Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / HarryPotterAndTheDeathlyHallowsUnsortedExamples

Go To

OR

Added: 270

Changed: 7

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Moreover, how has Grindelwald managed to stay so informed? Is some guard bringing him newspapers or something? I mean, he knows who Voldemort is, what he's capable of, and that he's the sort of dude to go after the Elder Wand – he also doesn't tell him about the Wand to protect Dumbledore's tomb, and to do that, he's got to know Dumbledore is dead. How? For a guy who's been in jail for more than fifty years, he knows more than Harry!

to:

* Moreover, how has Grindelwald managed to stay so informed? Is some guard bringing him newspapers or something? I mean, he knows who Voldemort is, what he's capable of, and that he's the sort of dude to go after the Elder Wand he also doesn't tell him about the Wand to protect Dumbledore's tomb, and to do that, he's got to know Dumbledore is dead. How? For a guy who's been in jail for more than fifty years, he knows more than Harry!


Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Wandless in Diagon Alley]]
* When the trio goes to Diagon Alley to break into Gringotts, they see several "wandless" as Travers calls them, begging in the streets. If they can't prove their magical heritage, shouldn't they have been sent to Azkaban?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** At the time they made that call they didn't know that they'd have a chance to destroy all 3 remaining Horcruxes w/in 24 hours. Hermione points out that it could take years. "We promise to give you the sword ''someday'' in the distant future" is a tough sell.

to:

** At the time they made that call they didn't know that they'd have a chance to destroy all 3 remaining Horcruxes w/in 24 hours. Hermione points out that it could take years. "We'll give you the sword the day after tomorrow" is an agreement that maybe they can make, "We promise to give you the sword ''someday'' in the distant future" is a tough sell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** At the time they made that call they didn't know that they'd have a chance to destroy all 3 remaining Horcruxes w/in 24 hours. Hermione points out that it could take years. "We promise to give you the sword ''someday'' in the distant future" is a tough sell.

Added: 105

Changed: 61

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Voldemort had very specific objects in mind for the Horcruxes, items of significant personal value (The diary and ring) or artifacts of Magical History (The diadem, locket, and cup). Anything else, even something potentially indestructible, would be unworthy to host Voldemort's soul in his mind.

to:

** Voldemort had very specific objects in mind for the Horcruxes, items of significant personal value (The diary and ring) or artifacts of Magical History (The diadem, locket, and cup). Anything else, even something potentially indestructible, would be unworthy to host Voldemort's soul in his mind. Particularly if it were made by one of the "lesser species."


Added DiffLines:

** Simple. They had the best wand maker in Britain imprisoned in the basement? Have him make a new wand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Would HAVE, not would of.


** One at a time. He was eleven years old during the incident with the dragon. Not only that, he was an eleven year old who came from an abusive household. Snape had already proven to be untrustworthy. He hadn't even met Dumbledore yet and he had only met [=McGonagall=] a handful of times. Hagrid was the one who rescued him from the Dursleys. He was trying to keep Hagrid out of trouble. Yes, the responsible thing would be to tell an adult, but Harry hasn't had many trustworthy ones in his life and, again, he was a child. He shouldn't be expected to act like adult. I admit, the stunt with the car was stupid. One of Harry's character flaws is recklessness, but that is still no excuse for Snape to be a bully. And why would Harry admit to hearing voices that no on else could hear? There was no logical reason at the time to believe that there was a giant sn\nake in the pipes. Harry didn't tell anyone because he was afraid he was losing his mind. Anyone else would of done the same. Again, there was no reason at the time to believe the diary was that dangerous. Harry thought Riddle was misinformed about Hargrid being the killer. Ginny was the one who stole it back. I've mentioned this before, but teenagers aren't known for their common sense. If Harry had a few lapse in judgement, like the broom Sirius sent, it isn't anything to condemn him for. Snape does bear a lot of the blame for what happened in the shack for his inability to think clearly. He's the teacher, after all. The same goes for the pensive incident and training Harry in mental defenses. There was no excuse for such heavy-handed tactics.

to:

** One at a time. He was eleven years old during the incident with the dragon. Not only that, he was an eleven year old who came from an abusive household. Snape had already proven to be untrustworthy. He hadn't even met Dumbledore yet and he had only met [=McGonagall=] a handful of times. Hagrid was the one who rescued him from the Dursleys. He was trying to keep Hagrid out of trouble. Yes, the responsible thing would be to tell an adult, but Harry hasn't had many trustworthy ones in his life and, again, he was a child. He shouldn't be expected to act like adult. I admit, the stunt with the car was stupid. One of Harry's character flaws is recklessness, but that is still no excuse for Snape to be a bully. And why would Harry admit to hearing voices that no on else could hear? There was no logical reason at the time to believe that there was a giant sn\nake in the pipes. Harry didn't tell anyone because he was afraid he was losing his mind. Anyone else would of have done the same. Again, there was no reason at the time to believe the diary was that dangerous. Harry thought Riddle was misinformed about Hargrid being the killer. Ginny was the one who stole it back. I've mentioned this before, but teenagers aren't known for their common sense. If Harry had a few lapse in judgement, like the broom Sirius sent, it isn't anything to condemn him for. Snape does bear a lot of the blame for what happened in the shack for his inability to think clearly. He's the teacher, after all. The same goes for the pensive incident and training Harry in mental defenses. There was no excuse for such heavy-handed tactics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It would be insane for the Ministry to keep the wands for those who have been convicted for major crimes. Lucius led the attack on a group of kids, a major crime no matter where you are. Bella tortured the Longbottoms into insanity. Yet if you an underaged wizard is expelled from Hogwarts, he gets his wand snapped? That sounds like dispopportinate retribution.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It did work. Amycus was "[writhing] through the air like a drowning man, thrashing and howling in pain" before finally being knocked unconscious after smashing into a bookcase.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It seems that spells that alter the nature of something stay even after the caster dies. We see that the stone Resurrection Stone, the Sorting Hat, and even Dumbledore's deluminator all worked after the death of the people who enchanted them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Technically, Harry could die. Voldy using Harry's blood, which contained Lily's protection merely kept Harry tied to life as long as Voldy lived. Harry was basically sent to the AfterlifeAntechamber where he could either return to the living or continue on to death.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Voldy felt the number 7 held special magical significance and wanted to split his soul into seven pieces. Prior to the murder of the Potters, he had created five horcruxes and planned to use Harry's death to create his final sixth horcrux so his soul was in seven pieces. So after Pettigrew found him and helped him to become a more solid entity, he killed Bertha Jonkins and created Nagini as his sixth horcrux, thinking his soul was now in seven pieces. He was not going to create any more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It didn't work anyways; the Order had cleared out by the time they went to pick up Harry and Snape was able to get in since the Pensieve scene where he takes the letter is after the Battle of the Seven Potters.

Top