Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Whoops
Deleted line(s) 17,18 (click to see context) :
'''''Important Notes:'''''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Porting this over from the Main Video Games page for consistency
'''''Important Notes:'''''
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it. Nor is it horrible just because it has was review bombed on Steam, Amazon, and/or Metacritic.[[note]]''VideoGame/Overwatch2'', a flood perfectly functional game, currently holds the record for the most negatively reviewed game on Steam -- most of negative the reviews on Amazon.com are complaints about the microtransactions and Metacritic. its developer, Creator/BlizzardEntertainment.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No need to single out a specific game, especially since Diablo III is actually very well-rated overall nowadays. Thread
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic.[[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic.[[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't Horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic.[[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
to:
# A game isn't Horrible horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic.[[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
1. Main/ namespace is unneed. 2. Stealth gushing.
Changed line(s) 19,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't Horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it.[[note]]Rerez in particular tends to review games that DO qualify, but not everything they've reviewed does.[[/note]] Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic.[[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
# Also, a game isn't Horrible just because it's a [[Main/TheProblemWithLicensedGames poorly-made licensed tie-in]] or a [[Main/PortingDisaster bad port]]. However, if it's a terrible game on its own or a particularly horrendous port, then it can be listed here.
# Also, a game isn't Horrible just because it's a [[Main/TheProblemWithLicensedGames poorly-made licensed tie-in]] or a [[Main/PortingDisaster bad port]]. However, if it's a terrible game on its own or a particularly horrendous port, then it can be listed here.
to:
# A game isn't Horrible just because WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd, [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it.[[note]]Rerez in particular tends to review games that DO qualify, but not everything they've reviewed does.[[/note]] Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic.[[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. Though once it is listed, the Caustic Critics can provide the detailed review(s).
# Also, a game isn't Horrible just because it's a[[Main/TheProblemWithLicensedGames [[TheProblemWithLicensedGames poorly-made licensed tie-in]] or a [[Main/PortingDisaster [[PortingDisaster bad port]]. However, if it's a terrible game on its own or a particularly horrendous port, then it can be listed here.
# Also, a game isn't Horrible just because it's a
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic reviewed it. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# Also, a game isn't Horrible just because it's a [[Main/TheProblemWithLicensedGames poorly-made licensed tie-in]] or a [[Main/PortingDisaster bad port]]. However, if it's a terrible game on its own or a particularly horrendous port, then it can be listed here.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Chained Sinkholes.
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]].it. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, {{WebVideo/Rerez}} or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Ah...this is just confusing
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2014-present)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2014-present)(2004-present)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2004-present)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2004-present)(2014-present)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2003)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2003)(1993-2013)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2013)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2013)(1993-2003)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
correction
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2014-present)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2014-present)(2004-present)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2004-present)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2004-present)(2014-present)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18,19 (click to see context) from:
# Merely being offensive in its subject matter is not sufficient. Hard as it is to imagine at times, [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment there is a market for all types of deviancy]], no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this.
to:
# Merely being offensive in its subject matter is not sufficient. Hard as it is to imagine at times, [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment there is a market for all types of deviancy]], deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 18,19 (click to see context) from:
# Merely being offensive in its subject matter is not sufficient. Hard as it is to imagine at times, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement there is a market for all types of deviancy]], no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this.
to:
# Merely being offensive in its subject matter is not sufficient. Hard as it is to imagine at times, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment there is a market for all types of deviancy]], no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 25,27 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFirstToFourth First - Fourth]] (1972-1996)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2007)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2005-present)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2007)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]] (2005-present)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFirstToFourth First - Fourth]] (1972-1996)
(1972-1999)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]](1993-2007)
(1993-2013)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]](2005-present)(2004-present)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]]
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Don't watch the guy much, but he seems to be rather high up on the critics's list in terms of fame.
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/AngryJoe, WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Please no. 1. That wiki's a gamergate affiliate. 2. It was founded by a disgruntled ex-troper who was banned because he kept trying to add Depression Quest here and wouldn't take no for an answer. 3. Most of the games listed there do not qualify for this trope, with many actually being popular and highly successful, like No Mans Sky or Final Fantasy 13. If anything, it's as credible as the Irate Gamer. And for future reference, keep the Awful Movies wiki and Terrible Shows wiki off here too.
Deleted line(s) 16,17 (click to see context) :
The WikiRule [[http://crappy-games.wikia.com/wiki/Crappy_Games_Wiki now applies to this trope]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
The WikiRule [[http://crappy-games.wikia.com/wiki/Crappy_Games_Wiki now applies to this trope]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
So...if the maker doesn't say it's bad then it can't be put here?
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, and even the game makers admitting it, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, and even the game makers admitting it, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, and even the game makers admitting it, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The sixth generation effectively ended around 2007, even if the last PS 2 game was released in 2013.
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2013)
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]] (1993-2013)(1993-2007)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
!!Examples in alphabetical order, and grouped by console generation
to:
!!Examples in alphabetical order, and grouped split by console generationgeneration:
Changed line(s) 25,27 (click to see context) from:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFirstToFourth First - Fourth]]
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]]
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]]
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth - Sixth]]
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh Onwards]]
to:
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFirstToFourth First - Fourth]]
Fourth]] (1972-1996)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth -Sixth]]
Sixth]] (1993-2013)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards SeventhOnwards]]Onwards]] (2005-present)
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsFifthToSixth Fifth -
* [[Horrible/VideoGameGenerationsSeventhOnwards Seventh
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, WebVideo/UrinatingTree, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, WebVideo/UrinatingTree, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
to:
# A game isn't horrible just because ''WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd'', [[WebVideo/TheSpoonyExperiment Spoony]], [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]], WebVideo/JonTron, WebVideo/UrinatingTree, or any other CausticCritic [[ReviewsAreTheGospel reviewed it]]. Nor is it horrible just because it has a flood of negative reviews on Amazon.com and Metacritic. [[note]]''VideoGame/DiabloIII'' is a prime example of a perfectly functional game with a ridiculous number of negative Amazon.com reviews -- at least 90% of which are nothing more than complaints about the game's DRM system.[[/note]] There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable, professional reviews, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review(s).)
