Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** Princess Jasmine from ''Aladdin'' is a playable character beginning in ''2.0''.
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
*** Both Belle and Beast were planned to have figures before the series was cancelled, who were next-in-line after the 3 Alice figurines and to make matters worse: it was the live action remake versions of the two, meaning it would have been the Creator/EmmaWaston version of Belle (making it the closest to us getting Hermione Granger in a Disney game).
to:
*** Both Belle and Beast were planned to have figures before the series was cancelled, who were next-in-line after the 3 Alice figurines and to make matters worse: it was the live action remake versions of the two, meaning it would have been the Creator/EmmaWaston Creator/EmmaWatson version of Belle (making it the closest to us getting Hermione Granger in a Disney game).
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* Why aren't there any Franchise/KingdomHearts things in Disney Infinity? I'm not saying that there should be figurines of Sora, Riku or Master Xehanort since Square Enix owns those characters (though if they make a Xion figure a pre-order bonus for Kingdom Hearts III I'd be the first in line). But you'd think it would be relatively easy to add a Keyblade, the Skateboard from Kingdom Hearts II, a Gummi Ship, or even Donald's Kingdom Hearts costume as power tokens.
to:
* Why aren't there any Franchise/KingdomHearts things in Disney Infinity? I'm not saying that there should be figurines of Sora, Riku or Master Xehanort since Square Enix owns those characters (though if they make a Xion figure a pre-order bonus for Kingdom Hearts III I'd be the first in line). But you'd think it would be relatively easy to add a Keyblade, the Skateboard from Kingdom Hearts II, a Gummi Ship, or even Donald's Kingdom Hearts costume as power tokens.discs.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
*** Reason why Hiro and Baymax are classified as Disney Originals rather than Marvel is because had they been a part of the Marvel lineup, the Original line-up would have been overwhelmed by the Marvel cast of characters, plus Hiro and Baymax have completely different designs than their Marvel counterparts.
to:
*** Reason why Hiro and Baymax are classified as Disney Originals rather than Marvel is because had they been a part of the Marvel lineup, the Original line-up would have been outright overwhelmed by the Marvel cast of characters, plus Hiro and Baymax have completely different designs and origins than their Marvel counterparts.
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
*** Another reason was because of the same scenario that made Hiro and Baymax as part of the Disney Originals line-up. Had Nick Fury been a part of the Avengers line-up, it would have made the Spider-Man line-up far smaller overall and thus less rewarding and would have wrecked the playset balance (on top of them not having a Black Widow range character who uses guns).
to:
*** Another reason was because of the same scenario that made Hiro and Baymax as part of the Disney Originals line-up. line-up (2.0 Marvel overshadowing the 2.0 Disney Originals line-up). Had Nick Fury been a part of the Avengers line-up, it would have made the Avengers line-up overshadow the Spider-Man line-up and would have made the latter far smaller overall and thus less rewarding and would have wrecked the playset balance (on top (each Marvel playset has to have at least one range character, Avengers had Black Widow, Guardians of them not the Galaxy had both Rocket Raccoon and Star-Lord (which is balanced by having a Black Widow range character who uses guns).Rocket be playable in all 3 playsets) and had Nick Fury been on the Avengers line up, Spider-Man would have had no ''range'' characters in their line-up at all).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
** She's a Porsche. Disney Interactive would've had to talk to and pay [[Creator/ElectronicArts EA]] to get permission to use their exclusive video game license for the make in the game.
* We have seen evidence that Zurg and Ferb are playable characters, but neither are anywhere to be seen. Zurg has shown up in countless trailers front and center. Ferb has made brief appearances and has been noted to show up sometime on Twitter (albiet, the tweet got deleted). There are tons of people saying everything that's on the disc is all we're getting and neither character is there. What gives?
* We have seen evidence that Zurg and Ferb are playable characters, but neither are anywhere to be seen. Zurg has shown up in countless trailers front and center. Ferb has made brief appearances and has been noted to show up sometime on Twitter (albiet, the tweet got deleted). There are tons of people saying everything that's on the disc is all we're getting and neither character is there. What gives?
to:
** She's a Porsche. Disney Interactive would've had to talk to and pay [[Creator/ElectronicArts EA]] to get permission to use their exclusive video game license for the make character in the game.
* We have seen evidence that Zurg and Ferb are playable characters, but neither are anywhere to be seen. Zurg has shown up in countless trailers front and center. Ferb has made brief appearances and has been noted to show up sometime on Twitter(albiet, (albeit, the tweet got deleted). There are tons of people saying everything that's on the disc is all we're getting and neither character is there. What gives?
* We have seen evidence that Zurg and Ferb are playable characters, but neither are anywhere to be seen. Zurg has shown up in countless trailers front and center. Ferb has made brief appearances and has been noted to show up sometime on Twitter
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* Why aren't many of the ''Franchise/DisneyPrincesses'' playable, given that they're Disney's most popular franchise? Belle's horse Phillipe is available in-game, but where is Belle (and for that matter,THE BEAST)?
to:
* Why aren't many of the ''Franchise/DisneyPrincesses'' playable, given that they're Disney's most popular franchise? Belle's horse Phillipe is available in-game, but where is Belle (and for that matter,THE matter, THE BEAST)?
*** Both Belle and Beast were planned to have figures before the series was cancelled, who were next-in-line after the 3 Alice figurines and to make matters worse: it was the live action remake versions of the two, meaning it would have been the Creator/EmmaWaston version of Belle (making it the closest to us getting Hermione Granger in a Disney game).
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
** You can actually get a Keyblade in the 3.0 version. This, along with the King Mickey figure, shows that Disney is starting to acknowledge the Kingdom Hearts series.
to:
** You can actually get a Keyblade in the 3.0 version. This, along with the King Mickey figure, costume power disc, shows that Disney is starting to acknowledge the Kingdom Hearts series.
*** Reason why Hiro and Baymax are classified as Disney Originals rather than Marvel is because had they been a part of the Marvel lineup, the Original line-up would have been overwhelmed by the Marvel cast of characters, plus Hiro and Baymax have completely different designs than their Marvel counterparts.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** It might have something to do with how he's Spider-Man's boss (as Spidey joined S.H.I.E.L.D.) in ''WesternAnimation/UltimateSpiderMan2012''.
to:
** It might have something to do with how he's Spider-Man's boss (as Spidey joined S.H.I.E.L.D.) in ''WesternAnimation/UltimateSpiderMan2012''.''WesternAnimation/UltimateSpiderMan2012''.
*** Another reason was because of the same scenario that made Hiro and Baymax as part of the Disney Originals line-up. Had Nick Fury been a part of the Avengers line-up, it would have made the Spider-Man line-up far smaller overall and thus less rewarding and would have wrecked the playset balance (on top of them not having a Black Widow range character who uses guns).
*** Another reason was because of the same scenario that made Hiro and Baymax as part of the Disney Originals line-up. Had Nick Fury been a part of the Avengers line-up, it would have made the Spider-Man line-up far smaller overall and thus less rewarding and would have wrecked the playset balance (on top of them not having a Black Widow range character who uses guns).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** It might have something to do with how he's Spider-Man's boss (as Spidey joined S.H.I.E.L.D.) in WesternAnimation/UltimateSpiderMan.
to:
** It might have something to do with how he's Spider-Man's boss (as Spidey joined S.H.I.E.L.D.) in WesternAnimation/UltimateSpiderMan.''WesternAnimation/UltimateSpiderMan2012''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** They somewhat remedied that with Anna and Elsa, but I assume the other Disney princesses weren't as offensive-capable. Disney/{{Mulan}} should've been a no-brainer though.
to:
** They somewhat remedied that with Anna and Elsa, but I assume the other Disney princesses weren't as offensive-capable. Disney/{{Mulan}} WesternAnimation/{{Mulan}} should've been a no-brainer though.
