Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** She, like virtually everyone else, assumes that Naz was guilty and that it would be virtually impossible to get him free with a trial. By negotiating a "sweetheart" plea deal, she gets media coverage and credit for being a good lawyer with very little effort. Going go trial is a losing proposition. It would suck up her valuable time that she could be using on other cases that she can win, turn a big profit, and also get media attention.
to:
** She, like virtually everyone else, assumes that Naz was guilty and that it would be virtually impossible to get him free with a trial. By negotiating a "sweetheart" plea deal, she gets media coverage and credit for being a good lawyer with very little effort. Going go trial is a losing proposition. It would suck up her valuable time that she could be using on other cases that she can win, turn a big profit, and also get media attention.attention.
** Then why take the case at all?
** Then why take the case at all?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
* If Crowe was just representing Nasir for the sake of publicity, why was she so quick to try to strike a plea deal? Seems like a very anti-climactic and unremarkable thing to do that wouldn't gain much publicity... Compared to actually trying to defend an innocent man.
to:
* If Crowe was just representing Nasir for the sake of publicity, why was she so quick to try to strike a plea deal? Seems like a very anti-climactic and unremarkable thing to do that wouldn't gain much publicity... Compared to actually trying to defend an innocent
** She, like virtually everyone else, assumes that Naz was guilty and that it would be virtually impossible to get him free with a trial. By negotiating a "sweetheart" plea deal, she gets media coverage and credit for being a good lawyer with very little effort. Going go trial is a losing proposition. It would suck up her valuable time that she could be using on other cases that she can win, turn a big profit, and also get media attention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* If wearing a white shirt to court is so important, why didn't Stone tell Nasir to wear one beforehand?
to:
* If wearing a white shirt to court is so important, why didn't Stone tell Nasir to wear one beforehand?beforehand?
* If Crowe was just representing Nasir for the sake of publicity, why was she so quick to try to strike a plea deal? Seems like a very anti-climactic and unremarkable thing to do that wouldn't gain much publicity... Compared to actually trying to defend an innocent man.
* If Crowe was just representing Nasir for the sake of publicity, why was she so quick to try to strike a plea deal? Seems like a very anti-climactic and unremarkable thing to do that wouldn't gain much publicity... Compared to actually trying to defend an innocent man.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* If wearing a white shirt to court is so important, why didn't Stone tell Nasir to wear one beforehand?