had wandered out into the street while she was asleep and been hit by a car). With every argument she makes, she manages to convince other jurors of the woman's innocence. Unusually for this trope, she turns out to be ''wrong'' -- only after the trial does she learn that the woman had been arrested for child endangerment ''three'' times prior to this incident and that contrary to the image she'd presented in court, she's returned to the irresponsible behavior that led to her son's death and is now jeopardizing her daughter.
* In one episode of ''Series/QuincyME'', the titular character found himself on a jury in an apparently open and shut murder case and proceeded to annoy everyone by continually asking questions about the evidence (and deducing the real killer, of course). This also doubles as an ActorAllusion -- Jack Klugman (Quincy) starred as Juror #5 in the 1957 movie version of ''Film/TwelveAngryMen''.
* In
''Series/RepublicOfDoyle'', Jake serves on a jury in the trial of a woman accused of killing her husband. He is the only one who believes her to be innocent and resorts to his regular antics to stall the deliberations and conduct his own investigation. The judge lets him get away with a lot because the courthouse is being renovated and there is a massive backlog of cases, so he does not want to declare a mistrial and have another trial. However, [[spoiler:he finally throws Jake off the jury when presented with definite evidence of misconduct: Jake stole the judge's cell phone to make a call while sequestered]]. In the end, [[spoiler:it turns out that it was actually a suicide suicide, and the jury foreman was is also a rogue juror who was who's trying to get a publishing deal]].
* ''Series/LasVegas'': Ed Deline, a casino security expert, plays this role in "Tainted Love". He's called for In ''Series/ShamelessUK'', Frank Gallagher becomes one when he discovers that he can claim extra benefits as long as he is on jury duty, but before service. From that point onward, he tries to drag the deliberation by the jury even begins, he already openly notes many discrepancies in the prosecution's case (for which he is almost held in contempt of court), and even investigates the case himself during out for as long as possible, continually reversing his off-time (note that doing this -- even by so much as looking up the legal definitions of the charges -- is illegal). He discovers that the suspect is innocent, but the judge orders him not to use any of the new evidence that opinion whenever he obtained in his judgment. So instead he proves to the other jurors that the guy is innocent by noting that he is left-handed, while the real perpetrator would have to be right-handed to commit the crime the way the photos show. He tells his wife the reason why he went out of his way to help the kid; when Ed was a teenager, he was caught stealing hubcaps. Even though he actually committed the crime, a single juror simply refused to find him guilty because he wanted to give Ed a second chance.
* Though it's never actually shown onscreen, several episodes of the various ''Franchise/LawAndOrder'' incarnations mention this as having happened with the jury in the case of the week. In at least one case, it turned out that this was because the juror had been bribed.
* In ''[=McBride=]: The Chameleon Murder'', the pilot for a series of murder mystery movies broadcast on The Hallmark Channel, the titular [=McBride=], an ex-cop turned defense attorney, is the sole dissenting voice for acquittal for a woman charged for murder. After a mistrial, when the DA pledges to retry the case, [=McBride=] offers to represent the defendant pro-bono, his only reasoning, "I don't like seeing people railroaded."
* {{Subverted}} in an episode of ''{{Series/Bones}}'' where Brennan's the rogue: she
cleverly convinces the rest of the jury the defendant is not guilty, but then discovers he not only murdered his wife, but his best friend as well (a witness in the case), and she must then prove him guilty of this new murder along with the rest of the team. Of note: when the forewoman asked who thought the defendant was guilty, Brennan raised her hand. She then went on to point out that what they ''believed'' didn't matter, as the verdict must rely on what they could prove. She held out for "not guilty" because she felt the prosecution hadn't reached the burden of proof necessary to convict, not because she necessarily thought the defendant was innocent.
* Unusually done with ''Series/BlueBloods'' in the fourth season episode "Justice Done" when Danny Regan, a detective, is the sole holdout for a "not guilty" verdict in a murder trial because he notes how flimsy some of the evidence is and how bad the eyewitness testimony was. When he is identified as the Commissioner's son and how he should follow his father's policy on tough justice by another juror, the trial is tossed and the other investigating detectives are none too happy with this. So it becomes Danny's case to solve.
* Played for laughs in an episode of ''Series/{{Minder}}'' where Arthur Daley finds himself serving on a jury, on a fairly minor criminal matter. He is initially the sole holdout, but eventually turns the rest of the jury to his point of view. Eventually, the only holdout for guilty is a little old lady. However, she then drops a single piece of information that swings
everyone back to guilty and Arthur has no choice but to follow.
see things his way.
* A 2015 episode of ''Inside Amy Schumer'' parodies ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'' virtually shot for shot, with ''Series/TheSingleGuy'' uses actual clips from the jurors deliberating over whether Schumer is "hot enough to be on television". [[spoiler:In TheStinger, Amy reminds the judge she was actually on trial for vehicular manslaughter.]]
* ''Series/PersonOfInterest''. In "Guilty", the latest number is a juror, so Team Machine assume this trope is in play. The Machine arranges for Harold Finch to be on the jury, and [[TheFixer Zoe Morgan]] spends a lot of time rehearsing him on how to sway a jury towards guilty, only to have an OhCrap moment when the juror immediately agrees with this verdict. So then Harold has to become the rogue juror, stalling for time until Team Machine can find out what's really going on.
movie at one point.
* Implied on in ''Series/TheSopranos'' when Uncle Junior is on trial. [[JuryAndWitnessTampering Some of June's associates find one of the jurors]] (buying candy for his son, no less) and gently inform him that [[TheVillainKnowsWhereYouLive they know where he lives]]. In the next episode, the jury is hung with a single holdout, leading to a mistrial -- and that poor juror is hated by all the others.
* On ''Series/PerfectStrangers'', Balki is Subverted in an episode of course this, much to ''Series/ThatGirl'' entitled "[[Film/TwelveAngryMen Eleven Angry Men]] and That Girl" (although not all of the frustration other jurors are male), in which Thomas' character, Ann Marie, is the lone member of a jury convinced that a man accused of striking his wife with an ashtray is innocent. When a male juror makes a pass at her and she slaps him, she realizes that the wife's injuries are on the wrong side of her face for a strike by her right-handed husband. The subversion comes when the husband is acquitted and begins arguing with his wife anew... and grabs a nearby ashtray and hits her across the face ''backhanded'', thereby explaining the anomaly that had persuaded Ann, and the other jurors, including Larry. While his reasons to acquit him.
* {{Inverted|Trope}} in the ''Series/VeronicaMars'' episode "[[Recap/VeronicaMarsS02E10OneAngryVeronica One Angry Veronica]]", in which Veronica is forewoman of a jury, as one member is the single holdout
for believing a ''guilty'' verdict. Over the man innocent seem foolish, his refusal to back down forces course of the others to review episode, the evidence jurors find additional information which does, in order fact, point the finger at the defendants; eventually, there is only one holdout for not guilty, who only agrees to convince him. With this, they eventually realize that vote guilty because he's right.
* An episode of ''Series/TwoTwoSeven'' had an identical plot, only Sandra was
sure the holdout with Mary being among the annoyed fellow jurors. However, Sandra's doubts were much more logical, and after sharing them with Mary, the latter realized that she had a point. They eventually acquitted the man, who turned out to be innocent.
* Claire Greene was this in an episode of ''Series/PromisedLand1996'', wanting to acquit a young woman charged with criminally negligent homicide (her son had wandered out into the street while she was asleep and been hit by a car). With every argument she made, she managed to convince other jurors of the woman's innocence. Unusually for this trope, she turned out to be ''wrong''--only after the trial did she learn that the woman had been arrested for child endangerment ''three'' times prior to this incident and that contrary to the image she'd presented in court, she'd returned to the irresponsible behavior that led to her son's death and was now jeopardizing her daughter.
* ''Series/ForThePeople'': When Judge Byrne is called for jury duty and gets selected (the defense lawyer didn't even pay attention to his responses) he's delighted at the idea of seeing the criminal justice system from another angle. He soon becomes the lone holdout when the rest of the jury votes "guilty" though. After his attempt to explain why the prosecution didn't prove the accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, he gets them to understand even so. They come around to his view and acquit. Unlike in most examples, he admits that most likely the defendant is guilty, but since the prosecution didn't prove it, he should go free.
* An episode of ''Series/{{JAG}}'' had Bud fill this role in an episode. With the twist that after it was over, Harm (who'd been the defense attorney for the case) told him that he thought the defendant really was guilty.
defendants will get off on appeal.



[[folder:Newspaper Comics]]
* A 1994 ''{{ComicStrip/Doonesbury}}'' arc dealt with the tobacco executives who claimed under oath that they did not "believe" nicotine is addictive, despite the vast amounts of evidence to the contrary. In the strip, the executives are prosecuted on perjury charges. Every member of the jury is convinced they are guilty, except for Jeremy Cavendish, who can't decide if the executives are "monsters or idiots." The other jurors argue with him for a long time and he eventually agrees the executives are guilty. He later reveals his change of heart was motivated by his desperate need to visit the restroom.
* A 2014 ''ComicStrip/{{Crankshaft}}'' arc had Crankshaft serving on a jury for a man charged with endangerment for recklessly burning papers in his backyard on a dry, windy day. Most of the jurors think it's open and shut -- Ed believes it's exactly what any normal person would do and can't possibly be illegal.

to:

[[folder:Newspaper Comics]]
[[folder:Print Media]]
* A 1994 ''{{ComicStrip/Doonesbury}}'' arc dealt with 1959 ''Saturday Evening Post'' cover by Creator/NormanRockwell (shown at the tobacco executives who claimed under oath that they did not "believe" nicotine is addictive, despite the vast amounts of evidence to the contrary. In the strip, the executives are prosecuted on perjury charges. Every member top of the jury is convinced they are guilty, except for Jeremy Cavendish, who can't decide if the executives are "monsters or idiots." The other jurors page) depicts a lone female juror holding out while her male counterparts argue heatedly with him for a long time and he eventually agrees the executives are guilty. He later reveals his change of heart was motivated by his desperate need to visit the restroom.
* A 2014 ''ComicStrip/{{Crankshaft}}'' arc had Crankshaft serving on a jury for a man charged with endangerment for recklessly burning papers in his backyard on a dry, windy day. Most of the jurors think it's open and shut -- Ed believes it's exactly what any normal person would do and can't possibly be illegal.
her.



* One episode of ''Radio/AdventuresInOdyssey'' had Eugene on jury duty refusing to convict the defendant until after they discussed the evidence to be sure, much to the displeasure of everyone else who is ready to vote Guilty. The defendant is accused of breaking into a house and robbing its safe but claims that he only broke into the house to be admitted into a gang and they framed him for the robbery. Upon the reexamining the evidence, it is discovered that the victim's safe in question is one made to used in businesses and offices, which require more time to break into, time the defendant didn't have. As a result ten members of the jury change their vote to Not Guilty, leaving another juror becoming the lone Guilty vote. The new lone juror, in his argument for a guilty verdict, reveals that used to be the defendant's coach on a soccer team, and that he had issues with the defendant's behavior at the time. This naturally causes a mistrial, as the juror lied about not knowing the defendant before the trial, as saying otherwise would have immediately disqualified him.

to:

* One episode of ''Radio/AdventuresInOdyssey'' had has Eugene on jury duty refusing to convict the defendant until after they discussed the evidence to be sure, much to the displeasure of everyone else who is ready to vote Guilty. The defendant is accused of breaking into a house and robbing its safe but claims that he only broke into the house to be admitted into a gang and they framed him for the robbery. Upon the reexamining the evidence, it is discovered that the victim's safe in question is one made to used in businesses and offices, which require more time to break into, time the defendant didn't have. As a result ten members of the jury change their vote to Not Guilty, leaving another juror becoming the lone Guilty vote. The new lone juror, in his argument for a guilty verdict, reveals that used to be the defendant's coach on a soccer team, and that he had issues with the defendant's behavior at the time. This naturally causes a mistrial, as the juror lied about not knowing the defendant before the trial, as saying otherwise would have immediately disqualified him.



* Done before the TropeMaker by ''Ladies of the Jury'' (play in 1929, filmed in 1932 and 1937).
* [[VisualNovel/DanganronpaTriggerHappyHavoc Danganronpa: The Stage]] adds a new rule to the DeadlyGame where if the correct culprit is voted by the majority of students, anyone makes an incorrect vote will get executed alongside the culprit. This rule [[CompressedAdaptation allows the stage show to wrap up in less cases than the game does, while still maintaining the same survivors]].
** In the second case, as in the game, [[spoiler:Taka refuses to believe Mondo is guilty due to their brotherly bond. As such, Taka doesn't vote for Mondo, and [[TogetherInDeath ends up executed alongside him]]]].
** To save time, the third case is skipped, meaning that [[spoiler:Hifumi and Celeste]] make it to what was originally the fourth case, where the [[spoiler: latter of the two attacks Sakura before her suicide, in order to sow confusion among the survivors, and give herself a chance to win as the blackened. Celeste and Hifumi both vote for Celeste, while the others vote Sakura as having committed suicide, which turns out to be correct, leaving Hifumi and Celeste to face execution]].

to:

* Done before the TropeMaker by ''Ladies of the Jury'' (play in 1929, filmed in 1932 and 1937).
* [[VisualNovel/DanganronpaTriggerHappyHavoc Danganronpa:
''Theatre/{{Danganronpa}}: The Stage]] Stage'' adds a new rule to the DeadlyGame where if the correct culprit is voted by the majority of students, anyone makes an incorrect vote will get executed alongside the culprit. This rule [[CompressedAdaptation allows the stage show to wrap up in less cases than the game does, while still maintaining the same survivors]].
** In the second case, as in [[VisualNovel/DanganronpaTriggerHappyHavoc the game, game]], [[spoiler:Taka refuses to believe Mondo is guilty due to their brotherly bond. As such, Taka doesn't vote for Mondo, and [[TogetherInDeath ends up executed alongside him]]]].
** To save time, the third case is skipped, meaning that [[spoiler:Hifumi and Celeste]] make it to what was originally the fourth case, where the [[spoiler: wherein [[spoiler:the latter of the two attacks Sakura before her suicide, in order to sow confusion among the survivors, and give herself a chance to win as the blackened. Celeste and Hifumi both vote for Celeste, while the others vote Sakura as having committed suicide, which turns out to be correct, leaving Hifumi and Celeste to face execution]].execution]].
* Done before the {{Trope Maker|s}} by ''Ladies of the Jury'' (play in 1929, filmed in 1932 and 1937).



* Subverted in the webcomic ''Webcomic/{{Superosity}}''. Main character Chris (who is dating Arcadia, the defense attorney) is the only one who thinks a boy is innocent of murder. Then the defendant tells Arcadia he loves her and plans to kill Chris to get her out of the picture -- turns out he ''is'' innocent of this crime, "but not thousands of other murders". Arcadia gets Chris to vote guilty for his own good, but by this time, the other jurors have changed their mind. Finally Chris appeals to the other jurors' worst instincts, such as racism and the desire to be quoted in the newspaper, to get them to change their minds back, and when he succeeds, he declares, "Yippee! The system works! Kinda!".
* PlayedForLaughs ''Webcomic/SuperStupor'', where eleven of the jurors wanted to let an obviously guilty supervillain off for fear of their own lives. (He was on trial for [[ImAHumanitarian eating his last jury]].) A former supervillain is the rogue jury who convinces them all to stand up for what's right...but ultimately, [[BatmanGambit he just did this]] because he's a DeathSeeker himself.

to:

* Subverted in the webcomic ''Webcomic/{{Superosity}}''. Main character Chris (who is dating Arcadia, the defense attorney) is the only one who thinks a boy is innocent of murder. Then the defendant tells Arcadia he loves her and plans to kill Chris to get her out of the picture -- turns out he ''is'' innocent of this crime, "but not thousands of other murders". Arcadia gets Chris to vote guilty for his own good, but by this time, the other jurors have changed their mind. Finally Finally, Chris appeals to the other jurors' worst instincts, such as racism and the desire to be quoted in the newspaper, to get them to change their minds back, and when he succeeds, he declares, "Yippee! The system works! Kinda!".
* PlayedForLaughs ''Webcomic/SuperStupor'', where eleven in ''Webcomic/SuperStupor''. Eleven of the jurors wanted want to let an obviously guilty supervillain off for fear of their own lives. (He was (He's on trial for [[ImAHumanitarian eating his last jury]].) A former supervillain is the rogue jury juror who convinces them all to stand up for what's right...right... but ultimately, [[BatmanGambit he just did this]] because he's a DeathSeeker himself.



* Parodied in ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': [[Characters/TheSimpsonsHomerSimpson Homer Simpson]] votes "not guilty" just to deadlock the jury, because he's enticed by the notion of being sequestered in a free hotel room with free food, free HBO, a free swimming pool, and Film/FreeWilly. It's just coincidence that the defendant was actually innocent.
-->'''Homer:''' I'm only doing what I think is right. I believe Freddy Quimby should walk out of here a [[FreudianSlip free hotel]].
* Viciously spoofed in ''WesternAnimation/RobotChicken'', with "Twelve Angry Little People" (the toys, that is), wherein the protagonist is very, very wrong...

to:

* Parodied {{Inverted|Trope}} in ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': [[Characters/TheSimpsonsHomerSimpson Homer Simpson]] votes "not guilty" just one episode of ''WesternAnimation/AmericanDad''. One of [[{{Jerkass}} Roger]]'s personas is on trial, and despite the fact that it's blatantly obvious that he did it, he uses his charm to deadlock try and KarmaHoudini his way out of it. In this case, [[Characters/AmericanDadStanSmith Stan Smith]] is the Rogue Juror, in that he sees right through Roger's act and is sick and tired of him weaseling his way out of being accountable for his actions. In the end, he gets the jury to convict, but '''everyone''', even the judge, is sobbing like a baby.
* In the ''WesternAnimation/DanVs'' episode "Dan Vs. Jury Duty", [[JerkWithAHeartOfGold Dan]] tries to get a suspect off simply because he approves of the crime in question ([[DisproportionateRetribution destroying a restaurant that never gives enough ketchup]]). He manages to convince most of the jury in about a minute, prompting [[ActionGirl Elise]], who was also on
the jury, because he's enticed by to attack him in anger. They both get kicked off the notion of being sequestered in a free hotel room with free food, free HBO, a free swimming pool, and Film/FreeWilly. It's just coincidence jury, but Dan manages to prove that the defendant guy was actually innocent.
-->'''Homer:''' I'm only doing what I think is right. I believe Freddy Quimby should walk out of here
innocent, as the actual culprit was [[spoiler:Dan himself]].
* ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'': In the episode "[[Recap/FamilyGuyS11E16TwelveAndAHalfAngryMen 12 and
a [[FreudianSlip free hotel]].
* Viciously spoofed in ''WesternAnimation/RobotChicken'', with "Twelve
Half Angry Little People" (the toys, Men]]", a WholePlotReference to ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'', Mayor Adam West is on trial for murdering an aide that is), wherein was planning to blackmail him, and despite Mayor West being covered in blood during a press conference and the protagonist knife used belonging to him, [[Characters/FamilyGuyBrianGriffin Brian Griffin]] votes not guilty. Eventually, he is very, very wrong...able to convince everyone that Mayor West is innocent and he is exonerated. The episode's last scene reveals that West was in fact innocent and that the murder was the work of a serial killer. One that cuts the Griffins' power...
* In ''WesternAnimation/TheFlintstones'', Fred takes up this role in one episode, defending the ObviouslyEvil Mangler, and coming up with ridiculous excuses for him until finally giving up. Because Fred was the jury foreman (and thus the one to announce the verdict), guess who the Mangler goes after once he escapes...
* A memorable episode of ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'' features this trope almost to the letter. [[ButtMonkey Eugene]] is on trial for pulling the fire alarm (apparently, the school rules state that he can only be expelled if found guilty by a jury of his peers), and Arnold (of course) is the only one who thinks he might be innocent and successfully disproves the evidence against him. As it turns out, Eugene was [[FrameUp framed by Curly]], who, as a member of the jury, then proceeds to [[ThePerryMasonMethod flip out and confess to everything]], laughing maniacally all the time.



** [[Characters/KingOfTheHillHankHill Hank Hill]]
*** There is an episode centered around this trope, except the trial was a focus group for the new bells-and-whistles lawnmower that would render Hank's lawnmower obsolete. Hank insists the focus group (including his neighbors and his dad) remain for the scheduled length as he convinces them that the new mower is junk.
*** In another episode, Hank is a member of the city council because he objects to the new law that makes it illegal to install normal toilets in Arlen; it turns out that one of the other councilmen owns the company that makes low-flow toilets and got the law passed. The other councilmen have never used the new toilets, but since city hall has them installed, Hank pulls a filibuster until everyone needs to go to the bathroom and realizes that they're junk.
* A memorable episode of ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'' featured this trope almost to the letter, where [[ButtMonkey Eugene]] was on trial for pulling the fire alarm (apparently the school rules state that he can only be expelled if found guilty by a jury of his peers), and Arnold (of course) is the only one who thinks he might be innocent and successfully disproves the evidence against him. As it turns out, Eugene was [[FrameUp framed by Curly]], who, as a member of the jury, then proceeds to [[ThePerryMasonMethod flip out and confess to everything]], laughing maniacally all the time.
* ''WesternAnimation/PepperAnn'' had Pepper Ann's mother on a jury trying a man for spitting on a security camera. It was actually a fairly close parody of the original ''Twelve Angry Men''.
-->'''Angry Juror Woman:''' I SPIT ON YOU!
-->'''Lydia, smirking:''' You don't REALLY mean you ''spit'' on me, do you?
* In ''WesternAnimation/TheFlintstones'', Fred takes up this role in one episode, defending the ObviouslyEvil Mangler, and coming up with ridiculous excuses for him until finally giving up. Because Fred was the jury foreman (and thus the one to announce the verdict), guess who the Mangler goes after once he escapes...
* [[InvertedTrope Inverted]] in one episode of ''WesternAnimation/AmericanDad.'' One of [[JerkAss Roger]]'s personas is on trial and despite the fact that it's blatantly obvious that he did it, he uses his charm to try and KarmaHoudini his way out of it. In this case, [[Characters/AmericanDadStanSmith Stan Smith]] is the Rogue Juror, in that he sees right through Roger's act and is sick and tired of him weaseling his way out of being accountable for his actions. In the end, he gets the jury to convict, but '''everyone''', even the judge, is sobbing like a baby.
* ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'': In the episode "12 and a Half Angry Men", a WholePlotReference to ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'', Mayor Adam West is on trial for murdering an aide that was planning to blackmail him, and despite Mayor West being covered in blood during a press conference and the knife used belonging to him, [[Characters/FamilyGuyBrianGriffin Brian Griffin]] votes not guilty. Eventually, he is able to convince everyone that Mayor West is innocent and he is exonerated. The episode's last scene reveals that West was in fact innocent and that the murder was the work of a serial killer. One that cuts the Griffins' power...
* In ''WesternAnimation/DanVs'' "Jury Duty," [[JerkWithAHeartOfGold Dan]] tries to get a suspect off simply because he approves of the crime in question ([[DisproportionateRetribution destroying a restaurant that never gives enough ketchup]]). He manages to convince most of the jury in about a minute, prompting [[ActionGirl Elise]], who was also on the jury, to attack him in anger. They both get kicked off the jury, but Dan manages to prove that the guy was innocent, as the actual culprit was [[spoiler:Dan himself]].

to:

** [[Characters/KingOfTheHillHankHill Hank Hill]]
***
There is an episode centered around this trope, except the trial was is a focus group for the new bells-and-whistles lawnmower that would render Hank's [[Characters/KingOfTheHillHankHill Hank]]'s lawnmower obsolete. Hank insists the focus group (including his neighbors and his dad) remain for the scheduled length as he convinces them that the new mower is junk.
*** ** In another episode, Hank is a member of the city council because he objects to the new law that makes it illegal to install normal toilets in Arlen; it turns out that one of the other councilmen owns the company that makes low-flow toilets and got the law passed. The other councilmen have never used the new toilets, but since city hall has them installed, Hank pulls a filibuster until everyone needs to go to the bathroom and realizes that they're junk.
* A memorable episode of ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'' featured this trope almost to the letter, where [[ButtMonkey Eugene]] was on trial for pulling the fire alarm (apparently the school rules state that he can only be expelled if found guilty by a jury of his peers), and Arnold (of course) is the only one who thinks he might be innocent and successfully disproves the evidence against him. As it turns out, Eugene was [[FrameUp framed by Curly]], who, as a member of the jury, then proceeds to [[ThePerryMasonMethod flip out and confess to everything]], laughing maniacally all the time.
junk.
* ''WesternAnimation/PepperAnn'' had has Pepper Ann's mother on a jury trying a man for spitting on a security camera. It was It's actually a fairly close parody of the original ''Twelve ''12 Angry Men''.
-->'''Angry Juror Woman:''' I SPIT ON YOU!
-->'''Lydia,
YOU!\\
'''Lydia,
smirking:''' You don't REALLY ''really'' mean you ''spit'' on me, do you?
* In ''WesternAnimation/TheFlintstones'', Fred takes up this role Viciously spoofed in one episode, defending the ObviouslyEvil Mangler, and coming up ''WesternAnimation/RobotChicken'' with ridiculous excuses for him until finally giving up. Because Fred was the jury foreman (and thus the one to announce the verdict), guess who the Mangler goes after once he escapes...
* [[InvertedTrope Inverted]] in one episode of ''WesternAnimation/AmericanDad.'' One of [[JerkAss Roger]]'s personas is on trial and despite the fact
"Twelve Angry Little People" (the toys, that it's blatantly obvious that he did it, he uses his charm to try and KarmaHoudini his way out of it. In this case, [[Characters/AmericanDadStanSmith Stan Smith]] is is), wherein the Rogue Juror, protagonist is very, very wrong...
* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': Parodied
in that he sees right through Roger's act and is sick and tired of him weaseling his way out of being accountable for his actions. In the end, he gets the jury to convict, but '''everyone''', even the judge, is sobbing like a baby.
* ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'': In
the episode "12 and a Half Angry Men", a WholePlotReference to ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'', Mayor Adam West is on trial for murdering an aide that was planning to blackmail him, and despite Mayor West being covered in blood during a press conference and the knife used belonging to him, [[Characters/FamilyGuyBrianGriffin Brian Griffin]] "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS5E20TheBoyWhoKnewTooMuch The Boy Who Knew Too Much]]". [[Characters/TheSimpsonsHomerSimpson Homer Simpson]] votes not guilty. Eventually, he is able "not guilty" just to convince everyone that Mayor West is innocent and he is exonerated. The episode's last scene reveals that West was in fact innocent and that the murder was the work of a serial killer. One that cuts the Griffins' power...
* In ''WesternAnimation/DanVs'' "Jury Duty," [[JerkWithAHeartOfGold Dan]] tries to get a suspect off simply because he approves of the crime in question ([[DisproportionateRetribution destroying a restaurant that never gives enough ketchup]]). He manages to convince most of the jury in about a minute, prompting [[ActionGirl Elise]], who was also on
deadlock the jury, to attack him in anger. They both get kicked off because he's enticed by the jury, but Dan manages to prove notion of being sequestered in a free hotel room with free food, free HBO, a free swimming pool, and Film/FreeWilly. It's just coincidence that the guy defendant was innocent, as the actual culprit was [[spoiler:Dan himself]]. actually innocent.
-->'''Homer:''' I'm only doing what I think is right. I believe Freddy Quimby should walk out of here a [[FreudianSlip free hotel]].



[[folder:Other]]
* A 1959 ''Saturday Evening Post'' cover by Creator/NormanRockwell (shown at the top of the page) depicts a lone female juror holding out while her male counterparts argue heatedly with her.
[[/folder]]



* Independent India used to have Jury trials for criminal cases until a case called [[https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-9188-case-analysis-km-nanavati-v-s-state-of-maharashtra-1961-.html Nanavati vs Maharashtra]]. In it, Commander K M Nanavati of the Indian Navy arrived back home from a naval deployment to [[{{Cuckold}} catch his wife sleeping with another man]]. An enraged Nanavati shot his wife's lover dead, then surrendered to the authorities. In his trial, the entire jury went rogue and acquitted Nanavati despite indisputable evidence - something which incensed the trial judge. From there on, the entire judiciary banded together and forced jury trials to be abolished, as they surmised that the Indian population couldn't be entrusted with dispensing justice in a dispassionate manner.

to:

* Independent India used to have Jury trials for criminal cases until a case called [[https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-9188-case-analysis-km-nanavati-v-s-state-of-maharashtra-1961-.html Nanavati vs Maharashtra]]. In it, Commander K M Nanavati of the Indian Navy arrived back home from a naval deployment to [[{{Cuckold}} catch his wife sleeping with another man]]. An enraged Nanavati shot his wife's lover dead, then surrendered to the authorities. In his trial, the entire jury went rogue and acquitted Nanavati despite indisputable evidence - -- something which incensed the trial judge. From there on, the entire judiciary banded together and forced jury trials to be abolished, as they surmised that the Indian population couldn't be entrusted with dispensing justice in a dispassionate manner.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/JuliusKatz'': In "Eleven Angry Jurors and One Befuddled Julius," Julius serves on a jury in a murder case that seems to prove the defendant's guilt definitively but, unlike his fellow jurors, picks up on signs that the man is innocent. However, rather than try to convince the other jurors, he asks the judge and lawyers to let him conduct a private SummationGathering with the key parties. If he exposes the killer, then the case won't have to go to the jury, and if he doesn't, then he'll get booted off the jury for having formed such strong opinions and be replaced with an alternate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One ''ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures'' story has Bruce Wayne selected to sit on the jury of a man whom he, as Batman, had arrested trying to kidnap a wealthy couple's baby. As the rest of the jury are taken in by the defendant's innocent act, he has to convince them that the defendant is actually ''guilty''. In an amusing moment, Bruce honestly answers a jury selection question about whether he is fit to sit on the jury by [[SarcasticConfession confessing]] that he is prejudiced about the case because he's actually Batman -- and after everyone stops laughing, the judge tells him to stop jerking around and take things seriously.

to:

** One An issue of ''ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures'' story has Bruce Wayne selected to sit on the jury of a man whom he, as Batman, had arrested he caught trying to kidnap a wealthy couple's baby. As the baby, (as Batman, not Bruce). The rest of the jury are taken in by the defendant's innocent act, so he has to convince them that the defendant is actually ''guilty''. In an amusing moment, Bruce honestly answers a jury selection question about whether he is fit to sit on the jury by [[SarcasticConfession confessing]] that he is prejudiced about the case because he's actually Batman -- and after everyone stops laughing, the judge tells him to stop jerking around and take things seriously.



** On [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/MonkS2E9MrMonkAndTheTwelfthMan Mr. Monk and the 12th Man]], Monk deduces that the victims of a series of seemingly unrelated murders had all served on the same jury. As it tuns out, the suspect was being blackmailed by one of them. However, he didn't know which member of the jury it was, so he [[SerialKillingsSpecificTarget opted to kill everyone in the jury.]]

to:

** On In [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/MonkS2E9MrMonkAndTheTwelfthMan Mr. Monk and the 12th Man]], Monk deduces that the victims of a series of seemingly unrelated murders had all served on the same jury. As it tuns out, the suspect was being blackmailed by one of them. However, he didn't know which member of the jury it was, so he [[SerialKillingsSpecificTarget opted to kill everyone in the jury.]]



* On one episode of ''Series/QuincyME'', the titular character found himself on a jury in an apparently open and shut murder case and proceeded to annoy everyone by continually asking questions about the evidence (and deducing the real killer, of course). This also doubles as an ActorAllusion -- Jack Klugman (Quincy) starred as Juror #5 in the 1957 movie version of ''Film/TwelveAngryMen''.

to:

* On In one episode of ''Series/QuincyME'', the titular character found himself on a jury in an apparently open and shut murder case and proceeded to annoy everyone by continually asking questions about the evidence (and deducing the real killer, of course). This also doubles as an ActorAllusion -- Jack Klugman (Quincy) starred as Juror #5 in the 1957 movie version of ''Film/TwelveAngryMen''.



%%* ''Series/{{Newhart}}'' took a turn with this plot too.

to:

%%* ''Series/{{Newhart}}'' took * ''Series/{{Newhart}}'': In "Twelve Annoyed Men and Women", Dick and George have tickets to a turn with this plot too.New England Patriots game. Dick is the foreman of a jury that has trouble agreeing, and he may miss the game.

Added: 460

Changed: 984

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Parodied in ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': Homer votes "not guilty" just to deadlock the jury, because he's enticed by the notion of being sequestered in a free hotel room with free food, free HBO, a free swimming pool, and Film/FreeWilly. It's just coincidence that the defendant was actually innocent.

to:

* Parodied in ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': [[Characters/TheSimpsonsHomerSimpson Homer Simpson]] votes "not guilty" just to deadlock the jury, because he's enticed by the notion of being sequestered in a free hotel room with free food, free HBO, a free swimming pool, and Film/FreeWilly. It's just coincidence that the defendant was actually innocent.



** There is an episode centered around this trope, except the trial was a focus group for the new bells-and-whistles lawnmower that would render Hank's lawnmower obsolete. Hank insists the focus group (including his neighbors and his dad) remain for the scheduled length as he convinces them that the new mower is junk.
** In another episode, Hank is a member of the city council because he objects to the new law that makes it illegal to install normal toilets in Arlen; it turns out that one of the other councilmen owns the company that makes low-flow toilets and got the law passed. The other councilmen have never used the new toilets, but since city hall has them installed, Hank pulls a filibuster until everyone needs to go to the bathroom and realizes that they're junk.

to:

** [[Characters/KingOfTheHillHankHill Hank Hill]]
***
There is an episode centered around this trope, except the trial was a focus group for the new bells-and-whistles lawnmower that would render Hank's lawnmower obsolete. Hank insists the focus group (including his neighbors and his dad) remain for the scheduled length as he convinces them that the new mower is junk.
** *** In another episode, Hank is a member of the city council because he objects to the new law that makes it illegal to install normal toilets in Arlen; it turns out that one of the other councilmen owns the company that makes low-flow toilets and got the law passed. The other councilmen have never used the new toilets, but since city hall has them installed, Hank pulls a filibuster until everyone needs to go to the bathroom and realizes that they're junk.



* [[InvertedTrope Inverted]] in one episode of ''WesternAnimation/AmericanDad.'' One of [[JerkAss Roger]]'s personas is on trial and despite the fact that it's blatantly obvious that he did it, he uses his charm to try and KarmaHoudini his way out of it. In this case, Stan is the Rogue Juror, in that he sees right through Roger's act and is sick and tired of him weaseling his way out of being accountable for his actions. In the end, he gets the jury to convict, but '''everyone''', even the judge, is sobbing like a baby.
* ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'': In the episode "12 and a Half Angry Men", a WholePlotReference to ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'', Mayor Adam West is on trial for murdering an aide that was planning to blackmail him, and despite Mayor West being covered in blood during a press conference and the knife used belonging to him, Brian votes not guilty. Eventually, he is able to convince everyone that Mayor West is innocent and he is exonerated. The episode's last scene reveals that West was in fact innocent and that the murder was the work of a serial killer. One that cuts the Griffins' power...

to:

* [[InvertedTrope Inverted]] in one episode of ''WesternAnimation/AmericanDad.'' One of [[JerkAss Roger]]'s personas is on trial and despite the fact that it's blatantly obvious that he did it, he uses his charm to try and KarmaHoudini his way out of it. In this case, [[Characters/AmericanDadStanSmith Stan Smith]] is the Rogue Juror, in that he sees right through Roger's act and is sick and tired of him weaseling his way out of being accountable for his actions. In the end, he gets the jury to convict, but '''everyone''', even the judge, is sobbing like a baby.
* ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'': In the episode "12 and a Half Angry Men", a WholePlotReference to ''Film/TwelveAngryMen'', Mayor Adam West is on trial for murdering an aide that was planning to blackmail him, and despite Mayor West being covered in blood during a press conference and the knife used belonging to him, [[Characters/FamilyGuyBrianGriffin Brian Griffin]] votes not guilty. Eventually, he is able to convince everyone that Mayor West is innocent and he is exonerated. The episode's last scene reveals that West was in fact innocent and that the murder was the work of a serial killer. One that cuts the Griffins' power...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Earlier in the 2nd season, a wealthy man was blackmailed by a rogue juror for killing his wife,got tired of being in thumbscrews, and decided to kill his blackmailer. However, he didn't know which member of the jury it was. so he opted to kill everyone in the jury.

to:

** Earlier in On [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/MonkS2E9MrMonkAndTheTwelfthMan Mr. Monk and the 2nd season, 12th Man]], Monk deduces that the victims of a wealthy man series of seemingly unrelated murders had all served on the same jury. As it tuns out, the suspect was being blackmailed by a rogue juror for killing his wife,got tired one of being in thumbscrews, and decided to kill his blackmailer. them. However, he didn't know which member of the jury it was. was, so he [[SerialKillingsSpecificTarget opted to kill everyone in the jury.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Played by ''Series/{{Castle}}'' in a case where a juror is poisoned; he's killed before deliberations start, but it's revealed that he managed to get himself placed on the jury in the first place in order so that he could act as one of these. [[spoiler:Specifically, he knows that the defendant didn't commit the crime because his brother was with the person who did at the time, but while he doesn't want to throw his brother to the wolves he can't in good conscience let an innocent man go to jail for it.]]

to:

* Played by ''Series/{{Castle}}'' ''Series/{{Castle|2009}}'' in a case where a juror is poisoned; he's killed before deliberations start, but it's revealed that he managed to get himself placed on the jury in the first place in order so that he could act as one of these. [[spoiler:Specifically, he knows that the defendant didn't commit the crime because his brother was with the person who did at the time, but while he doesn't want to throw his brother to the wolves he can't in good conscience let an innocent man go to jail for it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The arc regarding Greg's AccidentalMurder of Demitrius James in the defense of a man he and a mob were beating up has Sanders trying to defend himself in court and, overall, what looked like an open-and-shut case (Greg saw the crowd, he tried to scare them off with his car, James tried to attack instead, he hit him with the car because he couldn't brake in time, it's all clear) turns into a circus of accusing Greg of alleged PoliceBrutality, racism and even the possibility of having been a DrunkDriver during the act (thus ending with the James family forming IrrationalHatred for cops in general and Greg in specific) because of a jackass juror that wishes "all of the facts being brought to light" and won't vote until he hears them (even interrupting testimonies to question the witnesses).

to:

** The arc regarding Greg's AccidentalMurder of Demitrius James in the defense of a man he and a mob were beating up has Sanders trying to defend himself in court and, overall, what looked like an open-and-shut case OpenAndShutCase (Greg saw the crowd, he tried to scare them off with his car, James tried to attack instead, he hit him with the car because he couldn't brake in time, it's all clear) turns into a circus of accusing Greg of alleged PoliceBrutality, racism and even the possibility of having been a DrunkDriver during the act (thus ending with the James family forming IrrationalHatred for cops in general and Greg in specific) because of a jackass juror that wishes "all of the facts being brought to light" and won't vote until he hears them (even interrupting testimonies to question the witnesses).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:345:Hazing the holdout, [[GoodSmokingEvilSmoking quite literally so.]]]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:345:Hazing the holdout, [[GoodSmokingEvilSmoking quite literally so.]]]]
so]].]]



** ''Comicbook/BatmanAdventures'' once had Bruce Wayne selected to sit on the jury of a man whom he, as Batman, had arrested trying to kidnap a wealthy couple's baby. As the rest of the jury were taken in by the defendant's innocent act, he had to convince them that the defendant was actually ''guilty''. Contained an amusing moment where Bruce, honestly answering a jury selection question about whether he was fit to sit on the jury, [[SarcasticConfession confessed]] that he was prejudiced about the case because he was actually Batman — and after everyone stopped laughing, the judge told him to stop jerking around and take things seriously.
** The ''Comicbook/BatmanTomKing'' storyline "Cold Days" has Bruce, questioning himself in the wake of his aborted wedding, arrange to be on the jury for Mr Freeze's trial, where he's the only juror asking hard questions about Batman's involvement, and asking if being a supervillain is necessarily evidence that Freeze is guilty of this particular crime.

to:

** ''Comicbook/BatmanAdventures'' once had One ''ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures'' story has Bruce Wayne selected to sit on the jury of a man whom he, as Batman, had arrested trying to kidnap a wealthy couple's baby. As the rest of the jury were are taken in by the defendant's innocent act, he had has to convince them that the defendant was is actually ''guilty''. Contained In an amusing moment where Bruce, moment, Bruce honestly answering answers a jury selection question about whether he was is fit to sit on the jury, jury by [[SarcasticConfession confessed]] confessing]] that he was is prejudiced about the case because he was he's actually Batman -- and after everyone stopped stops laughing, the judge told tells him to stop jerking around and take things seriously.
** The ''Comicbook/BatmanTomKing'' storyline "Cold Days" has Bruce, questioning himself in the wake of his aborted wedding, arrange to be on the jury for Mr Mr. Freeze's trial, where he's the only juror asking hard questions about Batman's involvement, and asking if being a supervillain is necessarily evidence that Freeze is guilty of this particular crime.



* A ''ComicBook/SpiderMan'' story from the late '80s involved a jury deliberating over the fate of an accused criminal apprehended by Spider-Man. Making matters problematic is the holdout juror is Mary Jane Watson-Parker... Spider-Man's wife!

to:

* A ''ComicBook/SpiderMan'' story from the late '80s involved 1980s involves a jury deliberating over the fate of an accused criminal apprehended by Spider-Man. Making matters problematic is the holdout juror is Mary Jane Watson-Parker... Spider-Man's wife!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Independent India used to have Jury trials for criminal cases until a case called [[https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-9188-case-analysis-km-nanavati-v-s-state-of-maharashtra-1961-.html Nanavati vs Maharashtra]]. In it, Commander K M Nanavati of the Indian Navy arrived back home from a naval deployment to [[{{Cuckold}} catch his wife sleeping with another man]]. An enraged Nanavati shot his wife’s lover dead, then surrendered to the authorities. In his trial, the entire jury went rogue and acquitted Nanavati despite indisputable evidence - something which incensed the trial judge. From there on, the entire judiciary banded together and forced jury trials to be abolished, as they surmised that the Indian population couldn’t be entrusted with dispensing justice in a dispassionate manner.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sometimes another main character will also be on the jury, and will try to change the Rogue Juror's mind. More commonly, the Rogue Juror will manage to gradually bring the rest of the jurors around to his/her view. Occasionally this will be subverted with the acquitted defendant [[KarmaHoudini turning out to actually be guilty]], or perhaps with [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome the jury remaining deadlocked and forcing the case to a retrial]].

to:

Sometimes another main character will also be on the jury, and will try to change the Rogue Juror's mind. More commonly, the Rogue Juror will manage to gradually bring the rest of the jurors around to his/her their view. Occasionally this will be subverted with the acquitted defendant [[KarmaHoudini turning out to actually be guilty]], or perhaps with [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome the jury remaining deadlocked and forcing the case to a retrial]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A 2014 ''ComicStrip/{{Crankshaft}}'' arc had Crankshaft serving on a jury for a man charged with endangerment for recklessly burning papers in his backyard on a dry, windy day. Most of the jurors think it's open and shut -- Ed believes it's exactly what any normal person would do and can't possibly be illegal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One episode of ''Radio/AdventuresInOdyssey'' had Eugene on jury duty refusing to convict the defendant until after they discussed the evidence to be sure. The defendant is accused of breaking into a house and robbing its vault but claims that he only broke into the house to be admitted into a gang and they framed him for the robbery. The jury eventually agrees that he is telling the truth because he would not have had enough time to break into the vault during the times between when he was seen on the day the crime took place.

to:

* One episode of ''Radio/AdventuresInOdyssey'' had Eugene on jury duty refusing to convict the defendant until after they discussed the evidence to be sure. sure, much to the displeasure of everyone else who is ready to vote Guilty. The defendant is accused of breaking into a house and robbing its vault safe but claims that he only broke into the house to be admitted into a gang and they framed him for the robbery. The jury eventually agrees Upon the reexamining the evidence, it is discovered that he is telling the truth because he would not have had enough victim's safe in question is one made to used in businesses and offices, which require more time to break into into, time the vault during defendant didn't have. As a result ten members of the times between when he was seen on jury change their vote to Not Guilty, leaving another juror becoming the day lone Guilty vote. The new lone juror, in his argument for a guilty verdict, reveals that used to be the crime took place.defendant's coach on a soccer team, and that he had issues with the defendant's behavior at the time. This naturally causes a mistrial, as the juror lied about not knowing the defendant before the trial, as saying otherwise would have immediately disqualified him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Claire Greene was this in an episode of ''Promised Land'', wanting to acquit a young woman charged with criminally negligent homicide (her son had wandered out into the street while she was asleep and been hit by a car). With every argument she made, she managed to convince other jurors of the woman's innocence. Unusually for this trope, she turned out to be ''wrong''--only after the trial did she learn that the woman had been arrested for child endangerment ''three'' times prior to this incident and that contrary to the image she'd presented in court, she'd returned to the irresponsible behavior that led to her son's death and was now jeopardizing her daughter.

to:

* Claire Greene was this in an episode of ''Promised Land'', ''Series/PromisedLand1996'', wanting to acquit a young woman charged with criminally negligent homicide (her son had wandered out into the street while she was asleep and been hit by a car). With every argument she made, she managed to convince other jurors of the woman's innocence. Unusually for this trope, she turned out to be ''wrong''--only after the trial did she learn that the woman had been arrested for child endangerment ''three'' times prior to this incident and that contrary to the image she'd presented in court, she'd returned to the irresponsible behavior that led to her son's death and was now jeopardizing her daughter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Earlier in the 1st season, a guy was blackmailed by a rogue juror for killing his wife, but he didn't know who he was so he opted to kill everyone in the jury he was in.

to:

** Earlier in the 1st 2nd season, a guy wealthy man was blackmailed by a rogue juror for killing his wife, but wife,got tired of being in thumbscrews, and decided to kill his blackmailer. However, he didn't know who he was which member of the jury it was. so he opted to kill everyone in the jury he was in.jury.

Added: 590

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[DownplayedTrope Downplayed]] in ''Film/TheRunawayJury'': the rogue juror's task was simply to make the other jurors follow their own predilections rather than actively changing their minds.

to:

* [[DownplayedTrope Downplayed]] in ''Film/TheRunawayJury'': ''Film/RunawayJury'': the rogue juror's task was simply to make the other jurors follow their own predilections rather than actively changing their minds.minds.
* In the early Creator/AlfredHitchcock whodunnit ''Film/{{Murder}}'', the jury at Diana Baring's murder trial initially includes seven "guilty" votes, three "not guilty", and two undecided. However, the two undecided jurors and two of the "not guilty" voters are almost immediately persuaded to vote for conviction, so that the rest of the deliberation embodies the "rogue juror" setup as the lone holdout, Sir John Menier, tries to explain why he doesn't think the evidence against Diana adds up. But as he is unable to do so convincingly, he is ultimately browbeaten into voting "guilty".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* One of ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'''s short stories sees Harry Dresden (very grudgingly) sitting on the jury for a homicide trial. The other eleven jurors are convinced the defendant is guilty, but Harry quickly figures out that the "victim" was actually a vampire and the defendant killed him in defense of an innocent girl. Harry ends up rescuing the girl from another vampire who is holding her captive to prevent her from testifying in the defendant's defense, then refuses to give a guilty verdict, leading to a hung jury. Upon finding out that the girl the defendant saved was found, the prosecutor decides to drop the charges.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sometimes another main character will also be on the jury, and will try to change the Rogue Juror's mind. More commonly, the Rogue Juror will manage to gradually bring the rest of the jurors around to his/her view. Occasionally this will be subverted with the acquitted defendant [[KarmaHoudini turning out to actually be guilty]], or with [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome the jury remaining deadlocked and forcing a retrial]].

Note that in real life, many jurisdictions do ''not'' require a unanimous jury verdict, either for conviction or acquittal. However, unanimity is a characteristic of the English judicial system and those of its former colonies such as the United States (although the modern UK and US don't always require it, either). Outside of those countries, a Rogue Juror's objection would be futile.

to:

Sometimes another main character will also be on the jury, and will try to change the Rogue Juror's mind. More commonly, the Rogue Juror will manage to gradually bring the rest of the jurors around to his/her view. Occasionally this will be subverted with the acquitted defendant [[KarmaHoudini turning out to actually be guilty]], or perhaps with [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome the jury remaining deadlocked and forcing the case to a retrial]].

Note that in real life, many jurisdictions do ''not'' require a unanimous jury verdict, either whether for conviction or acquittal. However, unanimity is a characteristic of the English judicial system and those of its former colonies such as the United States (although the modern UK and US don't always require it, either). Outside of those countries, a Rogue Juror's objection would be futile.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sometimes another main character will also be on the jury, and will try to change the Rogue Juror's mind. More commonly, the Rogue Juror will manage to gradually bring the rest of the jurors around to his/her view. Occasionally this will be subverted by having the defendant turn out to actually be guilty.

to:

Sometimes another main character will also be on the jury, and will try to change the Rogue Juror's mind. More commonly, the Rogue Juror will manage to gradually bring the rest of the jurors around to his/her view. Occasionally this will be subverted by having with the acquitted defendant turn [[KarmaHoudini turning out to actually be guilty.
guilty]], or with [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome the jury remaining deadlocked and forcing a retrial]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note that in real life, many jurisdictions do ''not'' require a unanimous jury verdict, either for conviction or acquittal. However, unanimity is a characteristic of the English judicial system and many of its former colonies such as the United States (although the modern UK and US don't always require it, either). Outside of those countries, a Rogue Juror's objection would be futile.

to:

Note that in real life, many jurisdictions do ''not'' require a unanimous jury verdict, either for conviction or acquittal. However, unanimity is a characteristic of the English judicial system and many those of its former colonies such as the United States (although the modern UK and US don't always require it, either). Outside of those countries, a Rogue Juror's objection would be futile.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


You've seen it a million times: a character is [[JuryDuty serving on a jury]] and is the lone person holding out for a "not guilty" verdict.

to:

You've seen it this one a million times: a character is [[JuryDuty serving on a jury]] for a criminal trial, and is the lone person holding out for a "not guilty" verdict.



Note that in many jurisdictions, a unanimous jury verdict is not required either to convict or acquit. However, unanimity is a characteristic of the English judicial system and many of its former colonies such as the United States (the modern UK and US also don't always require it, though). Outside of those countries, a Rogue Juror's objection would be futile.

to:

Note that in real life, many jurisdictions, jurisdictions do ''not'' require a unanimous jury verdict is not required verdict, either to convict for conviction or acquit. acquittal. However, unanimity is a characteristic of the English judicial system and many of its former colonies such as the United States (the (although the modern UK and US also don't always require it, though).either). Outside of those countries, a Rogue Juror's objection would be futile.

Top