Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!This trope is [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=17139615510.14880800 under discussion]] in the Administrivia/TropeRepairShop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 88 (click to see context) from:
-->'''President''': Jesus, Gene, how do you think I am? How many casyalties?
to:
-->'''President''': Jesus, Gene, how do you think I am? How many casyalties?casualties?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
* In ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'', after Shifu is finally persuaded to train the (by now thoroughly demoralized) Po:
to:
* In ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'', ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda1'', after Shifu is finally persuaded to train the (by now thoroughly demoralized) Po:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 213,214 (click to see context) from:
* We havet a double DoubleDontKnow starting at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and won't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and won't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
to:
* We havet have a double DoubleDontKnow starting at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying theydidb't didn't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and won't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Crosswicking
Added DiffLines:
* ''WesternAnimation/ACharlieBrownChristmas'': After failing to get the cast of the play to focus, Charlie Brown is sent out to get a Christmas tree for the play. As he walks out the door with Linus, Charlie Brown says "I don't know, Linus. I just don't know."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 116 (click to see context) from:
* In ''Lost Mission'', the first book of Daniel Young and Joshua James' nine-volume ''Oblivion'' series, a group of discredited ex-police and ex-military members has discovered that a death-worshipping religious cult named the Oblivion has shapeshifters disguised as people so they can fit in, either massacring dozens or hundreds at a time or committing suicide bombings that the shapeshifters themselves will not be killed by, allowing them to then go on to kill more people. This discovery (plus the things they did to find out) has made their group wanted fugitives. Worse, the people they're going to rendezvous with off-world are untrustworthy and will probably come after them too, so they have nowhere to go. Ben gives the other members of the group an excuse as to why they should go on a search mission to find the military ship captained by his father, which has gone missing:
to:
* In ''Lost Mission'', ''[[https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07Y8RK2QT?binding=kindle_edition&ref_=dbs_s_ks_series_rwt_tkin&qid=1699590881&sr=1-1 Lost Mission]]'', the first book of Daniel Young and Joshua James' nine-volume ''Oblivion'' series, a group of discredited ex-police and ex-military members has discovered that a death-worshipping religious cult named the Oblivion has shapeshifters disguised as people so they can fit in, either massacring dozens or hundreds at a time or committing suicide bombings that the shapeshifters themselves will not be killed by, allowing them to then go on to kill more people. This discovery (plus the things they did to find out) has made their group wanted fugitives. Worse, the people they're going to rendezvous with off-world are untrustworthy and will probably come after them too, so they have nowhere to go. Ben gives the other members of the group an excuse as to why they should go on a search mission to find the military ship captained by his father, which has gone missing:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
* In '''Film/BarbariansAtTheGate''', a fictionalized account of a real event, Henry Kravitz is explaining to his wife Caroline about his attempt to buy the RJR Nabisco conglomerate in a leveraged buy out in competitiion with F. Ross Johnson, RJR's CEO. Kravitz thinks Johnson is stalling and is not complying with legal requirements.
to:
* In '''Film/BarbariansAtTheGate''', ''Film/BarbariansAtTheGate'', a fictionalized account of a real event, Henry Kravitz is explaining to his wife Caroline about his attempt to buy the RJR Nabisco conglomerate in a leveraged buy out in competitiion with F. Ross Johnson, RJR's CEO. Kravitz thinks Johnson is stalling and is not complying with legal requirements.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* In '''Film/BarbariansAtTheGate''', a fictionalized account of a real event, Henry Kravitz is explaining to his wife Caroline about his attempt to buy the RJR Nabisco conglomerate in a leveraged buy out in competitiion with F. Ross Johnson, RJR's CEO. Kravitz thinks Johnson is stalling and is not complying with legal requirements.
-->'''Henry''': They're absolutely stonewalling us... There's no way for George and me can come up with a realistic bid for the company without knowing its true value. And the law says Johnson's people have to cooperate with would-be buyers. They have to tell us all they know about the company's assets, their liabilities, where it's healthy, where it's not. Now, out of fear, or loyalty, or acting on Johnson's orders, I don't know, but not one of them will tell us a thing. We've got less than a week to make an offer, we're flying totally blind.
-->'''Caroline''': Do you honestly need Nabisco, Henry? Aren't there other companies that'd make you just as happy?
-->'''Henry''': It's not the company... it's the credibility. ''My'' credibilty. I can't just sit on the bench and let other people play the game. Not My game. Not with their rules.
-->'''Caroline''': So coach, what are you going to do?
-->'''Henry''': I don't know. I just... don't... know.
-->'''Henry''': They're absolutely stonewalling us... There's no way for George and me can come up with a realistic bid for the company without knowing its true value. And the law says Johnson's people have to cooperate with would-be buyers. They have to tell us all they know about the company's assets, their liabilities, where it's healthy, where it's not. Now, out of fear, or loyalty, or acting on Johnson's orders, I don't know, but not one of them will tell us a thing. We've got less than a week to make an offer, we're flying totally blind.
-->'''Caroline''': Do you honestly need Nabisco, Henry? Aren't there other companies that'd make you just as happy?
-->'''Henry''': It's not the company... it's the credibility. ''My'' credibilty. I can't just sit on the bench and let other people play the game. Not My game. Not with their rules.
-->'''Caroline''': So coach, what are you going to do?
-->'''Henry''': I don't know. I just... don't... know.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* In ''Film/{{Hellfighters}}'', Chance tells Madeline that Greg, who took over the company, is in trouble and Chance is going to have to go help him. He admits this was bound to happen, and if it happens again, he'll go. Chance's work putting out oil fires is what broke up their first marriage; how does she feel this will affect things?
-->'''Madeline''': I don't know. I honestly don't know.
-->'''Madeline''': I don't know. I honestly don't know.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 204,205 (click to see context) from:
* We get a double DoubleDdontKnow starting at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and wson't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and wson't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
to:
* We get havet a double DoubleDdontKnow DoubleDontKnow starting at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. andwson't won't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 204 (click to see context) from:
* We get a double doublre don't know starting at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
to:
* We get a double doublre don't know DoubleDdontKnow starting at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 204,205 (click to see context) from:
* at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know.
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know.
to:
* We get a double doublre don't know starting at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court:
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and wson't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know. They're just saying they didb't do it, and are upset that people have insinuated that they did do it. However, we don't know who did it, but somebody submitted something that got into the court record, and the person it is attributed to, says "I never did that." And as the ADF Legal points out, "it could be that guy did submit it. and wson't admit it. We don't know, we don't know."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 204 (click to see context) from:
* at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court.
to:
* at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court. Court:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 203 (click to see context) from:
'''Fryer:''' I don't know. Maybe it's, "I suck." I don’t know. I really don't know. But it was extraordinarily frustrating to me because this is something that matters so much. And it felt like there was a wedge to really make progress
to:
'''Fryer:''' I don't know. Maybe it's, "I suck." I don’t know. I really don't know. But it was extraordinarily frustrating to me because this is something that matters so much. And it felt like there was a wedge to really make progress progress.
* at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court.
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know.
* at about 1:15 in a Website/YouTube video [[https://youtu.be/q-E4cJtzARU found here]], Steve Lehto, a lawyer in Michigan, read a report of a false document allgedly submitted to the United States Supreme Court.
-->Interestingly, after reading [ADF Legal's] statement...they still admit that what was presented to the court may have been fake, they don't know, they don't know.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 200 (click to see context) from:
* In [[https://freakonomics.com/podcast/roland-fryer-refuses-to-lie-to-black-america/ episode 516]] of the ''Freakonomics'' podcast "Roland Fryer Refuses to Lie to Black America", Harvard economics professor Roland Fryer (who is black) released a controversial study on police use of force, using federally collected data and data from 10 cities, showing that while police do tend to use force on blacks than whites, as far as police shootings are concerned, "What we found there was no racial differences whatsoever in lethal uses of force." He tried to convince federal officials to change some practices both to get better reporting, and to incentivize ways to make local law enforcement use of force less likely. He did not have much success:
to:
* In [[https://freakonomics.com/podcast/roland-fryer-refuses-to-lie-to-black-america/ episode 516]] of the ''Freakonomics'' podcast "Roland Fryer Refuses to Lie to Black America", Harvard economics professor Roland Fryer (who is black) released a controversial study on police use of force, using federally collected data and data from 10 cities, showing that while police do tend to use force on blacks more than on whites, as far as police shootings are concerned, "What we found there was no racial differences whatsoever in lethal uses of force." He tried to convince federal officials to change some practices both to get better reporting, and to incentivize ways to make local law enforcement use of force less likely. He did not have much success:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* In ''Series/HillStreetBlues'' Season 3, Episode 11, "No Body's Perfect," Nate, a trainee police officer, is talking to his partner who has had years in the precinct, after a harrowing pursuit including where the perpetrator held Nate hostage before Nate knocked him down and captured him, about is misgivings.
--> '''Nate''': I don't think I'm cut out to be a police officer. I'm gonna quit.
--> '''Bobby''': That's up to you, Nate. But if you do, don't do it because you think you're a coward. There's all kinds of bravery, brother, and you're showing me a lot of it right now.
--> '''Nate''': I don't know, I just don't know.
--> '''Nate''': I don't think I'm cut out to be a police officer. I'm gonna quit.
--> '''Bobby''': That's up to you, Nate. But if you do, don't do it because you think you're a coward. There's all kinds of bravery, brother, and you're showing me a lot of it right now.
--> '''Nate''': I don't know, I just don't know.
Changed line(s) 154 (click to see context) from:
* In the Season 8 finale of ''Series/{{Suits}}'', Thomas, a furniture manufacturer owner (and Donna's current love interest) has a handshake agreement to sell furniture to all of a real estate client's shopping malls, [[spoiler: is going to betray Thomas' company by using them as a stalking horse for getting better terms from a competing manufacturer]]. Donna, not knowing what has happened, sees Harvey's face and queries him. He admits what is happening but asks her to wait while he tries to arrange a replacement deal. Donna goes on her date, and Thomas tells her about how he got a really sweet deal from his current landlord, but this offer is only good until noon tomorrow. Worried he might get no deal at all, Donna tells him what's happening. He immediately takes the current offer and puts out a press release. The mall company is going to sue them for violating privilege. Louis wants to know how thid happened:
to:
* In the Season 8 finale of ''Series/{{Suits}}'', Thomas, a furniture manufacturer owner (and Donna's current love interest) has a handshake agreement to sell furniture to all of a real estate client's shopping malls, [[spoiler: is going to betray Thomas' company by using them as a stalking horse for getting better terms from a competing manufacturer]]. Donna, not knowing what has happened, sees Harvey's face and queries him. He admits what is happening but asks her to wait while he tries to arrange a replacement deal. Donna goes on her date, and Thomas tells her about how he got a really sweet deal from his current landlord, but this offer is only good until noon tomorrow. Worried he might get no deal at all, Donna tells him what's happening. He immediately takes the current offer and puts out a press release. The mall company is going to sue them for violating privilege. Louis wants to know how thid this happened:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
-->'''Gene''': I don't know, for Christ's sake!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 78 (click to see context) from:
* In ''Film/TheSumOfAllFears'', the US President [spoiler:was whisked out of the Baltimore football stadium before a nuclear bomb goes off]. His aide asks:
to:
* In ''Film/TheSumOfAllFears'', the US President [spoiler:was [[spoiler:was whisked out of the Baltimore football stadium before a nuclear bomb goes off].off]]. His aide asks:
